Literature DB >> 20708982

Homologous recombination protects mammalian cells from replication-associated DNA double-strand breaks arising in response to methyl methanesulfonate.

Teodora Nikolova1, Michael Ensminger, Markus Löbrich, Bernd Kaina.   

Abstract

DNA-methylating agents of the S(N)2 type target DNA mostly at ring nitrogens, producing predominantly N-methylated purines. These adducts are repaired by base excision repair (BER). Since defects in BER cause accumulation of DNA single-strand breaks (SSBs) and sensitize cells to the agents, it has been suggested that some of the lesions on their own or BER intermediates (e.g. apurinic sites) are cytotoxic, blocking DNA replication and inducing replication-mediated DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). Here, we addressed the question of whether homologous recombination (HR) or non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) or both are involved in the repair of DSBs formed following treatment of cells with methyl methanesulfonate (MMS). We show that HR defective cells (BRCA2, Rad51D and XRCC3 mutants) are dramatically more sensitive to MMS-induced DNA damage as measured by colony formation, apoptosis and chromosomal aberrations, while NHEJ defective cells (Ku80 and DNA-PK(CS) mutants) are only mildly sensitive to the killing, apoptosis-inducing and clastogenic effects of MMS. On the other hand, the HR mutants were almost completely refractory to the formation of sister chromatid exchanges (SCEs) following MMS treatment. Since DSBs are expected to be formed specifically in the S-phase, we assessed the formation and kinetics of repair of DSBs by γH2AX quantification in a cell cycle specific manner. In the cytotoxic dose range of MMS a significant amount of γH2AX foci was induced in S, but not G1- and G2-phase cells. A major fraction of γH2AX foci colocalized with 53BP1 and phosphorylated ATM, indicating they are representative of DSBs. DSB formation following MMS treatment was also demonstrated by the neutral comet assay. Repair kinetics revealed that HR mutants exhibit a significant delay in DSB repair, while NHEJ mutants completed S-phase specific DSB repair with a kinetic similar to the wildtype. Moreover, DNA-PKcs inhibition in HR mutants did not affect the repair kinetics after MMS treatment. Overall, the data indicate that agents producing N-alkylpurines in the DNA induce replication-dependent DSBs. Further, they show that HR is the major pathway of protection of cells against DSB formation, killing and genotoxicity following S(N)2-alkylating agents.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20708982     DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2010.07.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)        ISSN: 1568-7856


  30 in total

1.  DNA glycosylase activity and cell proliferation are key factors in modulating homologous recombination in vivo.

Authors:  Orsolya Kiraly; Guanyu Gong; Megan D Roytman; Yoshiyuki Yamada; Leona D Samson; Bevin P Engelward
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2014-08-25       Impact factor: 4.944

2.  Alkylating Agent-Induced NRF2 Blocks Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress-Mediated Apoptosis via Control of Glutathione Pools and Protein Thiol Homeostasis.

Authors:  Alfeu Zanotto-Filho; V Pragathi Masamsetti; Eva Loranc; Sonal S Tonapi; Aparna Gorthi; Xavier Bernard; Rosângela Mayer Gonçalves; José C F Moreira; Yidong Chen; Alexander J R Bishop
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 6.261

3.  Sister chromatid exchanges occur in G2-irradiated cells.

Authors:  Sandro Conrad; Julia Künzel; Markus Löbrich
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2011-01-15       Impact factor: 4.534

4.  DNA damage in the presence of chemical genotoxic agents induce acetylation of H3K56 and H4K16 but not H3K9 in mammalian cells.

Authors:  Rahul Kumar Vempati; Devyani Haldar
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2011-05-15       Impact factor: 2.316

5.  DNA unwinding by ASCC3 helicase is coupled to ALKBH3-dependent DNA alkylation repair and cancer cell proliferation.

Authors:  Sebastian Dango; Nima Mosammaparast; Mathew E Sowa; Li-Jun Xiong; Feizhen Wu; Keyjung Park; Mark Rubin; Steve Gygi; J Wade Harper; Yang Shi
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2011-11-04       Impact factor: 17.970

6.  Histone H3 lysine 56 acetylation and the response to DNA replication fork damage.

Authors:  Hugo Wurtele; Gitte Schalck Kaiser; Julien Bacal; Edlie St-Hilaire; Eun-Hye Lee; Sarah Tsao; Jonas Dorn; Paul Maddox; Michael Lisby; Philippe Pasero; Alain Verreault
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2011-10-24       Impact factor: 4.272

7.  Modulation of BRCA1 mediated DNA damage repair by deregulated ER-α signaling in breast cancers.

Authors:  Arathi Rajan; Geetu R Varghese; Induprabha Yadev; Jaimie Anandan; Neetha R Latha; Dipyaman Patra; Neethu Krishnan; Krithiga Kuppusamy; Arathy V Warrier; Satej Bhushan; Revathy Nadhan; Ram Mohan Ram Kumar; Priya Srinivas
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2022-01-15       Impact factor: 6.166

8.  Nek1 Regulates Rad54 to Orchestrate Homologous Recombination and Replication Fork Stability.

Authors:  Julian Spies; Anja Waizenegger; Olivia Barton; Michael Sürder; William D Wright; Wolf-Dietrich Heyer; Markus Löbrich
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 17.970

9.  Activation of DNA damage repair pathways in response to nitrogen mustard-induced DNA damage and toxicity in skin keratinocytes.

Authors:  Swetha Inturi; Neera Tewari-Singh; Chapla Agarwal; Carl W White; Rajesh Agarwal
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2014-04-13       Impact factor: 2.433

10.  Synergistic Action between PfHsp90 Inhibitor and PfRad51 Inhibitor Induces Elevated DNA Damage Sensitivity in the Malaria Parasite.

Authors:  Wahida Tabassum; Priyanka Singh; Niranjan Suthram; Sunanda Bhattacharyya; Mrinal Kanti Bhattacharyya
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2021-08-17       Impact factor: 5.191

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.