Literature DB >> 20701278

An improved method for estimating in situ sampling rates of nonpolar passive samplers.

Kees Booij1, Foppe Smedes.   

Abstract

The quality of passive sampling methods for measuring concentrations of dissolved hydrophobic contaminants relies on accurate knowledge of in situ sampling rates. In currently used methods for estimating these sampling rates from the dissipation rates of performance reference compounds (PRCs), the PRCs that show either insignificant or complete dissipation are ignored. We explored the merits of nonlinear least-squares (NLS) methods for estimating sampling rates, aiming to retain the information stored in PRC data that is neglected in the traditional methods. To this end, we examined the error structure of weighted NLS, unweighted NLS, and the traditional methods, using model simulations. The results show that sampling rates are best estimated using unweighted NLS. Uncertainties in the sampler-water partition coefficients may result in biased estimates that only weakly depend on the number of PRCs being used. The major advantage of unweighted NLS over the traditional method is that sampling rate estimates and uncertainties are available where the traditional method fails, and that the variability of sampling rate estimates is smaller.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20701278     DOI: 10.1021/es101321v

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  25 in total

1.  Use of passive sampling devices for monitoring and compliance checking of POP concentrations in water.

Authors:  Rainer Lohmann; Kees Booij; Foppe Smedes; Branislav Vrana
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Significant spatial variability of bioavailable PAHs in water column and sediment porewater in the Gulf of Mexico 1 year after the Deepwater Horizon oil spill.

Authors:  Yongseok Hong; Dana Wetzel; Erin L Pulster; Pete Hull; Danny Reible; Hyun-Min Hwang; Pan Ji; Erik Rifkin; Edward Bouwer
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Environmental and individual PAH exposures near rural natural gas extraction.

Authors:  L Blair Paulik; Kevin A Hobbie; Diana Rohlman; Brian W Smith; Richard P Scott; Laurel Kincl; Erin N Haynes; Kim A Anderson
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 8.071

4.  Application of the triolein-embedded cellulose acetate membrane passive sampler for monitoring of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in water.

Authors:  Jianfeng Tang; Guiying He; Gang Li
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  The organic pollutant status of rivers in Bosnia and Herzegovina as determined by a combination of active and passive sampling methods.

Authors:  Christopher Harman; Merete Grung; Jasmina Djedjibegovic; Aleksandra Marjanovic; Eirik Fjeld; Hans Fredrik Veiteberg Braaten; Miroslav Sober; Thorjørn Larssen; Sissel Brit Ranneklev
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2018-04-15       Impact factor: 2.513

6.  Monitoring of organic pollutants in marine environment by semipermeable membrane devices and mussels: accumulation and biochemical responses.

Authors:  Oya S Okay; Burak Karacık; Abbas Güngördü; Atilla Yılmaz; Nazmi C Koyunbaba; Sevil D Yakan; Bernhard Henkelmann; Karl-Werner Schramm; Murat Ozmen
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 4.223

7.  Assessment of bioavailable fraction of POPS in surface water bodies in Johannesburg City, South Africa, using passive samplers: an initial assessment.

Authors:  Robert Amdany; Luke Chimuka; Ewa Cukrowska; Petr Kukučka; Jiří Kohoutek; Peter Tölgyessy; Branislav Vrana
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2014-05-29       Impact factor: 2.513

8.  Investigation of cosolvent application to enhance POPs' mass transfer in partitioning passive sampling in sediment.

Authors:  Michaela Belháčová-Minaříková; Tatsiana Rusina; Foppe Smedes; Branislav Vrana
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-10-02       Impact factor: 4.223

9.  Using performance reference compounds to compare mass transfer calibration methodologies in passive samplers deployed in the water column.

Authors:  Abigail S Joyce; Robert M Burgess
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2018-07-13       Impact factor: 3.742

10.  Bridging environmental mixtures and toxic effects.

Authors:  Sarah E Allan; Brian W Smith; Robert L Tanguay; Kim A Anderson
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 3.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.