Literature DB >> 23245926

The guidance of stem cell differentiation by substrate alignment and mechanical stimulation.

Siddarth D Subramony1, Booth R Dargis, Mario Castillo, Evren U Azeloglu, Michael S Tracey, Amanda Su, Helen H Lu.   

Abstract

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) represent a promising and clinically relevant cell source for tissue engineering applications. As such, guiding MSCs toward specific lineages and maintaining these phenotypes have been particularly challenging as the contributions of mechanical, chemical and structural cues to the complex differentiation process are largely unknown. To fully harness the potential of MSCs for regenerative medicine, a systematic investigation into the individual and combined effects of these stimuli is needed. In addition, unlike chemical stimulation, for which temporal and concentration gradients are difficult to control, mechanical stimulation and scaffold-based cues may be relatively more biomimetic and can be applied with greater control to ensure fidelity in MSC differentiation. The objective of this study is to investigate the role of nanofiber matrix alignment and mechanical stimulation on MSC differentiation, focusing on elucidating the relative contribution of each parameter in guided regeneration of functional connective tissues. It is observed that nanofiber alignment directs MSC response to physiological loading and that fibroblastic differentiation requires a combination of physiologically-relevant cell-material interactions in conjunction with mechanical stimulation. Importantly, the results of this study reveal that systemic and readily controllable cues, such as scaffold alignment and optimized mechanical stimulation, are sufficient to drive MSC differentiation, without the need for additional chemical stimuli. Moreover, these findings yield a set of fundamental design rules that can be readily applied to connective tissue regeneration strategies.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23245926      PMCID: PMC3689925          DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.11.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomaterials        ISSN: 0142-9612            Impact factor:   12.479


  62 in total

1.  Get a grip: integrins in cell-biomaterial interactions.

Authors:  Andrés J García
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 12.479

2.  Effect of cyclic strain and plating matrix on cell proliferation and integrin expression by ligament fibroblasts.

Authors:  Jo A Hannafin; Erik A Attia; Ross Henshaw; Russell F Warren; Madhu M Bhargava
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.494

3.  Characterization of a novel polymeric scaffold for potential application in tendon/ligament tissue engineering.

Authors:  S Sahoo; H Ouyang; James C-H Goh; T E Tay; S L Toh
Journal:  Tissue Eng       Date:  2006-01

4.  Scleraxis positively regulates the expression of tenomodulin, a differentiation marker of tenocytes.

Authors:  Chisa Shukunami; Aki Takimoto; Miwa Oro; Yuji Hiraki
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2006-06-27       Impact factor: 3.582

5.  Characterization of collagens and proteoglycans at the insertion of the human Achilles tendon.

Authors:  A D Waggett; J R Ralphs; A P Kwan; D Woodnutt; M Benjamin
Journal:  Matrix Biol       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 11.583

6.  Anterior cruciate ligament regeneration using braided biodegradable scaffolds: in vitro optimization studies.

Authors:  Helen H Lu; James A Cooper; Sharron Manuel; Joseph W Freeman; Mohammed A Attawia; Frank K Ko; Cato T Laurencin
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2005-01-13       Impact factor: 12.479

7.  Canine ACL fibroblast integrin expression and cell alignment in response to cyclic tensile strain in three-dimensional collagen gels.

Authors:  D Ross Henshaw; Erik Attia; Madhu Bhargava; Jo A Hannafin
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.494

8.  Tenomodulin is necessary for tenocyte proliferation and tendon maturation.

Authors:  Denitsa Docheva; Ernst B Hunziker; Reinhard Fässler; Oliver Brandau
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.272

9.  Integrin specificity and enhanced cellular activities associated with surfaces presenting a recombinant fibronectin fragment compared to RGD supports.

Authors:  Timothy A Petrie; Jeffrey R Capadona; Catherine D Reyes; Andrés J García
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2006-07-18       Impact factor: 12.479

10.  Bioactive nanofibers for fibroblastic differentiation of mesenchymal precursor cells for ligament/tendon tissue engineering applications.

Authors:  Sambit Sahoo; Lay-Teng Ang; James Cho-Hong Goh; Siew-Lok Toh
Journal:  Differentiation       Date:  2009-12-05       Impact factor: 3.880

View more
  68 in total

Review 1.  Mechanical Actuation Systems for the Phenotype Commitment of Stem Cell-Based Tendon and Ligament Tissue Substitutes.

Authors:  Marco Govoni; Claudio Muscari; Joseph Lovecchio; Carlo Guarnieri; Emanuele Giordano
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 5.739

Review 2.  The (dys)functional extracellular matrix.

Authors:  Benjamin R Freedman; Nathan D Bade; Corinne N Riggin; Sijia Zhang; Philip G Haines; Katy L Ong; Paul A Janmey
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2015-04-27

3.  TGFβ2-induced tenogenesis impacts cadherin and connexin cell-cell junction proteins in mesenchymal stem cells.

Authors:  Sophia K Theodossiou; John Tokle; Nathan R Schiele
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2018-12-08       Impact factor: 3.575

4.  The connection between cellular mechanoregulation and tissue patterns during bone healing.

Authors:  Felix Repp; Andreas Vetter; Georg N Duda; Richard Weinkamer
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2015-04-11       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 5.  Structural properties of scaffolds: Crucial parameters towards stem cells differentiation.

Authors:  Laleh Ghasemi-Mobarakeh; Molamma P Prabhakaran; Lingling Tian; Elham Shamirzaei-Jeshvaghani; Leila Dehghani; Seeram Ramakrishna
Journal:  World J Stem Cells       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 5.326

Review 6.  Tendon stem progenitor cells: Understanding the biology to inform therapeutic strategies for tendon repair.

Authors:  Bhavita Walia; Alice H Huang
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2018-10-18       Impact factor: 3.494

7.  Enhancement of tenogenic differentiation of human adipose stem cells by tendon-derived extracellular matrix.

Authors:  Guang Yang; Benjamin B Rothrauff; Hang Lin; Riccardo Gottardi; Peter G Alexander; Rocky S Tuan
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2013-09-14       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 8.  In Vitro Innovation of Tendon Tissue Engineering Strategies.

Authors:  Maria Rita Citeroni; Maria Camilla Ciardulli; Valentina Russo; Giovanna Della Porta; Annunziata Mauro; Mohammad El Khatib; Miriam Di Mattia; Devis Galesso; Carlo Barbera; Nicholas R Forsyth; Nicola Maffulli; Barbara Barboni
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-09-14       Impact factor: 5.923

9.  Layer-by-layer nanofiber-enabled engineering of biomimetic periosteum for bone repair and reconstruction.

Authors:  Tao Wang; Yuankun Zhai; Marc Nuzzo; Xiaochuan Yang; Yunpeng Yang; Xinping Zhang
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 12.479

10.  Schwann cells promote endothelial cell migration.

Authors:  Tiago Ramos; Maqsood Ahmed; Paul Wieringa; Lorenzo Moroni
Journal:  Cell Adh Migr       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 3.405

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.