J Ben-Ari1, E Zimlichman, N Adi, P Sorkine. 1. Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Dana Children's Hospital, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Centre, and Sackler School of Medicine, 6 Weizman St., Tel-Aviv 64239, Israel.
Abstract
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: To assess the accuracy of the EverOn™ piezoelectric sensor based contactless heart rate and respiration rate monitoring system. METHODS: Measurements of the EverOn™ and reference devices were performed in a sleep lab and an intensive care unit (ICU) setting. One minute measurements by both the reference device and the EverOn™ were averaged and compared. Accuracy was defined in accordance with industry criteria. RESULTS: Respiration rate (RR) accuracy in the 41 children and 16 adults evaluated in the sleep lab was 93.1% and 90.6% respectively, and heart rate (HR) accuracy was 94.4% and 91.5% respectively. For the 42 ICU patients RR accuracy was 82.0% and 75% (versus end-tidal CO(2) and manual respectively), while accuracy of HR was 94.0%. The EverOn™ was found to be superior to the impedance technique in measuring RR. CONCLUSIONS: The system described was found to be accurate in accordance with regulatory and industry criteria.
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: To assess the accuracy of the EverOn™ piezoelectric sensor based contactless heart rate and respiration rate monitoring system. METHODS: Measurements of the EverOn™ and reference devices were performed in a sleep lab and an intensive care unit (ICU) setting. One minute measurements by both the reference device and the EverOn™ were averaged and compared. Accuracy was defined in accordance with industry criteria. RESULTS: Respiration rate (RR) accuracy in the 41 children and 16 adults evaluated in the sleep lab was 93.1% and 90.6% respectively, and heart rate (HR) accuracy was 94.4% and 91.5% respectively. For the 42 ICU patients RR accuracy was 82.0% and 75% (versus end-tidal CO(2) and manual respectively), while accuracy of HR was 94.0%. The EverOn™ was found to be superior to the impedance technique in measuring RR. CONCLUSIONS: The system described was found to be accurate in accordance with regulatory and industry criteria.
Authors: Géraldine M Mang; Jérôme Nicod; Yann Emmenegger; Kevin D Donohue; Bruce F O'Hara; Paul Franken Journal: Sleep Date: 2014-08-01 Impact factor: 5.849
Authors: Travis J Moss; Matthew T Clark; James Forrest Calland; Kyle B Enfield; John D Voss; Douglas E Lake; J Randall Moorman Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-08-03 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Martine J M Breteler; Erik Huizinga; Kim van Loon; Luke P H Leenen; Daan A J Dohmen; Cor J Kalkman; Taco J Blokhuis Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2018-02-27 Impact factor: 2.692