Literature DB >> 22767286

Use of passive sampling devices for monitoring and compliance checking of POP concentrations in water.

Rainer Lohmann1, Kees Booij, Foppe Smedes, Branislav Vrana.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The state of the art of passive water sampling of (nonpolar) organic contaminants is presented. Its suitability for regulatory monitoring is discussed, with an emphasis on the information yielded by passive sampling devices (PSDs), their relevance and associated uncertainties. Almost all persistent organic pollutants (POPs) targeted by the Stockholm Convention are nonpolar or weakly polar, hydrophobic substances, making them ideal targets for sampling in water using PSDs. Widely used nonpolar PSDs include semi-permeable membrane devices, low-density polyethylene and silicone rubber. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The inter-laboratory variation of equilibrium partition constants between PSD and water is mostly 0.2-0.5 log units, depending on the exact matrix used. The sampling rate of PSDs is best determined by using performance reference compounds during field deployment. The major advantage of PSDs over alternative matrices applicable in trend monitoring (e.g. sediments or biota) is that the various sources of variance including analytical variance and natural environmental variance can be much better controlled, which in turn results in a reduction of the number of analysed samples required to obtain results with comparable statistical power.
CONCLUSION: Compliance checking with regulatory limits and analysis of temporal and spatial contaminant trends are two possible fields of application. In contrast to the established use of nonpolar PSDs, polar samplers are insufficiently understood, but research is in progress to develop PSDs for the quantitative assessment of polar waterborne contaminants. In summary, PSD-based monitoring is a mature technique for the measurement of aqueous concentrations of apolar POPs, with a well-defined accuracy and precision.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22767286     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-012-0748-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  42 in total

1.  Comment on "Assessment of PDMS-water partition coefficients: implications for passive environmental sampling of hydrophobic compounds".

Authors:  Hans Peter H Arp; Satoshi Endo; Kai-Uwe Goss
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2010-10-21       Impact factor: 9.028

2.  Equilibrium partition coefficients of diverse polar and nonpolar organic compounds to polyoxymethylene (POM) passive sampling devices.

Authors:  Satoshi Endo; Sarah E Hale; Kai-Uwe Goss; Hans Peter H Arp
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  Environmental monitoring of hydrophobic organic contaminants: the case of mussels versus semipermeable membrane devices.

Authors:  Kees Booij; Foppe Smedes; Evaline M van Weerlee; Pieter J C Honkoop
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2006-06-15       Impact factor: 9.028

4.  Modelling and field application of the Chemcatcher passive sampler calibration data for the monitoring of hydrophobic organic pollutants in water.

Authors:  Branislav Vrana; Graham A Mills; Michiel Kotterman; Pim Leonards; Kees Booij; Richard Greenwood
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2006-08-21       Impact factor: 8.071

5.  Using performance reference compounds in polyethylene passive samplers to deduce sediment porewater concentrations for numerous target chemicals.

Authors:  Loretta A Fernandez; Charles F Harvey; Philip M Gschwend
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 9.028

6.  Identifying the research and infrastructure needs for the global assessment of hazardous chemicals ten years after establishing the Stockholm Convention.

Authors:  Jana Klánová; Miriam Diamond; Kevin Jones; Gerhard Lammel; Rainer Lohmann; Nicola Pirrone; Martin Scheringer; Catia Balducci; Terry Bidleman; Karel Bláha; Ludĕk Bláha; Kees Booij; Henk Bouwman; Knut Breivik; Sabine Eckhardt; Heidelore Fiedler; Philippe Garrigues; Tom Harner; Ivan Holoubek; Hayley Hung; Matthew MacLeod; Katarina Magulova; Silvia Mosca; Alberto Pistocchi; Staci Simonich; Foppe Smedes; Euripides Stephanou; Andy Sweetman; Katerina Sebková; Marta Venier; Marco Vighi; Branislav Vrana; Frank Wania; Roland Weber; Peter Weiss
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2011-08-19       Impact factor: 9.028

7.  Using solid phase micro extraction to determine salting-out (Setschenow) constants for hydrophobic organic chemicals.

Authors:  Michiel T O Jonker; Barry Muijs
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 7.086

8.  Polymer selection for passive sampling: a comparison of critical properties.

Authors:  Tatsiana P Rusina; Foppe Smedes; Jana Klanova; Kees Booij; Ivan Holoubek
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2007-02-28       Impact factor: 7.086

9.  Measurement of freely dissolved PAH concentrations in sediment beds using passive sampling with low-density polyethylene strips.

Authors:  Loretta A Fernandez; John K MacFarlane; Alexandra P Tcaciuc; Philip M Gschwend
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2009-03-01       Impact factor: 9.028

10.  Dissolved PCBs, PAHs, and HCB in pore waters and overlying waters of contaminated harbor sediments.

Authors:  Kees Booij; José R Hoedemaker; Joop F Bakker
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2003-09-15       Impact factor: 9.028

View more
  18 in total

1.  Field-testing polyethylene passive samplers for the detection of neutral polyfluorinated alkyl substances in air and water.

Authors:  Erik Dixon-Anderson; Rainer Lohmann
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2018-11-05       Impact factor: 3.742

2.  Evaluations of combined zebrafish (Danio rerio) embryo and marine phytoplankton (Diacronema lutheri) toxicity of dissolved organic contaminants in the Ythan catchment, Scotland, UK.

Authors:  Emmanuel S Emelogu; Thomas-Benjamin Seiler; Pat Pollard; Craig D Robinson; Lynda Webster; Craig McKenzie; Sebastian Heger; Henner Hollert; Eileen Bresnan; Jennifer Best; Colin F Moffat
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-01-10       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Field application of passive SBSE for the monitoring of pesticides in surface waters.

Authors:  A Assoumani; M Coquery; L Liger; N Mazzella; C Margoum
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-09-19       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Groundwater sampling in karst terranes: passive sampling in comparison to event-driven sampling strategy.

Authors:  Malcolm S Field
Journal:  Hydrogeol J       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 3.178

5.  Study of persistent toxic pollutants in a river basin-ecotoxicological risk assessment.

Authors:  Evangelia Terzopoulou; Dimitra Voutsa
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2017-04-05       Impact factor: 2.823

6.  Air and seawater pollution and air-sea gas exchange of persistent toxic substances in the Aegean Sea: spatial trends of PAHs, PCBs, OCPs and PBDEs.

Authors:  Gerhard Lammel; Ondřej Audy; Athanasios Besis; Christos Efstathiou; Kostas Eleftheriadis; Jiři Kohoutek; Petr Kukučka; Marie D Mulder; Petra Přibylová; Roman Prokeš; Tatsiana P Rusina; Constantini Samara; Aysun Sofuoglu; Sait C Sofuoglu; Yücel Taşdemir; Vassiliki Vassilatou; Dimitra Voutsa; Branislav Vrana
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 4.223

7.  Active and passive sampling for the assessment of hydrophilic organic contaminants in a river basin-ecotoxicological risk assessment.

Authors:  Evangelia Terzopoulou; Dimitra Voutsa
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 8.  Critical review of factors governing data quality of integrative samplers employed in environmental water monitoring.

Authors:  Isaac B Roll; Rolf U Halden
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 11.236

9.  Simulation of aromatic polycyclic hydrocarbons remobilization from a river sediment using laboratory experiments supported by passive sampling techniques.

Authors:  Angel Belles; Yannick Mamindy-Pajany; Claire Alary
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-09-29       Impact factor: 4.223

10.  Adapting current model with field data of related performance reference compounds in passive samplers to accurately monitor hydrophobic organic compounds in aqueous media.

Authors:  Pokem Temoka; Gerd Pfister; Bernhard Henkelmann; Karl-Werner Schramm
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2017-10-07       Impact factor: 2.513

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.