Literature DB >> 20704645

Sleep/wake measurement using a non-contact biomotion sensor.

Philip De Chazal1, Niall Fox, Emer O'Hare, Conor Heneghan, Alberto Zaffaroni, Patricia Boyle, Stephanie Smith, Caroline O'Connell, Walter T McNicholas.   

Abstract

We studied a novel non-contact biomotion sensor, which has been developed for identifying sleep/wake patterns in adult humans. The biomotion sensor uses ultra low-power reflected radiofrequency waves to determine the movement of a subject during sleep. An automated classification algorithm has been developed to recognize sleep/wake states on a 30-s epoch basis based on the measured movement signal. The sensor and software were evaluated against gold-standard polysomnography on a database of 113 subjects [94 male, 19 female, age 53±13years, apnoea-hypopnea index (AHI) 22±24] being assessed for sleep-disordered breathing at a hospital-based sleep laboratory. The overall per-subject accuracy was 78%, with a Cohen's kappa of 0.38. Lower accuracy was seen in a high AHI group (AHI >15, 63 subjects) than in a low AHI group (74.8% versus 81.3%); however, most of the change in accuracy can be explained by the lower sleep efficiency of the high AHI group. Averaged across subjects, the overall sleep sensitivity was 87.3% and the wake sensitivity was 50.1%. The automated algorithm slightly overestimated sleep efficiency (bias of +4.8%) and total sleep time (TST; bias of +19min on an average TST of 288min). We conclude that the non-contact biomotion sensor can provide a valid means of measuring sleep-wake patterns in this patient population, and also allows direct visualization of respiratory movement signals.
© 2010 European Sleep Research Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20704645     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2869.2010.00876.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sleep Res        ISSN: 0962-1105            Impact factor:   3.981


  21 in total

1.  EOG-based auto-staging: less is more.

Authors:  Christian Berthomier; Marie Brandewinder
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2015-02-06       Impact factor: 2.816

2.  A comparison of radio-frequency biomotion sensors and actigraphy versus polysomnography for the assessment of sleep in normal subjects.

Authors:  Emer O'Hare; David Flanagan; Thomas Penzel; Carmen Garcia; Daniela Frohberg; Conor Heneghan
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 2.816

3.  Validation of the Sonomat: a contactless monitoring system used for the diagnosis of sleep disordered breathing.

Authors:  Mark B Norman; Sally Middleton; Odette Erskine; Peter G Middleton; John R Wheatley; Colin E Sullivan
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2014-09-01       Impact factor: 5.849

4.  Validation of a non-contact screening device for the combination of sleep-disordered breathing and periodic limb movements in sleep.

Authors:  Gerhard Weinreich; Sarah Terjung; Yi Wang; Stefanie Werther; Alberto Zaffaroni; Helmut Teschler
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 2.816

5.  Noncontact Pressure-Based Sleep/Wake Discrimination.

Authors:  Lorcan Walsh; Sean McLoone; Joseph Ronda; Jeanne F Duffy; Charles A Czeisler
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 4.538

6.  Health-Enabling and Ambient Assistive Technologies: Past, Present, Future.

Authors:  R Haux; S Koch; N H Lovell; M Marschollek; N Nakashima; K-H Wolf
Journal:  Yearb Med Inform       Date:  2016-06-30

7.  Sleep Validity of a Non-Contact Bedside Movement and Respiration-Sensing Device.

Authors:  Margeaux M Schade; Christopher E Bauer; Billie R Murray; Luke Gahan; Emer P Doheny; Hannah Kilroy; Alberto Zaffaroni; Hawley E Montgomery-Downs
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2019-07-15       Impact factor: 4.062

Review 8.  Integrating sleep, neuroimaging, and computational approaches for precision psychiatry.

Authors:  Andrea N Goldstein-Piekarski; Bailey Holt-Gosselin; Kathleen O'Hora; Leanne M Williams
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2019-08-19       Impact factor: 7.853

9.  Impacts of the urinary sodium-to-potassium ratio, sleep efficiency, and conventional risk factors on home hypertension in a general Japanese population.

Authors:  Takumi Hirata; Mana Kogure; Naho Tsuchiya; Ken Miyagawa; Akira Narita; Kotaro Nochioka; Akira Uruno; Taku Obara; Tomohiro Nakamura; Naoki Nakaya; Hirohito Metoki; Masahiro Kikuya; Junichi Sugawara; Shinichi Kuriyama; Ichiro Tsuji; Shigeo Kure; Atsushi Hozawa
Journal:  Hypertens Res       Date:  2021-02-15       Impact factor: 3.872

10.  Recent developments in home sleep-monitoring devices.

Authors:  Jessica M Kelly; Robert E Strecker; Matt T Bianchi
Journal:  ISRN Neurol       Date:  2012-10-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.