PURPOSE: We assessed test-retest variability of cerebral blood flow (CBF), cerebral blood volume (CBV), cerebral metabolic rate of oxygen (CMRO(2)), and oxygen extraction fraction (OEF) measurements derived from dynamic (15)O positron emission tomography (PET) scans. PROCEDURES: In seven healthy volunteers, complete test-retest (15)O PET studies were obtained; test-retest variability and left-to-right ratios of CBF, CBV, OEF, and CMRO(2) in arterial flow territories were calculated. RESULTS: Whole-brain test-retest coefficients of variation for CBF, CBV, CMRO(2), and OEF were 8.8%, 13.8%, 5.3%, and 9.3%, respectively. Test-retest variability of CBV left-to-right ratios was <7.4% across all territories. Corresponding values for CBF, CMRO(2), and OEF were better, i.e., <4.5%, <4.0%, and <1.4%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The test-retest variability of CMRO(2) measurements derived from dynamic (15)O PET scans is comparable to within-session test-retest variability derived from steady-state (15)O PET scans. Excellent regional test-retest variability was observed for CBF, CMRO(2), and OEF. Variability of absolute CBF and OEF measurements is probably affected by physiological day-to-day variability of CBF.
PURPOSE: We assessed test-retest variability of cerebral blood flow (CBF), cerebral blood volume (CBV), cerebral metabolic rate of oxygen (CMRO(2)), and oxygen extraction fraction (OEF) measurements derived from dynamic (15)O positron emission tomography (PET) scans. PROCEDURES: In seven healthy volunteers, complete test-retest (15)O PET studies were obtained; test-retest variability and left-to-right ratios of CBF, CBV, OEF, and CMRO(2) in arterial flow territories were calculated. RESULTS: Whole-brain test-retest coefficients of variation for CBF, CBV, CMRO(2), and OEF were 8.8%, 13.8%, 5.3%, and 9.3%, respectively. Test-retest variability of CBV left-to-right ratios was <7.4% across all territories. Corresponding values for CBF, CMRO(2), and OEF were better, i.e., <4.5%, <4.0%, and <1.4%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The test-retest variability of CMRO(2) measurements derived from dynamic (15)O PET scans is comparable to within-session test-retest variability derived from steady-state (15)O PET scans. Excellent regional test-retest variability was observed for CBF, CMRO(2), and OEF. Variability of absolute CBF and OEF measurements is probably affected by physiological day-to-day variability of CBF.
Authors: Yi-Fen Yen; Aaron S Field; Eric M Martin; Narter Ari; Jonathan H Burdette; Dixon M Moody; Atsushi M Takahashi Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2002-05 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Ronald Boellaard; Paul Knaapen; Abraham Rijbroek; Gert J J Luurtsema; Adriaan A Lammertsma Journal: Mol Imaging Biol Date: 2005 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 3.488
Authors: N M Alpert; L Eriksson; J Y Chang; M Bergstrom; J E Litton; J A Correia; C Bohm; R H Ackerman; J M Taveras Journal: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Date: 1984-03 Impact factor: 6.200
Authors: Naoya Hattori; Marvin Bergsneider; Hsiao-Ming Wu; Thomas C Glenn; Paul M Vespa; David A Hovda; Michael E Phelps; Sung-Cheng Huang Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2004-05 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Audrey P Fan; Berkin Bilgic; Louis Gagnon; Thomas Witzel; Himanshu Bhat; Bruce R Rosen; Elfar Adalsteinsson Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2013-09-04 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Sophie Schmid; Dennis F R Heijtel; Henri J M M Mutsaerts; Ronald Boellaard; Adriaan A Lammertsma; Aart J Nederveen; Matthias J P van Osch Journal: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Date: 2015-03-18 Impact factor: 6.200