Literature DB >> 20703473

Abdominal resection rectopexy with an absorbable polyglactin mesh: prospective evaluation of morphological and functional changes with consecutive improvement of patient's symptoms.

S D Otto1, J P Ritz, J Gröne, H J Buhr, A J Kroesen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The pathophysiology of rectal prolapse and intussusception has not yet been clarified. This is reflected in the multiplicity of surgical procedures. The aim of this prospective study was to measure morphological and functional changes of the pelvic floor and the rectum before and after resection rectopexy.
METHODS: A total of 21 patients (mean age 60 years; 2 men, 19 women) with manifest rectal prolapse and rectoanal intussusception underwent sigmoidectomy and rectopexy with an absorbable polyglactin mesh graft. The following analyses were performed preoperatively and, on average, 15 months (range 6-21 month) postoperatively: radiologic defecography, rectal volumetry, sphincter manometry, and evaluation of clinical symptoms.
RESULTS: Postoperatively there was no patient with rectal prolapse, and only one with an intussusception. Rectal compliance increased from 6.4 to 10.2 ml/mmHg. Rectal volumetry showed a decrease of the thresholds for the sensation of "desire to defecate" and "maximal tolerated volume" (100-75 ml, 175-150 ml). Postoperatively, there was a higher level of the pelvic floor during contraction. The anorectal angle, vector volume, radial asymmetry, sphincter length, and resting and squeezing pressures were unchanged. Surgery improved rectal evacuation (p = 0.03), continence (p = 0.01), stool consistency (p = 0.03), and warning period (p = 0.01). Patients' personal assessment showed an improved overall satisfaction.
CONCLUSIONS: Resection rectopexy is a reliable method for treating rectal prolapse and rectoanal intussusception with clear improvement of the patient's clinical symptoms. The restored anorectal function can be attributed to improved rectal compliance, a lower sensory threshold, an elevation of the pelvic floor during squeezing, and an improved rectal evacuation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20703473     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-010-0735-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  34 in total

1.  [Can continence function after rectal resection be prognostically estimated?].

Authors:  U Stadelmaier; B Bittorf; M Meyer; W Hohenberger; K E Matzel
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 2.  Intussusception of the rectum and the solitary ulcer syndrome.

Authors:  T Ihre
Journal:  Ann Med       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 4.709

3.  Functional results of laparoscopic resection rectopexy for symptomatic rectal intussusception.

Authors:  Michael von Papen; Luai H S Ashari; John W Lumley; Andrew R L Stevenson; Russell W Stitz
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 4.585

4.  Laparoscopic ventral recto(colpo)pexy for rectal prolapse: surgical technique and outcome for 109 patients.

Authors:  A D'Hoore; F Penninckx
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Comparison of three perineal procedures for the treatment of rectal prolapse.

Authors:  F Agachan; P Reissman; J Pfeifer; E G Weiss; J J Nogueras; S D Wexner
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 0.954

6.  Procidentia: definitive corrective surgery.

Authors:  C B Ripstein
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1972 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.585

7.  Stapled transanal rectal resection versus stapled anopexy in the cure of hemorrhoids associated with rectal prolapse. A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Paolo Boccasanta; Marco Venturi; Giancarlo Roviaro
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2006-10-05       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Clinical and manometric features of the solitary rectal ulcer syndrome.

Authors:  M R Keighley; P Shouler
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 4.585

9.  Results, outcome predictors, and complications after stapled transanal rectal resection for obstructed defecation.

Authors:  Giuseppe Gagliardi; Mario Pescatori; Donato F Altomare; Gian Andrea Binda; Corrado Bottini; Giuseppe Dodi; Vincenzino Filingeri; Giovanni Milito; Marcella Rinaldi; Giovanni Romano; Liana Spazzafumo; Mario Trompetto
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2007-12-22       Impact factor: 4.585

10.  Resection rectopexy for external rectal prolapse reduces constipation and anal incontinence.

Authors:  E Johnson; A Stangeland; H O Johannessen; E Carlsen
Journal:  Scand J Surg       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.360

View more
  5 in total

1.  Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy in patients with fecal incontinence associated with rectoanal intussusception: prospective evaluation of clinical, physiological and morphological changes.

Authors:  A Tsunoda; T Takahashi; K Hayashi; Y Yagi; H Kusanagi
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 2.  Functional Disorders: Rectoanal Intussusception.

Authors:  Kristen Blaker; Joselin L Anandam
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2017-02

3.  Combined Burch urethropexy and anterior rectopexy in pelvic organ prolapse: skip the mesh.

Authors:  Daniele Pironi; Stefano Pontone; Vlasta Podzemny; Alessandra Panarese; Maurizio Vendettuoli; Domenico Mascagni; Angelo Filippini
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2012-08-17       Impact factor: 3.445

4.  [Pelvic floor disorders from the surgeon's viewpoint].

Authors:  T H Schiedeck
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 0.955

5.  Laparoscopic rectopexy for complete rectal prolapse: mesh, no mesh or a ventral mesh?

Authors:  Deepraj S Bhandarkar
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 1.407

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.