Literature DB >> 20709198

Mechano-topographic modulation of stem cell nuclear shape on nanofibrous scaffolds.

Ashwin S Nathan1, Brendon M Baker, Nandan L Nerurkar, Robert L Mauck.   

Abstract

Stem cells transit along a variety of lineage-specific routes towards differentiated phenotypes. These fate decisions are dependent not just on the soluble chemical cues that are encountered or enforced in vivo and in vitro, but also on physical cues from the cellular microenvironment. These physical cues can consist of both nano- and micro-scale topographical features, as well as mechanical inputs provided passively (from the base properties of the materials to which they adhere) or actively (from extrinsic applied mechanical deformations). A suitable tool to investigate the coordination of these cues lies in nanofibrous scaffolds, which can both dictate cellular and cytoskeletal orientation and facilitate mechanical perturbation of seeded cells. Here, we demonstrate a coordinated influence of scaffold architecture (aligned vs. randomly organized fibers) and tensile deformation on nuclear shape and orientation. Sensitivity of nuclear morphology to scaffold architecture was more pronounced in stem cell populations than in terminally differentiated fibrochondrocytes. Tension applied to the scaffold elicited further alterations in nuclear morphology, greatest in stem cells, that were mediated by the filamentous actin cytoskeleton, but not the microtubule or intermediate filament network. Nuclear perturbations were time and direction dependent, suggesting that the modality and direction of loading influenced nuclear architecture. The present work may provide additional insight into the mechanisms by which the physical microenvironment influences cell fate decisions, and has specific application to the design of new materials for regenerative medicine applications with adult stem cells.
Copyright © 2010 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20709198      PMCID: PMC2967658          DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2010.08.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Biomater        ISSN: 1742-7061            Impact factor:   8.947


  53 in total

Review 1.  Mechanotransduction at a distance: mechanically coupling the extracellular matrix with the nucleus.

Authors:  Ning Wang; Jessica D Tytell; Donald E Ingber
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 94.444

2.  Nanotopography-induced changes in focal adhesions, cytoskeletal organization, and mechanical properties of human mesenchymal stem cells.

Authors:  Evelyn K F Yim; Eric M Darling; Karina Kulangara; Farshid Guilak; Kam W Leong
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2009-10-30       Impact factor: 12.479

3.  Long-term dynamic loading improves the mechanical properties of chondrogenic mesenchymal stem cell-laden hydrogel.

Authors:  Alice H Huang; Megan J Farrell; Minwook Kim; Robert L Mauck
Journal:  Eur Cell Mater       Date:  2010-02-26       Impact factor: 3.942

4.  Matrix elasticity, cytoskeletal forces and physics of the nucleus: how deeply do cells 'feel' outside and in?

Authors:  Amnon Buxboim; Irena L Ivanovska; Dennis E Discher
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 5.285

5.  Chondrocyte phenotype in engineered fibrous matrix is regulated by fiber size.

Authors:  Wan-Ju Li; Yi Jen Jiang; Rocky S Tuan
Journal:  Tissue Eng       Date:  2006-07

6.  Enhanced chondrogenesis of mesenchymal stem cells in collagen mimetic peptide-mediated microenvironment.

Authors:  H Janice Lee; Christopher Yu; Thanissara Chansakul; Nathaniel S Hwang; Shyni Varghese; Seungju M Yu; Jennifer H Elisseeff
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.845

Review 7.  Control of stem cell fate by physical interactions with the extracellular matrix.

Authors:  Farshid Guilak; Daniel M Cohen; Bradley T Estes; Jeffrey M Gimble; Wolfgang Liedtke; Christopher S Chen
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2009-07-02       Impact factor: 24.633

8.  Tissue engineering with meniscus cells derived from surgical debris.

Authors:  B M Baker; A S Nathan; G Russell Huffman; R L Mauck
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2008-10-10       Impact factor: 6.576

Review 9.  Growth factors, matrices, and forces combine and control stem cells.

Authors:  Dennis E Discher; David J Mooney; Peter W Zandstra
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-06-26       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Nanofibrous biologic laminates replicate the form and function of the annulus fibrosus.

Authors:  Nandan L Nerurkar; Brendon M Baker; Sounok Sen; Emily E Wible; Dawn M Elliott; Robert L Mauck
Journal:  Nat Mater       Date:  2009-10-25       Impact factor: 43.841

View more
  37 in total

1.  Macro- to microscale strain transfer in fibrous tissues is heterogeneous and tissue-specific.

Authors:  Woojin M Han; Su-Jin Heo; Tristan P Driscoll; Lachlan J Smith; Robert L Mauck; Dawn M Elliott
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2013-08-06       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Dynamic tensile loading improves the functional properties of mesenchymal stem cell-laden nanofiber-based fibrocartilage.

Authors:  Brendon M Baker; Roshan P Shah; Alice H Huang; Robert L Mauck
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2011-03-03       Impact factor: 3.845

3.  Fiber stretch and reorientation modulates mesenchymal stem cell morphology and fibrous gene expression on oriented nanofibrous microenvironments.

Authors:  Su-Jin Heo; Nandan L Nerurkar; Brendon M Baker; Jung-Woog Shin; Dawn M Elliott; Robert L Mauck
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2011-07-29       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 4.  Mechanical regulation of mesenchymal stem cell differentiation.

Authors:  Andrew J Steward; Daniel J Kelly
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2014-11-09       Impact factor: 2.610

5.  Sacrificial nanofibrous composites provide instruction without impediment and enable functional tissue formation.

Authors:  Brendon M Baker; Roshan P Shah; Amy M Silverstein; John L Esterhai; Jason A Burdick; Robert L Mauck
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-08-07       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Deconstructing the third dimension: how 3D culture microenvironments alter cellular cues.

Authors:  Brendon M Baker; Christopher S Chen
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2012-07-13       Impact factor: 5.285

7.  Defined topologically-complex protein matrices to manipulate cell shape via three-dimensional fiber-like patterns.

Authors:  Christopher Moraes; Byoung Choul Kim; Xiaoyue Zhu; Kristen L Mills; Angela R Dixon; M D Thouless; Shuichi Takayama
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2014-03-14       Impact factor: 6.799

8.  Cell morphology and focal adhesion location alters internal cell stress.

Authors:  C A Mullen; T J Vaughan; M C Voisin; M A Brennan; P Layrolle; L M McNamara
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2014-12-06       Impact factor: 4.118

9.  Organizational metrics of interchromatin speckle factor domains: integrative classifier for stem cell adhesion & lineage signaling.

Authors:  Sebastián L Vega; Anandika Dhaliwal; Varun Arvind; Parth J Patel; Nick R M Beijer; Jan de Boer; N Sanjeeva Murthy; Joachim Kohn; Prabhas V Moghe
Journal:  Integr Biol (Camb)       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 2.192

10.  The guidance of stem cell differentiation by substrate alignment and mechanical stimulation.

Authors:  Siddarth D Subramony; Booth R Dargis; Mario Castillo; Evren U Azeloglu; Michael S Tracey; Amanda Su; Helen H Lu
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 12.479

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.