Literature DB >> 20702927

A study on repainting strategies for treating moderately moving targets with proton pencil beam scanning at the new Gantry 2 at PSI.

S M Zenklusen1, E Pedroni, D Meer.   

Abstract

Treating moving targets using a scanning gantry for proton therapy is a promising but very challenging, not yet clinically demonstrated treatment modality. The interference of organ motion with the sequence of the beam delivery produces uncontrolled dose inhomogeneities within the target. One promising approach to overcome this difficulty is to increase the speed of scanning in order to apply the dose repeatedly (so-called repainting). To obtain sufficiently high scanning speeds a new, technologically improved gantry-Gantry 2-has been designed and is currently under construction at PSI. As there are many possible repainting strategies, the way repainting will be implemented on Gantry 2 will depend on the result of a careful analysis of the various treatment delivery strategies available. To achieve this aim, and prior to the start of experimental work with Gantry 2, simulations of dose distribution errors due to organ motion under various beam delivery strategies were investigated. The effects of motion on the dose distribution were studied for moderate motion amplitudes (5 mm) for spherical target volumes in a homogeneous medium and with homogeneous dose. In total over 200,000 dose distributions have been simulated and analyzed and selected results are discussed. From the obtained results we are confident to be able to treat moderately moving targets on Gantry 2 using repainted pencil-beam spot scanning. Continuous line scanning seems to be the most elegant solution; it provides higher repainting rates and produces superior results but is probably more difficult to realize. For larger motion amplitudes, continuous line scanning still shows good results, but we plan anyways to use a gating system for these cases, not only to reduce the inhomogeneity within the target volume but also to reduce safety margins.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20702927     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/55/17/014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  35 in total

Review 1.  Treatment planning optimisation in proton therapy.

Authors:  S E McGowan; N G Burnet; A J Lomax
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 2.  Current status and future prospects of multi-dimensional image-guided particle therapy.

Authors:  Shinichiro Mori; Silvan Zenklusen; Antje-Christin Knopf
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2013-02-19

3.  Evaluation and mitigation of the interplay effects of intensity modulated proton therapy for lung cancer in a clinical setting.

Authors:  Laleh Kardar; Yupeng Li; Xiaoqiang Li; Heng Li; Wenhua Cao; Joe Y Chang; Li Liao; Ronald X Zhu; Narayan Sahoo; Michael Gillin; Zhongxing Liao; Ritsuko Komaki; James D Cox; Gino Lim; Xiaodong Zhang
Journal:  Pract Radiat Oncol       Date:  2014-08-12

Review 4.  Empowering Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy Through Physics and Technology: An Overview.

Authors:  Radhe Mohan; Indra J Das; Clifton C Ling
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2017-10-01       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  Dynamically accumulated dose and 4D accumulated dose for moving tumors.

Authors:  Heng Li; Yupeng Li; Xiaodong Zhang; Xiaoqiang Li; Wei Liu; Michael T Gillin; X Ronald Zhu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Impact of Spot Size and Spacing on the Quality of Robustly Optimized Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy Plans for Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Chenbin Liu; Steven E Schild; Joe Y Chang; Zhongxing Liao; Shawn Korte; Jiajian Shen; Xiaoning Ding; Yanle Hu; Yixiu Kang; Sameer R Keole; Terence T Sio; William W Wong; Narayan Sahoo; Martin Bues; Wei Liu
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  Interplay effects in proton scanning for lung: a 4D Monte Carlo study assessing the impact of tumor and beam delivery parameters.

Authors:  S Dowdell; C Grassberger; G C Sharp; H Paganetti
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-05-20       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  The rationale for intensity-modulated proton therapy in geometrically challenging cases.

Authors:  S Safai; A Trofimov; J A Adams; M Engelsman; T Bortfeld
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-08-22       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 9.  The Practicality of ICRU and Considerations for Future ICRU Definitions.

Authors:  Annemarie Shepherd; Sara St James; Ramesh Rengan
Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 5.934

10.  Lung Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) Using Spot-Scanning Proton Arc (SPArc) Therapy: A Feasibility Study.

Authors:  Gang Liu; Lewei Zhao; An Qin; Inga Grills; Rohan Deraniyagala; Craig Stevens; Sheng Zhang; Di Yan; Xiaoqiang Li; Xuanfeng Ding
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 6.244

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.