Literature DB >> 20709651

Progress in metastatic colorectal cancer: growing role of cetuximab to optimize clinical outcome.

Jesús García-Foncillas1, Eduardo Díaz-Rubio.   

Abstract

The prognosis of metastatic colorectal cancer remains poor despite advances made in recent years, particularly with new treatments directed towards molecular targets. Cetuximab, a chimeric immunoglobulin (Ig)G1 monoclonal antibody that targets the ligand-binding domain of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), is active in metastatic colorectal cancer. As an IgG1 antibody, cetuximab may exert its antitumour efficacy through both EGFR antagonism and antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity. The benefits of cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer are well documented in clinical trials and are acknowledged in the approval and licensing of this agent. There is evidence of the role of cetuximab not only in irinotecan-refractory or heavily pretreated patients, but also of the efficacy and safety of the addition of this agent to FOLFIRI (irinotecan/5-fluorouracil/leucovorin) in first-line metastatic colorectal cancer, with an enhanced effect in 5-fluorouracil patients with Kirsten rat sarcoma (KRAS) wild-type tumours. In these patients, a recent meta-analysis of the pooled Cetuximab Combined with Irinotecan in First-Line Therapy for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (CRYSTAL) and Oxaliplatin and Cetuximab in First-Line Treatment of mCRC (OPUS) patient populations confirms that the addition of cetuximab to first-line chemotherapy achieves a statistically significant improvement in the best overall response, overall survival time, and progression-free survival (PSF) compared with chemotherapy alone. In nonresectable colorectal liver metastases, cetuximab plus FOLFOX-6 (oxaliplatin/5-fluorouracil/leucovorin) or cetuximab plus FOLFIRI increased significantly resectability of liver metastases, including R0 resections. Also, preliminary data indicate that cetuximab can be administered in a more convenient 2-week schedule in combination with standard chemotherapy. Cetuximab is generally well tolerated. Acne-form rash is the most frequent toxicity. Up to the present time, the results obtained with targeted therapy combinations are not as encouraging as initially expected. The identification of biomarkers associated with disease control, including KRAS and BRAF mutation status in patients treated with cetuximab, is changing the current management of metastatic colorectal cancer. Clinical and molecular predictive markers of response are under active evaluation in order to better select patients who could benefit from cetuximab treatment, with the aim of both optimising patient outcomes and avoiding unnecessary toxicities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20709651     DOI: 10.1007/s12094-010-0551-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol        ISSN: 1699-048X            Impact factor:   3.340


  112 in total

1.  Cetuximab-induced hypomagnesemia in patients with colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Marwan G Fakih; Gregory Wilding; Jeffrey Lombardo
Journal:  Clin Colorectal Cancer       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.481

2.  Fc-engineered EGF-R antibodies mediate improved antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) against KRAS-mutated tumor cells.

Authors:  Martin Schlaeth; Sven Berger; Stefanie Derer; Katja Klausz; Stefan Lohse; Michael Dechant; Greg A Lazar; Tanja Schneider-Merck; Matthias Peipp; Thomas Valerius
Journal:  Cancer Sci       Date:  2010-01-20       Impact factor: 6.716

Review 3.  The integration of targeted agents into systemic therapy of metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  D Arnold; R Siewczynski; H-J Schmoll
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 32.976

4.  KRAS genotyping of paraffin-embedded colorectal cancer tissue in routine diagnostics: comparison of methods and impact of histology.

Authors:  Wilko Weichert; Christiane Schewe; Annika Lehmann; Christine Sers; Carsten Denkert; Jan Budczies; Albrecht Stenzinger; Hans Joos; Olfert Landt; Volker Heiser; Christoph Röcken; Manfred Dietel
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2009-12-10       Impact factor: 5.568

5.  Colorectal cancer surveillance: 2005 update of an American Society of Clinical Oncology practice guideline.

Authors:  Christopher E Desch; Al B Benson; Mark R Somerfield; Patrick J Flynn; Carol Krause; Charles L Loprinzi; Bruce D Minsky; David G Pfister; Katherine S Virgo; Nicholas J Petrelli
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-10-31       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Prognostic value of vascular endothelial growth factor expression in colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  J C Lee; N H Chow; S T Wang; S M Huang
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 9.162

7.  Phase II trial of capecitabine and oxaliplatin (CAPOX) plus cetuximab in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who progressed after oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy.

Authors:  J Souglakos; A Kalykaki; L Vamvakas; N Androulakis; K Kalbakis; S Agelaki; N Vardakis; M Tzardi; A P Kotsakis; J Gioulbasanis; D Tsetis; G Sfakiotaki; D Chatzidaki; D Mavroudis; V Georgoulias
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2006-11-01       Impact factor: 32.976

8.  Early magnesium reduction in advanced colorectal cancer patients treated with cetuximab plus irinotecan as predictive factor of efficacy and outcome.

Authors:  Bruno Vincenzi; Daniele Santini; Sara Galluzzo; Antonio Russo; Fabio Fulfaro; Marianna Silletta; Fabrizio Battistoni; Laura Rocci; Bruno Beomonte Zobel; Vincenzo Adamo; Giordano Dicuonzo; Giuseppe Tonini
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2008-07-01       Impact factor: 12.531

9.  Wild-type KRAS is required for panitumumab efficacy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Rafael G Amado; Michael Wolf; Marc Peeters; Eric Van Cutsem; Salvatore Siena; Daniel J Freeman; Todd Juan; Robert Sikorski; Sid Suggs; Robert Radinsky; Scott D Patterson; David D Chang
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-03-03       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Evaluation of serum carcinoembryonic antigen monitoring in the follow-up of colorectal cancer patients with metastatic lymph nodes and a normal preoperative serum level.

Authors:  E Tobaruela; J M Enriquez; M Diez; J Camunas; J Muguerza; J Granell
Journal:  Int J Biol Markers       Date:  1997 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 3.248

View more
  26 in total

1.  Phase II trial of lapatinib and topotecan (LapTop) in patients with platinum-refractory/resistant ovarian and primary peritoneal carcinoma.

Authors:  S John Weroha; Ann L Oberg; Katie L Allen Ziegler; Shaker R Dakhilm; Kendrith M Rowland; Lynn C Hartmann; Dennis F Moore; Gary L Keeney; Prema P Peethambaram; Paul Haluska
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2011-04-22       Impact factor: 5.482

2.  Specific alterations of the microRNA transcriptome and global network structure in colorectal cancer after treatment with MAPK/ERK inhibitors.

Authors:  Marco Ragusa; Luisa Statello; Marco Maugeri; Alessandra Majorana; Davide Barbagallo; Loredana Salito; Mariangela Sammito; Manuela Santonocito; Rosario Angelica; Andrea Cavallaro; Marina Scalia; Rosario Caltabiano; Giuseppe Privitera; Antonio Biondi; Maria Di Vita; Alessandro Cappellani; Enrico Vasquez; Salvatore Lanzafame; Elisabetta Tendi; Salvatore Celeste; Cinzia Di Pietro; Francesco Basile; Michele Purrello
Journal:  J Mol Med (Berl)       Date:  2012-06-04       Impact factor: 4.599

3.  IgA Fc-folate conjugate activates and recruits neutrophils to directly target triple-negative breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Eric D Frontera; Rafa M Khansa; Dana L Schalk; Lauren E Leakan; Tracey J Guerin-Edbauer; Manohar Ratnam; David H Gorski; Cecilia L Speyer
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2018-08-28       Impact factor: 4.872

4.  Liver angulometry: a simple method to estimate liver volume and ratios.

Authors:  Reza Kianmanesh; Tullio Piardi; Esther Tamby; Alina Parvanescu; Onorina Bruno; Elisa Palladino; Olivier Bouché; Simon Msika; Daniele Sommacale
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2013-03-08       Impact factor: 3.647

5.  Liver resection with concomitant inferior vena cava resection: experiences without veno-venous bypass.

Authors:  Stefan Stättner; Vincent Yip; Robert P Jones; Carmen Lacasia; Stephen W Fenwick; Graeme J Poston; Hassan Malik
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 2.549

6.  Generation of BiKEs and TriKEs to Improve NK Cell-Mediated Targeting of Tumor Cells.

Authors:  Martin Felices; Todd R Lenvik; Zachary B Davis; Jeffrey S Miller; Daniel A Vallera
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2016

7.  Membrane-type 6 matrix metalloproteinase regulates the activation-induced downmodulation of CD16 in human primary NK cells.

Authors:  Giovanna Peruzzi; Laurette Femnou; Aleksandra Gil-Krzewska; Francisco Borrego; Jennifer Weck; Konrad Krzewski; John E Coligan
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2013-07-12       Impact factor: 5.422

8.  High Expression of DARPP-32 in Colorectal Cancer Is Associated With Liver Metastases and Predicts Survival for Dukes A and B Patients: Results of a Pilot Study.

Authors:  Mario Kopljar; Leonardo Patrlj; Dragan Korolija-Marinic; Matija Horzic; Kristijan Cupurdija; Bore Bakota
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  2015-02

9.  Possibility of molecular targeting therapy for the treatment of cancer of unknown primary origin by analysis of intracellular signaling molecules.

Authors:  Shoichiro Ohta; Yukiko Cho; Masaharu Shibata; Kimihiro Nagai; Tatsuo Iijima; Hitoaki Saito; Hirotaka Asakura; Hiroshi Kojima
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 2.447

Review 10.  The biology of NK cells and their receptors affects clinical outcomes after hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT).

Authors:  Bree Foley; Martin Felices; Frank Cichocki; Sarah Cooley; Michael R Verneris; Jeffrey S Miller
Journal:  Immunol Rev       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 12.988

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.