Literature DB >> 29956002

Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy in patients with fecal incontinence associated with rectoanal intussusception: prospective evaluation of clinical, physiological and morphological changes.

A Tsunoda1, T Takahashi2, K Hayashi2, Y Yagi2, H Kusanagi2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Physiological changes after laparoscopic ventral rectopexy (LVR) in patients with rectoanal intussusception (RAI) remain unclear. This study was undertaken to evaluate physiological and morphological changes after LVR for RAI, and to study clinical outcomes following LVR with special reference to fecal incontinence (FI).
METHODS: The study was conducted on patients who had LVR for RAI between February 2012 and December 2016 at our institution Patients with RAI and FI were included in the study. Patients with RAI and obstructed defecation and those with RAI and neurologic FI were not included. The patients had anorectal manometry preoperatively, and 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Defecography was performed before and 6 months after the procedure. FI was evaluated using the Fecal Incontinence Severity Index (FISI).
RESULTS: There were 34 patients (median age 77 years (range 60-93) years). Thirty-two patients (94%) were female and the median number of vaginal deliveries was 2 (range 0-5). Neither maximum resting pressure nor maximum squeeze pressure increased postoperatively. There was an overall increase in both defecatory desire volume (median preoperative 75 ml vs. 90 ml at 12 months; p = 0.002) and maximum tolerated volume (median preoperative 145 ml vs.175 ml at 12 months; p = 0.002). Postoperatively, RAI was eliminated in all patients but one, although 13 had residual rectorectal intussusception found at defecography. There was an overall reduction in both rectocele size (median preop 29 mm vs. postop 10 mm; p = 0.008) and pelvic floor descent (median preop 26 mm vs. postop 20 mm; p = 0.005). Twelve months after surgery, a reduction of at least 50% was observed in the FISI score for 31 incontinent patients (91%).
CONCLUSIONS: LVR for RAI produced adequate improvement of FI, and successful anatomical correction of RAI was confirmed by postoperative proctography. Postoperative increase in the rectal volume may have a positive effect on continence.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anorectal manometry; Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy; Rectoanal intussusception

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29956002     DOI: 10.1007/s10151-018-1811-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tech Coloproctol        ISSN: 1123-6337            Impact factor:   3.781


  29 in total

1.  Fecal incontinence: etiology, evaluation, and treatment.

Authors:  Dana M Hayden; Eric G Weiss
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2011-03

2.  Patient and surgeon ranking of the severity of symptoms associated with fecal incontinence: the fecal incontinence severity index.

Authors:  T H Rockwood; J M Church; J W Fleshman; R L Kane; C Mavrantonis; A G Thorson; S D Wexner; D Bliss; A C Lowry
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.585

3.  Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for rectoanal intussusception: postoperative evaluation with proctography.

Authors:  Akira Tsunoda; Tomoyuki Ohta; Yoshiyuki Kiyasu; Hiroshi Kusanagi
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.585

4.  Perineal proctectomy, posterior rectopexy, and postanal levator repair for the treatment of rectal prolapse.

Authors:  M L Prasad; R K Pearl; H Abcarian; C P Orsay; R L Nelson
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 4.585

5.  What are the symptoms of internal rectal prolapse?

Authors:  N A T Wijffels; O M Jones; C Cunningham; W A Bemelman; I Lindsey
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 3.788

6.  Sacral neuromodulation for faecal incontinence: is the outcome compromised in patients with high-grade internal rectal prolapse?

Authors:  Siriluck Prapasrivorakul; Martijn P Gosselink; Martijn Gosselink; Kim J Gorissen; Simona Fourie; Roel Hompes; Oliver M Jones; Chris Cunningham; Ian Lindsey
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2014-11-30       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Long-term outcome of laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for total rectal prolapse.

Authors:  A D'Hoore; R Cadoni; F Penninckx
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for rectal prolapse and symptomatic rectocele: an analysis of 245 consecutive patients.

Authors:  H A Formijne Jonkers; N Poierrié; W A Draaisma; I A M J Broeders; E C J Consten
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.788

9.  Continence is improved after the Ripstein rectopexy. Different mechanizms in rectal prolapse and rectal intussusception?

Authors:  I Schultz; A Mellgren; A Dolk; C Johansson; B Holmström
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 4.585

Review 10.  Defecography. Results of investigations in 2,816 patients.

Authors:  A Mellgren; S Bremmer; C Johansson; A Dolk; R Udén; S O Ahlbäck; B Holmström
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 4.585

View more
  5 in total

1.  In search of the optimal operation for rectal prolapse: the saga continues….

Authors:  W C Cirocco
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 2.  Ventral Prosthesis Rectopexy for obstructed defaecation syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Dimitrios K Manatakis; Nikolaos Gouvas; George Pechlivanides; Evangelos Xynos
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2021-10-19

3.  Stepped-wedge randomized controlled trial of laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy in adults with chronic constipation.

Authors:  U Grossi; J Lacy-Colson; S R Brown; S Cross; S Eldridge; M Jordan; J Mason; C Norton; S M Scott; N Stevens; S Taheri; C H Knowles
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 3.699

4.  A prospective pilot study on MRI visibility of iron oxide-impregnated polyvinylidene fluoride mesh after ventral rectopexy.

Authors:  K E Laitakari; J K Mäkelä-Kaikkonen; E Pääkkö; P Ohtonen; T T Rautio
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 5.  Mesh-related complications and recurrence after ventral mesh rectopexy with synthetic versus biologic mesh: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  E M van der Schans; M A Boom; M El Moumni; P M Verheijen; I A M J Broeders; E C J Consten
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 3.781

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.