Literature DB >> 20709195

Commentary: Deciphering the link between architecture and biological response of a bone graft substitute.

M Bohner1, Y Loosli, G Baroud, D Lacroix.   

Abstract

Hundreds of studies have been devoted to the search for the ideal architecture for bone scaffold. Despite these efforts, results are often contradictory, and rules derived from these studies are accordingly vague. In fact, there is enough evidence to postulate that ideal scaffold architecture does not exist. The aim of this document is to explain this statement and review new approaches to decipher the existing but complex link between scaffold architecture and in vivo response.
Copyright © 2010 Acta Materialia Inc. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20709195     DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2010.08.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Biomater        ISSN: 1742-7061            Impact factor:   8.947


  21 in total

1.  Simulation of cell seeding within a three-dimensional porous scaffold: a fluid-particle analysis.

Authors:  Andy L Olivares; Damien Lacroix
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods       Date:  2012-04-02       Impact factor: 3.056

Review 2.  Reconsidering Osteoconduction in the Era of Additive Manufacturing.

Authors:  Franz E Weber
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 6.389

3.  3D printed β-TCP bone tissue engineering scaffolds: Effects of chemistry on in vivo biological properties in a rabbit tibia model.

Authors:  Samit Kumar Nandi; Gary Fielding; Dishary Banerjee; Amit Bandyopadhyay; Susmita Bose
Journal:  J Mater Res       Date:  2018-07-27       Impact factor: 3.089

Review 4.  Scaffolds and coatings for bone regeneration.

Authors:  Helena Filipa Pereira; Ibrahim Fatih Cengiz; Filipe Samuel Silva; Rui Luís Reis; Joaquim Miguel Oliveira
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2020-03-02       Impact factor: 3.896

5.  Remodeling of tissue-engineered bone structures in vivo.

Authors:  Sandra Hofmann; Monika Hilbe; Robert J Fajardo; Henri Hagenmüller; Katja Nuss; Margarete Arras; Ralph Müller; Brigitte von Rechenberg; David L Kaplan; Hans P Merkle; Lorenz Meinel
Journal:  Eur J Pharm Biopharm       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 5.571

6.  An Injectable Hydrogel as Bone Graft Material with Added Antimicrobial Properties.

Authors:  Giacomo Tommasi; Stefano Perni; Polina Prokopovich
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 3.845

Review 7.  Calcium Orthophosphate-Based Bioceramics.

Authors:  Sergey V Dorozhkin
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2013-09-06       Impact factor: 3.623

Review 8.  An Insight of Nanomaterials in Tissue Engineering from Fabrication to Applications.

Authors:  Ritika Sharma; Sanjeev Kumar; Akanksha Gupta; Neelu Dheer; Pallavi Jain; Prashant Singh; Vinod Kumar
Journal:  Tissue Eng Regen Med       Date:  2022-06-04       Impact factor: 4.451

9.  Wicking Property of Graft Material Enhanced Bone Regeneration in the Ovariectomized Rat Model.

Authors:  Seunghyun Kim; Taeho Ahn; Myung-Ho Han; Chunsik Bae; Daniel S Oh
Journal:  Tissue Eng Regen Med       Date:  2018-07-13       Impact factor: 4.169

10.  Micropore-induced capillarity enhances bone distribution in vivo in biphasic calcium phosphate scaffolds.

Authors:  Laurence E Rustom; Thomas Boudou; Siyu Lou; Isabelle Pignot-Paintrand; Brett W Nemke; Yan Lu; Mark D Markel; Catherine Picart; Amy J Wagoner Johnson
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 8.947

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.