Literature DB >> 20705390

Can robot-assisted radical prostatectomy still be considered a new technology pushed by marketers? The IDEAL evaluation.

Alexandre Mottrie, Vincenzo Ficarra.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2010        PMID： 20705390     DOI： 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.07.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN： 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


× No keyword cloud information.
  5 in total

1.  The surgical approach can be determined from the pathological specimen obtained after open or robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Sarah J Drouin; Eva Comperat; Justine Varinot; Christophe Vaessen; Marc-Olivier Bitker; Emmanuel Chartier-Kastler; Pierre Mozer; Shahrokh F Shariat; Olivier Cussenot; Morgan Rouprêt
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  [Radical prostatectomy. Detection and management of intra- and postoperative complications].

Authors:  M Saar; C H Ohlmann; M Janssen; M Stöckle; S Siemer
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  Retropubic versus robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy for prostate cancer: a comparative study of postoperative complications.

Authors:  Jeman Ryu; Taekmin Kwon; Yoon Soo Kyung; Sungwoo Hong; Dalsan You; In Gab Jeong; Choung-Soo Kim
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2013-11-06

4.  Dorsal penile nerve block for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy catheter related pain: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  Aaron C Weinberg; Solomon L Woldu; Ari Bergman; Arindam Roychoudhury; Trushar Patel; William Berg; Christel Wambi; Ketan K Badani
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2014-04-07

5.  Robotic-laparoscopic rectal cancer excision versus traditional laparoscopy.

Authors:  Michael S Tam; Mohammad Abbass; Maher A Abbas
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2014 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.