Literature DB >> 20705549

On the decay of distractor-response episodes.

Christian Frings1.   

Abstract

Distractor-to-distractor repetition effects can be explained by retrieval and/or inhibitory processes. Interestingly, the two accounts predict different effects from repeated distractors: Inhibition theories always predict benefits, whereas stimulus-response-retrieval theories predict an interaction of response repetition and distractor repetitions, resulting in benefits with response repetitions and costs with response changes. In the present experiment the time-course and the temporal separability of a stimulus-response episode on distractor-to-distractor repetitions were analyzed. The results showed that the interaction of response repetition and distractor repetitions was affected by a simple decay function. In addition, distractor repetition effects were affected by the temporal separability. In concert, the data yield evidence for retrieval-based explanations of distractor-to-distractor repetitions.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 20705549     DOI: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000077

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Psychol        ISSN: 1618-3169


  10 in total

Review 1.  Auditory distractor processing in sequential selection tasks.

Authors:  Christian Frings; Katja Kerstin Schneider; Birte Moeller
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2013-11-21

2.  Remember the touch: tactile distractors retrieve previous responses to targets.

Authors:  Birte Moeller; Christian Frings
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-08-07       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  David and Goliath-size does matter: size modulates feature-response binding of irrelevant features.

Authors:  Tarini Singh; Christian Frings
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2019-04-24

4.  Irrelevant stimuli and action control: analyzing the influence of ignored stimuli via the distractor-response binding paradigm.

Authors:  Birte Moeller; Hartmut Schächinger; Christian Frings
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2014-05-14       Impact factor: 1.355

5.  Long-term response-stimulus associations can influence distractor-response bindings.

Authors:  Birte Moeller; Christian Frings
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2014-06-26

6.  Early response activation in repetition priming: an LRP study.

Authors:  Christian Valt; Birgit Stürmer; Werner Sommer; Stephan Boehm
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Retrieval of bindings between task-irrelevant stimuli and responses can facilitate behaviour under conditions of high response certainty.

Authors:  Aidan J Horner
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2015-07-25       Impact factor: 2.143

8.  Temporal expectancy modulates stimulus-response integration.

Authors:  Philip Schmalbrock; Christian Frings
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-08-27       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Illuminating the prefrontal neural correlates of action sequence disassembling in response-response binding.

Authors:  Christoph F Geissler; Christian Frings; Birte Moeller
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-24       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Saccadic landing positions reveal that eye movements are affected by distractor-based retrieval.

Authors:  Lars-Michael Schöpper; Markus Lappe; Christian Frings
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 2.157

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.