OBJECTIVE: We sought to assess pregnancy outcome along a continuum of cervical lengths (CLs) ≥25 mm. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted planned secondary analysis of a randomized cerclage trial of women with prior spontaneous preterm birth 17(0)-34(6/7) weeks. Outcomes of women who maintained CLs ≥25 mm were analyzed. Women with CLs <25 mm randomized to no cerclage comprised an internal comparison group. RESULTS:Of 1014 screened, 153 had CL <25 mm, and 672 had CL ≥25 mm. Birth <35 weeks occurred in 16% of the ≥25 mm cohort. The relationship between CLs ≥25 mm and birth gestational age was null (P = .15). In the <25 mm group, progressively shorter CLs predicted birth <35 weeks (P < .001); this relationship was null in the ≥25 mm group (P = .17). CONCLUSION: The continuum of CLs ≥25 mm measured between 16(0/7)-22(6/7) weeks does not predict gestational length in women with prior spontaneous preterm birth.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: We sought to assess pregnancy outcome along a continuum of cervical lengths (CLs) ≥25 mm. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted planned secondary analysis of a randomized cerclage trial of women with prior spontaneous preterm birth 17(0)-34(6/7) weeks. Outcomes of women who maintained CLs ≥25 mm were analyzed. Women with CLs <25 mm randomized to no cerclage comprised an internal comparison group. RESULTS: Of 1014 screened, 153 had CL <25 mm, and 672 had CL ≥25 mm. Birth <35 weeks occurred in 16% of the ≥25 mm cohort. The relationship between CLs ≥25 mm and birth gestational age was null (P = .15). In the <25 mm group, progressively shorter CLs predicted birth <35 weeks (P < .001); this relationship was null in the ≥25 mm group (P = .17). CONCLUSION: The continuum of CLs ≥25 mm measured between 16(0/7)-22(6/7) weeks does not predict gestational length in women with prior spontaneous preterm birth.
Authors: J Owen; N Yost; V Berghella; E Thom; M Swain; G A Dildy; M Miodovnik; O Langer; B Sibai; D McNellis Journal: JAMA Date: 2001-09-19 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: John Owen; Gary Hankins; Jay D Iams; Vincenzo Berghella; Jeanne S Sheffield; Annette Perez-Delboy; Robert S Egerman; Deborah A Wing; Mark Tomlinson; Richard Silver; Susan M Ramin; Edwin R Guzman; Michael Gordon; Helen Y How; Eric J Knudtson; Jeff M Szychowski; Suzanne Cliver; John C Hauth Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2009-10 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: J D Iams; R L Goldenberg; P J Meis; B M Mercer; A Moawad; A Das; E Thom; D McNellis; R L Copper; F Johnson; J M Roberts Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1996-02-29 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Paul J Meis; Mark Klebanoff; Elizabeth Thom; Mitchell P Dombrowski; Baha Sibai; Atef H Moawad; Catherine Y Spong; John C Hauth; Menachem Miodovnik; Michael W Varner; Kenneth J Leveno; Steve N Caritis; Jay D Iams; Ronald J Wapner; Deborah Conway; Mary J O'Sullivan; Marshall Carpenter; Brian Mercer; Susan M Ramin; John M Thorp; Alan M Peaceman; Steven Gabbe Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2003-06-12 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: J M Szychowski; J Owen; G Hankins; J D Iams; J S Sheffield; A Perez-Delboy; V Berghella; D A Wing; E R Guzman Journal: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol Date: 2016-05-29 Impact factor: 7.299
Authors: Rafał Rzepka; Barbara Dołęgowska; Aleksandra Rajewska; Daria Sałata; Marta Budkowska; Sebastian Kwiatkowski; Andrzej Torbé Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2016-07-31 Impact factor: 3.411
Authors: Panagiotis Tsikouras; George Anastasopoulos; Vasileios Maroulis; Anastasia Bothou; Anna Chalkidou; Dorelia Deuteraiou; Xanthoula Anthoulaki; Georgios Tsatsaris; Arzou Halil Bourazan; George Iatrakis; Stefanos Zervoudis; Georgios Galazios; Lola-Katerina Inagamova; Roland Csorba; Alexander-Tobias Teichmann Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2018-04-18 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Jose G Cecatti; Renato T Souza; Karolina Sulek; Maria L Costa; Louise C Kenny; Lesley M McCowan; Rodolfo C Pacagnella; Silas G Villas-Boas; Jussara Mayrink; Renato Passini; Kleber G Franchini; Philip N Baker Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Date: 2016-08-08 Impact factor: 3.007