Literature DB >> 20709207

Molecular markers for early detection.

Barbara K Dunn1, Paul D Wagner, Darrell Anderson, Peter Greenwald.   

Abstract

A common belief is that the earlier that cancer is detected, the better the chance exists for reduced mortality and morbidity. The advent of new and emerging molecular, genetic, and imaging technologies has broadened the possible strategies for early detection and prevention, but a beneficial impact on mortality needs to be supported by clinical evidence. Molecular markers are being identified that are enhancing our ability to predict and detect cancer before it develops and at the earliest signs of impending carcinogenic transformation. Of the innumerable molecular markers in development, a standalone early detection marker with acceptable sensitivity and specificity is available for bladder cancer, although for most cancer sites there are promising avenues of research that will likely produce results in the next decade. The perfect molecular marker would be one that is inherently related to the disease, specifically to the processes of malignant tumorigenesis or to the defense mechanisms of the individual. For example, mutations associated with increased cancer risk often produce gene products that interfere with tumor-suppressor pathways (eg, DNA repair or cell-cycle control) or support oncogenic pathways (eg, through genetic instability or silencing the apoptotic pathway). Finding molecular markers associated with these processes, and where in the process they produce their actions, can lead to interventions based on maintaining support for the normal process and interrupting the action of the products of the mutation. The search for molecular markers for cancer prevention and early detection presents a formidable challenge that requires a systematic and scientifically sound validation process. The search encompasses a broad range of scientific disciplines, including biochemistry, genetics, histology, immunology, informatic technologies, and epidemiology; strategies to identify and understand molecular markers are approached with multidisciplinary teams focused on understanding the mechanistic basis of cancer and the processes and pathways that underlie carcinogenesis. 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20709207     DOI: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2010.05.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Oncol        ISSN: 0093-7754            Impact factor:   4.929


  15 in total

1.  Progress against cancer (1971-2011): how far have we come?

Authors:  A K Tiwari; H K Roy
Journal:  J Intern Med       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 8.989

Review 2.  New paradigms in translational science research in cancer biomarkers.

Authors:  Paul D Wagner; Sudhir Srivastava
Journal:  Transl Res       Date:  2012-02-03       Impact factor: 7.012

3.  Clinicopathological pattern and Annexin A2 and Cdc42 status in patients presenting with differentiation and lymphnode metastasis of esophageal squamous cell carcinomas.

Authors:  Jun-Guo Feng; Qing Liu; Xu Qin; Yue-Hua Geng; Shu-Tao Zheng; Tao Liu; Ilyar Sheyhidin; Xiao-Mei Lu
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2011-05-21       Impact factor: 2.316

4.  Differential proteomic analysis of pathway biomarkers in human breast cancer by integrated bioinformatics.

Authors:  Liu Fu-Jun; Jin Shao-Hua; Shen Xiao-Fang
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2012-08-24       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 5.  Future directions in cancer prevention.

Authors:  Asad Umar; Barbara K Dunn; Peter Greenwald
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 6.  The hallmarks of premalignant conditions: a molecular basis for cancer prevention.

Authors:  Bríd M Ryan; Jessica M Faupel-Badger
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 4.929

Review 7.  Alternatives for the intensive follow-up after curative resection of colorectal cancer. Potential novel biomarkers for the recommendations.

Authors:  Enikő Orosz; István Ember; Katalin Gombos; László Tóth; Ádám Tarpay; Ákos Pap; Szabolcs Ottó
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2013-07-19       Impact factor: 3.201

8.  M2 isoform of pyruvate kinase (PKM2) is upregulated in Kazakh's ESCC and promotes proliferation and migration of ESCC cells.

Authors:  Qing Liu; Meng Liang; Tao Liu; Lucine Vuitton; Shutao Zheng; Xiangpeng Gao; Mang Lu; Xiuling Li; Ilyar Sheyhidin; Xiaomei Lu
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2015-09-24

9.  Identification of differentially expressed proteins in the locoregional recurrent esophageal squamous cell carcinoma by quantitative proteomics.

Authors:  Wei-Wei Yu; Xiao-Long Fu; Xu-Wei Cai; Meng-Hong Sun; Yan-Mei Guo
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2021-06

Review 10.  PCAT6 may be a new prognostic biomarker in various cancers: a meta-analysis and bioinformatics analysis.

Authors:  Song-Bo Shi; Qing-Hao Cheng; Shi-Yi Gong; Ting-Ting Lu; Shi-Fang Guo; Shao-Ming Song; Yu-Ping Yang; Qi Cui; Ke-Hu Yang; Yao-Wen Qian
Journal:  Cancer Cell Int       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 5.722

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.