OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to analyse magnetic resonance findings of intramuscular metastases (IM) in a relatively large series. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 2000 to January 2010, 28 patients (207 metastases) were retrospectively identified in the radiological database of the Martin-Luther-University. Several different scanning protocols were used depending on the localisation of IM. In 12 patients diffusion-weighted (DW) images were obtained with a multi-shot SE-EPI sequence. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps were also calculated. Furthermore, fusion images were manually generated between the DW and half-Fourier acquisition single-shot turbo spin echo (HASTE) images. RESULTS: On T2-weighted images, 97% of the recognised IM were hyperintense in comparison to unaffected musculature, and 3% were mixed iso- to hyperintense. On T1-weighted images most IM (91%) were homogeneously isointense in comparison to muscle tissue, whereas 4% were hypointense, and 5% lightly hyperintense. ADC maps were calculated for 91 metastases ranging from 0.99 to 4.00 mm(2)s(-1) (mean value 1.99 ± 0.66). ADC values of low (<1.5) signal intensity (SI) were identified in 26%, moderate SI (from 1.5 to 3.0) in 68%, and high SI (>3.0) in 6%. Of the IM that were investigated with contrast medium, 88.5% showed marked enhancement. It was homogeneous in 88% and heterogenous in 6%. Rim enhancement with central low attenuation was seen in 6%. There was no difference in enhancement characteristics with respect to ADC values or fusion patterns. Peritumoral enhancement was identified in 2.4%. CONCLUSION: Magnetic resonance features of muscle metastases are relatively typical and consist of round or oval intramuscular masses with well-defined margins, marked enhancement, low or moderate ADC values, and moderate to high signal intensity on fusion images.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to analyse magnetic resonance findings of intramuscular metastases (IM) in a relatively large series. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 2000 to January 2010, 28 patients (207 metastases) were retrospectively identified in the radiological database of the Martin-Luther-University. Several different scanning protocols were used depending on the localisation of IM. In 12 patients diffusion-weighted (DW) images were obtained with a multi-shot SE-EPI sequence. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps were also calculated. Furthermore, fusion images were manually generated between the DW and half-Fourier acquisition single-shot turbo spin echo (HASTE) images. RESULTS: On T2-weighted images, 97% of the recognised IM were hyperintense in comparison to unaffected musculature, and 3% were mixed iso- to hyperintense. On T1-weighted images most IM (91%) were homogeneously isointense in comparison to muscle tissue, whereas 4% were hypointense, and 5% lightly hyperintense. ADC maps were calculated for 91 metastases ranging from 0.99 to 4.00 mm(2)s(-1) (mean value 1.99 ± 0.66). ADC values of low (<1.5) signal intensity (SI) were identified in 26%, moderate SI (from 1.5 to 3.0) in 68%, and high SI (>3.0) in 6%. Of the IM that were investigated with contrast medium, 88.5% showed marked enhancement. It was homogeneous in 88% and heterogenous in 6%. Rim enhancement with central low attenuation was seen in 6%. There was no difference in enhancement characteristics with respect to ADC values or fusion patterns. Peritumoral enhancement was identified in 2.4%. CONCLUSION: Magnetic resonance features of muscle metastases are relatively typical and consist of round or oval intramuscular masses with well-defined margins, marked enhancement, low or moderate ADC values, and moderate to high signal intensity on fusion images.
Authors: S Hasegawa; Y Sakurai; H Imazu; T Matsubara; M Ochiai; T Funabiki; K Suzuki; Y Mizoguchi; M Kuroda; M Kasahara Journal: Surg Today Date: 2000 Impact factor: 2.549
Authors: Tamara Miner Haygood; Mohamed Sayyouh; Jason Wong; Jennifer C Lin; Aurelio Matamoros; Carl Sandler; John E Madewell Journal: Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J Date: 2015-08-24
Authors: Alexey Surov; Shuji Nagata; Ahmed A Abd Razek; Sree Harsha Tirumani; Andreas Wienke; Thomas Kahn Journal: Skeletal Radiol Date: 2015-04-28 Impact factor: 2.199
Authors: Fatima Soliman; Sinchun Hwang; Jonathan Landa; Robert A Lefkowitz; David M Panicek Journal: Clin Imaging Date: 2016-01-15 Impact factor: 1.605