Literature DB >> 20708921

Obstetric anesthesia units in Israel: a national questionnaire-based survey.

C F Weiniger1, S Ivri, A Ioscovich, L Grimberg, S Evron, Y Ginosar.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This survey was performed to assess the organization and practice of obstetric anesthesia units in Israel.
METHODS: A written questionnaire was mailed at the end of December 2005 to all Israeli anesthesia departments providing labor and delivery services in 2005 (n=25).
RESULTS: A response rate of 100% accounted for 125,340 deliveries. All labor and delivery suites had on-site anesthesia department services. Data are presented as mean (range) or frequency. Eleven hospitals performed 2500-4999 deliveries/year, 6 hospitals 5000-7499 deliveries/year, and 4 hospitals 7500-9999 deliveries/year. The overall cesarean delivery rate was 20% (0-27). Anesthesia for cesarean delivery (elective and emergency combined) was provided by: general anesthesia 15% (0.5-50), epidural 14.5% (0-99.5), spinal 68% (0-98), or combined spinal-epidural technique 0% (0-30). There was an operating room within or immediately adjacent to the labor ward in 16/25 units, including 10/11 units with >5000 deliveries/year. Labor analgesia was provided by epidural techniques in 50% (4-93) and nitrous oxide in 0.5% (0-90) of deliveries. A total of 11 units had 24h dedicated anesthesiologist coverage, including all units >7500 deliveries but only 3/8 (38%) with 5000-7500 deliveries. Two of the 4 units with >7500 deliveries had no faculty member with formal training in obstetric anesthesia. Written protocols were available for labor analgesia (17/25), post-partum hemorrhage (12/25), aspiration prophylaxis (15/25) and maternal resuscitation (8/25).
CONCLUSION: In this national appraisal of Israeli obstetric anesthesia services, a notable lack of written protocols, wide variations in staffing, and few specifically trained obstetric anesthesia personnel were observed.
Copyright © 2010. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20708921     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2010.04.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Obstet Anesth        ISSN: 0959-289X            Impact factor:   2.603


  6 in total

1.  Anaesthesia Techniques for Caesarean Operations: Retrospective Analysis of Last Decade.

Authors:  Mehmet Aksoy; Ayşe Nur Aksoy; Ayşenur Dostbil; Mine Gürsaç Çelik; Ali Ahıskalıoğlu
Journal:  Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim       Date:  2014-03-11

2.  Integration of advanced practice providers into the Israeli healthcare system.

Authors:  Eliana Marcus Aaron; Caryn Scheinberg Andrews
Journal:  Isr J Health Policy Res       Date:  2016-02-22

3.  The trends of obstetric anesthesia practice: In a tertiary care center in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Mohammed Alshabibi; Azza M Madkhali; Amer A Alkinani; Ali A Alyami; Abdulaleem Alatassi
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2021-09-02

4.  Anesthetic management in cesarean delivery of women with placenta previa: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Dazhi Fan; Jiaming Rao; Dongxin Lin; Huishan Zhang; Zixing Zhou; Gengdong Chen; Pengsheng Li; Wen Wang; Ting Chen; Fengying Chen; Yuping Ye; Xiaoling Guo; Zhengping Liu
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2021-10-19       Impact factor: 2.217

5.  Comparison of the obstetric anesthesia activity index with total delivery numbers as a single denominator of workload demand in Israeli maternity units.

Authors:  Yehuda Ginosar; Alex Ioscovich; Charles Weissman; Ronit Calderon-Margalit; Carolyn F Weiniger
Journal:  Isr J Health Policy Res       Date:  2012-12-14

Review 6.  Enhanced recovery after cesarean delivery.

Authors:  Unyime Ituk; Ashraf S Habib
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2018-04-27
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.