BACKGROUND: Cervical cancer prevention should be provided as part of primary healthcare services for HIV-infected women but conventional screening programs are difficult to implement in low-resource settings. Here, we evaluate the efficacy among HIV-infected women of a simpler, screen-and-treat strategy in which all women with a positive screening test are treated withcryotherapy. METHODS: We conducted a randomized clinical trial of two screen-and-treat strategies among 6555 women in Cape Town, South Africa, among whom 956 were HIV-positive. Women were randomized to screen-and-treat utilizing either human papillomavirus DNA testing or visual inspection with acetic acid as the screening method or to a control group. Women were followed for up to 36 months after randomization with colposcopy and biopsy to determine the study endpoint of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or higher. RESULTS: In the control group, HIV-positive women had higher rates of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or higher detected by 36 months (14.9%) than HIV-negative women (4.6%) (P = 0.0006). Screen-and-treat utilizing human papillomavirus DNA testing significantly reduced cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or higher through 36 months in both HIV-positive (relative risk = 0.20, 95% confidence interval 0.06-0.69) and HIV-negative women (relative risk = 0.31, 95% confidence interval 0.20-0.50). Reductions in the visual inspection with acetic acid-and-treat group were less marked. Complications of cryotherapy were mostly minor and did not differ in frequency between HIV-positive and HIV-negative women. CONCLUSION:Screen-and-treat using human papillomavirus testing is a simple and effective method to reduce high-grade cervical cancer precursors in HIV-infected women.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND:Cervical cancer prevention should be provided as part of primary healthcare services for HIV-infectedwomen but conventional screening programs are difficult to implement in low-resource settings. Here, we evaluate the efficacy among HIV-infectedwomen of a simpler, screen-and-treat strategy in which all women with a positive screening test are treated with cryotherapy. METHODS: We conducted a randomized clinical trial of two screen-and-treat strategies among 6555 women in Cape Town, South Africa, among whom 956 were HIV-positive. Women were randomized to screen-and-treat utilizing either human papillomavirus DNA testing or visual inspection with acetic acid as the screening method or to a control group. Women were followed for up to 36 months after randomization with colposcopy and biopsy to determine the study endpoint of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or higher. RESULTS: In the control group, HIV-positive women had higher rates of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or higher detected by 36 months (14.9%) than HIV-negative women (4.6%) (P = 0.0006). Screen-and-treat utilizing human papillomavirus DNA testing significantly reduced cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or higher through 36 months in both HIV-positive (relative risk = 0.20, 95% confidence interval 0.06-0.69) and HIV-negative women (relative risk = 0.31, 95% confidence interval 0.20-0.50). Reductions in the visual inspection with acetic acid-and-treat group were less marked. Complications of cryotherapy were mostly minor and did not differ in frequency between HIV-positive and HIV-negative women. CONCLUSION: Screen-and-treat using human papillomavirus testing is a simple and effective method to reduce high-grade cervical cancer precursors in HIV-infectedwomen.
Authors: Pragna Patel; Charles E Rose; Pamela Y Collins; Bernardo Nuche-Berenguer; Vikrant V Sahasrabuddhe; Emmanuel Peprah; Susan Vorkoper; Sonak D Pastakia; Dianne Rausch; Naomi S Levitt Journal: AIDS Date: 2018-07-01 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Memory Bvochara-Nsingo; Surbhi Grover; David P Gierga; Remigio Makufa; Jason A Efstathiou; Nayha Dixit; Rebecca H Clayman; Anthony H Russell; Lilie L Lin; Joseph Kasese Journal: Oncologist Date: 2014-06-13
Authors: Deepa Reddy; Joseph Njala; Penny Stocker; Alan Schooley; Martiniano Flores; Chi-Hong Tseng; Colin Pfaff; Perry Jansen; Ronald T Mitsuyasu; Risa M Hoffman Journal: Int J STD AIDS Date: 2014-06-13 Impact factor: 1.359
Authors: Nicole G Campos; Jane J Kim; Philip E Castle; Jesse D Ortendahl; Meredith O'Shea; Mireia Diaz; Sue J Goldie Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2011-08-24 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Hilary K Whitham; Stephen E Hawes; Haitao Chu; J Michael Oakes; Alan R Lifson; Nancy B Kiviat; Papa Salif Sow; Geoffrey S Gottlieb; Selly Ba; Marie P Sy; Shalini L Kulasingam Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2017-05-17 Impact factor: 4.254