Literature DB >> 20700648

Diagnosis of second breast cancer events after initial diagnosis of early stage breast cancer.

Diana S M Buist1, Linn A Abraham, William E Barlow, Arun Krishnaraj, Regan C Holdridge, Edward A Sickles, Patricia A Carney, Karla Kerlikowske, Berta M Geller.   

Abstract

To examine whether there are any characteristics of women or their initial tumors that might be useful for tailoring surveillance recommendations to optimize outcomes. We followed 17,286 women for up to 5 years after an initial diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) or early stage (I/II) invasive breast cancer diagnosed between 1996 and 2006. We calculated rates per 1,000 women years of recurrences and second breast primaries relative to demographics, risk factors, and characteristics of initial diagnosis: stage, treatment, mode of initial diagnosis. Nearly 4% had a second breast cancer event (314 recurrences and 344 second breast primaries). Women who used adjuvant hormonal therapy or were ≥ 80 years had the lowest rates of second events. Factors associated with higher recurrence and second primary rates included: initial DCIS or stage IIB, estrogen/progesterone receptor-negative, younger women (<50 years). Women with a family history or greater breast density had higher second primary rates, and women who received breast conserving surgery without radiation had higher recurrence rates. Roughly one-third of recurrences (37.6%) and second primaries (36.3%) were not screen-detected. Initial mode of diagnosis was a predictor of second events after adjusting for age, stage, primary treatment, and breast density. A recent negative mammogram should not falsely reassure physicians or women with new breast symptoms or changes because one-third of second cancers were interval cancers. This study does not provide any evidence in support of changing surveillance intervals for different subgroups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20700648      PMCID: PMC2976764          DOI: 10.1007/s10549-010-1106-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  32 in total

1.  Effect of variations in operational definitions on performance estimates for screening mammography.

Authors:  R D Rosenberg; B C Yankaskas; W C Hunt; R Ballard-Barbash; N Urban; V L Ernster; K Kerlikowske; B Geller; P A Carney; S Taplin
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.173

2.  Association between mammography timing and measures of screening performance in the United States.

Authors:  Bonnie C Yankaskas; Stephen H Taplin; Laura Ichikawa; Berta M Geller; Robert D Rosenberg; Patricia A Carney; Karla Kerlikowske; Rachel Ballard-Barbash; Gary R Cutter; William E Barlow
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 3.  Effects of radiotherapy and of differences in the extent of surgery for early breast cancer on local recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials.

Authors:  M Clarke; R Collins; S Darby; C Davies; P Elphinstone; V Evans; J Godwin; R Gray; C Hicks; S James; E MacKinnon; P McGale; T McHugh; R Peto; C Taylor; Y Wang
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005-12-17       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  The use of mammography by survivors of breast cancer.

Authors:  M R Andersen; N Urban
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Fifteen-year prognostic discriminants for invasive breast carcinoma: National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocol-06.

Authors:  E R Fisher; S Anderson; E Tan-Chiu; B Fisher; L Eaton; N Wolmark
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2001-04-15       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 6.  Follow-up strategies for women treated for early breast cancer.

Authors:  M P Rojas; E Telaro; A Russo; I Moschetti; L Coe; R Fossati; D Palli; Turco M del Roselli; A Liberati
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2005-01-25

7.  Lumpectomy compared with lumpectomy and radiation therapy for the treatment of intraductal breast cancer.

Authors:  B Fisher; J Costantino; C Redmond; E Fisher; R Margolese; N Dimitrov; N Wolmark; D L Wickerham; M Deutsch; L Ore
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-06-03       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Role of detection method in predicting breast cancer survival: analysis of randomized screening trials.

Authors:  Yu Shen; Ying Yang; Lurdes Y T Inoue; Mark F Munsell; Anthony B Miller; Donald A Berry
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2005-08-17       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  Early detection of second breast cancers improves prognosis in breast cancer survivors.

Authors:  N Houssami; S Ciatto; F Martinelli; R Bonardi; S W Duffy
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2009-03-17       Impact factor: 32.976

10.  MRI evaluation of the contralateral breast in women with recently diagnosed breast cancer.

Authors:  Constance D Lehman; Constantine Gatsonis; Christiane K Kuhl; R Edward Hendrick; Etta D Pisano; Lucy Hanna; Sue Peacock; Stanley F Smazal; Daniel D Maki; Thomas B Julian; Elizabeth R DePeri; David A Bluemke; Mitchell D Schnall
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-03-28       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  31 in total

1.  Mortality After Breast Cancer Among Survivors of Childhood Cancer: A Report From the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study.

Authors:  Chaya S Moskowitz; Joanne F Chou; Joseph P Neglia; Ann H Partridge; Rebecca M Howell; Lisa R Diller; Danielle Novetsky Friedman; Dana Barnea; Lindsay M Morton; Lucie M Turcotte; Michael A Arnold; Wendy M Leisenring; Gregory T Armstrong; Leslie L Robison; Kevin C Oeffinger; Tara O Henderson
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Five-year risk of interval-invasive second breast cancer.

Authors:  Janie M Lee; Diana S M Buist; Nehmat Houssami; Emily C Dowling; Elkan F Halpern; G Scott Gazelle; Constance D Lehman; Louise M Henderson; Rebecca A Hubbard
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 3.  A review of the influence of mammographic density on breast cancer clinical and pathological phenotype.

Authors:  Michael S Shawky; Cecilia W Huo; Kara Britt; Erik W Thompson; Michael A Henderson; Andrew Redfern
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2019-06-08       Impact factor: 4.872

4.  "When I Needed It": Evaluation of the Use and Timing of Sharsheret's Thriving Again Program for Young Breast Cancer Survivors.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Rohan; Julie S Townsend; Adina Fleischmann; Sharon Stahl; Rochelle Shoretz
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 2.037

5.  Long-term surveillance mammography and mortality in older women with a history of early stage invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  Diana S M Buist; Jaclyn L F Bosco; Rebecca A Silliman; Heather Taffet Gold; Terry Field; Marianne Ulcickas Yood; Virginia P Quinn; Marianne Prout; Timothy L Lash
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 4.872

6.  Factors associated with long-term adherence to annual surveillance mammography among breast cancer survivors.

Authors:  Heidi S Wirtz; Denise M Boudreau; Julie R Gralow; William E Barlow; Shelly Gray; Erin J A Bowles; Diana S M Buist
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2014-01-10       Impact factor: 4.872

7.  A joint model for multistate disease processes and random informative observation times, with applications to electronic medical records data.

Authors:  Jane M Lange; Rebecca A Hubbard; Lurdes Y T Inoue; Vladimir N Minin
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Accuracy and outcomes of screening mammography in women with a personal history of early-stage breast cancer.

Authors:  Nehmat Houssami; Linn A Abraham; Diana L Miglioretti; Edward A Sickles; Karla Kerlikowske; Diana S M Buist; Berta M Geller; Hyman B Muss; Les Irwig
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Breast Biopsy Intensity and Findings Following Breast Cancer Screening in Women With and Without a Personal History of Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Diana S M Buist; Linn Abraham; Christoph I Lee; Janie M Lee; Constance Lehman; Ellen S O'Meara; Natasha K Stout; Louise M Henderson; Deirdre Hill; Karen J Wernli; Jennifer S Haas; Anna N A Tosteson; Karla Kerlikowske; Tracy Onega
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 21.873

10.  Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy in the American College of Radiology Imaging Network 6667 trial: effect of breast MR imaging assessments and patient characteristics.

Authors:  Habib Rahbar; Lucy G Hanna; Constantine Gatsonis; Mary C Mahoney; Mitchell D Schnall; Wendy B DeMartini; Constance D Lehman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2014-06-16       Impact factor: 11.105

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.