Literature DB >> 20707311

Structural insight into methyl-coenzyme M reductase chemistry using coenzyme B analogues .

Peder E Cedervall1, Mishtu Dey, Arwen R Pearson, Stephen W Ragsdale, Carrie M Wilmot.   

Abstract

Methyl-coenzyme M reductase (MCR) catalyzes the final and rate-limiting step in methane biogenesis: the reduction of methyl-coenzyme M (methyl-SCoM) by coenzyme B (CoBSH) to methane and a heterodisulfide (CoBS-SCoM). Crystallographic studies show that the active site is deeply buried within the enzyme and contains a highly reduced nickel-tetrapyrrole, coenzyme F(430). Methyl-SCoM must enter the active site prior to CoBSH, as species derived from methyl-SCoM are always observed bound to the F(430) nickel in the deepest part of the 30 A long substrate channel that leads from the protein surface to the active site. The seven-carbon mercaptoalkanoyl chain of CoBSH binds within a 16 A predominantly hydrophobic part of the channel close to F(430), with the CoBSH thiolate lying closest to the nickel at a distance of 8.8 A. It has previously been suggested that binding of CoBSH initiates catalysis by inducing a conformational change that moves methyl-SCoM closer to the nickel promoting cleavage of the C-S bond of methyl-SCoM. In order to better understand the structural role of CoBSH early in the MCR mechanism, we have determined crystal structures of MCR in complex with four different CoBSH analogues: pentanoyl, hexanoyl, octanoyl, and nonanoyl derivatives of CoBSH (CoB(5)SH, CoB(6)SH, CoB(8)SH, and CoB(9)SH, respectively). The data presented here reveal that the shorter CoB(5)SH mercaptoalkanoyl chain overlays with that of CoBSH but terminates two units short of the CoBSH thiolate position. In contrast, the mercaptoalkanoyl chain of CoB(6)SH adopts a different conformation, such that its thiolate is coincident with the position of the CoBSH thiolate. This is consistent with the observation that CoB(6)SH is a slow substrate. A labile water in the substrate channel was found to be a sensitive indicator for the presence of CoBSH and HSCoM. The longer CoB(8)SH and CoB(9)SH analogues can be accommodated in the active site through exclusion of this water. These analogues react with Ni(III)-methyl, a proposed MCR catalytic intermediate of methanogenesis. The CoB(8)SH thiolate is 2.6 A closer to the nickel than that of CoBSH, but the additional carbon of CoB(9)SH only decreases the nickel thiolate distance a further 0.3 A. Although the analogues do not induce any structural changes in the substrate channel, the thiolates appear to preferentially bind at two distinct positions in the channel, one being the previously observed CoBSH thiolate position and the other being at a hydrophobic annulus of residues that lines the channel proximal to the nickel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20707311      PMCID: PMC3098740          DOI: 10.1021/bi100458d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry        ISSN: 0006-2960            Impact factor:   3.162


  49 in total

1.  The nickel enzyme methyl-coenzyme M reductase from methanogenic archaea: In vitro induction of the nickel-based MCR-ox EPR signals from MCR-red2.

Authors:  Felix Mahlert; Carsten Bauer; Bernhard Jaun; Rudolf K Thauer; Evert C Duin
Journal:  J Biol Inorg Chem       Date:  2002-02-14       Impact factor: 3.358

2.  Coordination and geometry of the nickel atom in active methyl-coenzyme M reductase from Methanothermobacter marburgensis as detected by X-ray absorption spectroscopy.

Authors:  Evert C Duin; Nathaniel J Cosper; Felix Mahlert; Rudolf K Thauer; Robert A Scott
Journal:  J Biol Inorg Chem       Date:  2002-09-20       Impact factor: 3.358

3.  Comparison of three methyl-coenzyme M reductases from phylogenetically distant organisms: unusual amino acid modification, conservation and adaptation.

Authors:  W Grabarse; F Mahlert; S Shima; R K Thauer; U Ermler
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2000-10-20       Impact factor: 5.469

4.  Mechanistic studies of methane biogenesis by methyl-coenzyme M reductase: evidence that coenzyme B participates in cleaving the C-S bond of methyl-coenzyme M.

Authors:  Y C Horng; D F Becker; S W Ragsdale
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2001-10-30       Impact factor: 3.162

5.  X-ray absorption and resonance Raman studies of methyl-coenzyme M reductase indicating that ligand exchange and macrocycle reduction accompany reductive activation.

Authors:  Qun Tang; Paul E Carrington; Yih-Chern Horng; Michael J Maroney; Stephen W Ragsdale; David F Bocian
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2002-11-06       Impact factor: 15.419

6.  Cryoreduction of methyl-coenzyme M reductase: EPR characterization of forms, MCR(ox1) and MCR (red1).

Authors:  J Telser; R Davydov; Y C Horng; S W Ragsdale; B M Hoffman
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2001-06-27       Impact factor: 15.419

7.  On the mechanism of biological methane formation: structural evidence for conformational changes in methyl-coenzyme M reductase upon substrate binding.

Authors:  W Grabarse; F Mahlert; E C Duin; M Goubeaud; S Shima; R K Thauer; V Lamzin; U Ermler
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2001-05-25       Impact factor: 5.469

8.  The nickel enzyme methyl-coenzyme M reductase from methanogenic archaea: in vitro interconversions among the EPR detectable MCR-red1 and MCR-red2 states.

Authors:  Felix Mahlert; Wolfgang Grabarse; Jörg Kahnt; Rudolf K Thauer; Evert C Duin
Journal:  J Biol Inorg Chem       Date:  2001-07-27       Impact factor: 3.358

9.  Methane formation by reaction of a methyl thioether with a photo-excited nickel thiolate--a process mimicking methanogenesis in archaea.

Authors:  L Signor; C Knuppe; R Hug; B Schweizer; A Pfaltz; B Jaun
Journal:  Chemistry       Date:  2000-10-02       Impact factor: 5.236

10.  A mechanism from quantum chemical studies for methane formation in methanogenesis.

Authors:  Vladimir Pelmenschikov; Margareta R A Blomberg; Per E M Siegbahn; Robert H Crabtree
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2002-04-17       Impact factor: 15.419

View more
  19 in total

Review 1.  Fundamentals of methanogenic pathways that are key to the biomethanation of complex biomass.

Authors:  James G Ferry
Journal:  Curr Opin Biotechnol       Date:  2011-05-17       Impact factor: 9.740

2.  The reaction mechanism of methyl-coenzyme M reductase: how an enzyme enforces strict binding order.

Authors:  Thanyaporn Wongnate; Stephen W Ragsdale
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Structural analysis of a Ni-methyl species in methyl-coenzyme M reductase from Methanothermobacter marburgensis.

Authors:  Peder E Cedervall; Mishtu Dey; Xianghui Li; Ritimukta Sarangi; Britt Hedman; Stephen W Ragsdale; Carrie M Wilmot
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2011-03-25       Impact factor: 15.419

4.  XFEL serial crystallography reveals the room temperature structure of methyl-coenzyme M reductase.

Authors:  Christopher J Ohmer; Medhanjali Dasgupta; Anjali Patwardhan; Isabel Bogacz; Corey Kaminsky; Margaret D Doyle; Percival Yang-Ting Chen; Stephen M Keable; Hiroki Makita; Philipp S Simon; Ramzi Massad; Thomas Fransson; Ruchira Chatterjee; Asmit Bhowmick; Daniel W Paley; Nigel W Moriarty; Aaron S Brewster; Leland B Gee; Roberto Alonso-Mori; Frank Moss; Franklin D Fuller; Alexander Batyuk; Nicholas K Sauter; Uwe Bergmann; Catherine L Drennan; Vittal K Yachandra; Junko Yano; Jan F Kern; Stephen W Ragsdale
Journal:  J Inorg Biochem       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 4.155

5.  Anaerobic fixed-target serial crystallography.

Authors:  Patrick Rabe; John H Beale; Agata Butryn; Pierre Aller; Anna Dirr; Pauline A Lang; Danny N Axford; Stephen B Carr; Thomas M Leissing; Michael A McDonough; Bradley Davy; Ali Ebrahim; Julien Orlans; Selina L S Storm; Allen M Orville; Christopher J Schofield; Robin L Owen
Journal:  IUCrJ       Date:  2020-08-21       Impact factor: 4.769

Review 6.  Correlated single-crystal electronic absorption spectroscopy and X-ray crystallography at NSLS beamline X26-C.

Authors:  Allen M Orville; Richard Buono; Matt Cowan; Annie Héroux; Grace Shea-McCarthy; Dieter K Schneider; John M Skinner; Michael J Skinner; Deborah Stoner-Ma; Robert M Sweet
Journal:  J Synchrotron Radiat       Date:  2011-03-19       Impact factor: 2.616

7.  Response of the Anaerobic Methanotroph "Candidatus Methanoperedens nitroreducens" to Oxygen Stress.

Authors:  Simon Guerrero-Cruz; Geert Cremers; Theo A van Alen; Huub J M Op den Camp; Mike S M Jetten; Olivia Rasigraf; Annika Vaksmaa
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2018-11-30       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Methane yield phenotypes linked to differential gene expression in the sheep rumen microbiome.

Authors:  Weibing Shi; Christina D Moon; Sinead C Leahy; Dongwan Kang; Jeff Froula; Sandra Kittelmann; Christina Fan; Samuel Deutsch; Dragana Gagic; Henning Seedorf; William J Kelly; Renee Atua; Carrie Sang; Priya Soni; Dong Li; Cesar S Pinares-Patiño; John C McEwan; Peter H Janssen; Feng Chen; Axel Visel; Zhong Wang; Graeme T Attwood; Edward M Rubin
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2014-06-06       Impact factor: 9.043

9.  Methanogenesis in oxygenated soils is a substantial fraction of wetland methane emissions.

Authors:  Jordan C Angle; Timothy H Morin; Lindsey M Solden; Adrienne B Narrowe; Garrett J Smith; Mikayla A Borton; Camilo Rey-Sanchez; Rebecca A Daly; Golnazalsdat Mirfenderesgi; David W Hoyt; William J Riley; Christopher S Miller; Gil Bohrer; Kelly C Wrighton
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  In vivo activation of methyl-coenzyme M reductase by carbon monoxide.

Authors:  Yuzhen Zhou; Alexandria E Dorchak; Stephen W Ragsdale
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2013-04-01       Impact factor: 5.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.