BACKGROUND: Medicare Part D, introduced in January 2006, was intended to decrease beneficiaries' out-of-pocket expenditures on medications. METHODS: We examined whether this policy was successful in achieving this goal, including effects on Medicare beneficiaries without previous drug coverage and those who previously received coverage through Medicaid, in a longitudinal study of out-of-pocket expenditures on medications in 1504 Medicare beneficiaries 65 years and older participating in the 2005 and 2006 waves of the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. RESULTS: Mean annual out-of-pocket expenditures on medications decreased by 32% ($320; 95% confidence interval [CI], $250-$391), from $1011 to $691, in the year after Part D was implemented for all Medicare beneficiaries in the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. Mean annual out-of-pocket expenditures on medications decreased by 49% ($748; 95% CI, $600-$897), from $1533 to $784, in beneficiaries without previous drug coverage who enrolled in a Part D plan. Beneficiaries who did not enroll experienced a mean reduction of 32% ($353; 95% CI, $188-$518), from $1116 to $763. Mean annual out-of-pocket expenditures on medications remained similar in dual Medicare and Medicaid beneficiaries. CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of Medicare Part D was associated with reductions in Medicare beneficiaries' out-of-pocket expenditures on medications, particularly in beneficiaries without previous drug coverage, and did not substantially change expenditures for Medicare beneficiaries who previously received pharmacy coverage through Medicaid. However, a question remains about whether the high public cost of providing pharmacy coverage through Medicare is worth the substantially lower financial benefit derived by beneficiaries.
BACKGROUND: Medicare Part D, introduced in January 2006, was intended to decrease beneficiaries' out-of-pocket expenditures on medications. METHODS: We examined whether this policy was successful in achieving this goal, including effects on Medicare beneficiaries without previous drug coverage and those who previously received coverage through Medicaid, in a longitudinal study of out-of-pocket expenditures on medications in 1504 Medicare beneficiaries 65 years and older participating in the 2005 and 2006 waves of the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. RESULTS: Mean annual out-of-pocket expenditures on medications decreased by 32% ($320; 95% confidence interval [CI], $250-$391), from $1011 to $691, in the year after Part D was implemented for all Medicare beneficiaries in the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. Mean annual out-of-pocket expenditures on medications decreased by 49% ($748; 95% CI, $600-$897), from $1533 to $784, in beneficiaries without previous drug coverage who enrolled in a Part D plan. Beneficiaries who did not enroll experienced a mean reduction of 32% ($353; 95% CI, $188-$518), from $1116 to $763. Mean annual out-of-pocket expenditures on medications remained similar in dual Medicare and Medicaid beneficiaries. CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of Medicare Part D was associated with reductions in Medicare beneficiaries' out-of-pocket expenditures on medications, particularly in beneficiaries without previous drug coverage, and did not substantially change expenditures for Medicare beneficiaries who previously received pharmacy coverage through Medicaid. However, a question remains about whether the high public cost of providing pharmacy coverage through Medicare is worth the substantially lower financial benefit derived by beneficiaries.
Authors: Leslie R Harrold; Daniel Peterson; Ashley J Beard; Jerry H Gurwitz; Becky A Briesacher Journal: Am J Med Date: 2012-06-09 Impact factor: 4.965
Authors: Becky A Briesacher; Yanfang Zhao; Jeanne M Madden; Fang Zhang; Alyce S Adams; Jennifer Tjia; Dennis Ross-Degnan; Jerry H Gurwitz; Stephen B Soumerai Journal: Med Care Date: 2011-09 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Janice Blanchard; Jeanne M Madden; Dennis Ross-Degnan; Carol Roan Gresenz; Stephen B Soumerai Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 2013-05-28 Impact factor: 5.721
Authors: Shirley Musich; Yan Cheng; Shaohung S Wang; Cynthia E Hommer; Kevin Hawkins; Charlotte S Yeh Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2015-02-10 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Andrew R H Dalton; Eszter P Vamos; Matthew J Harris; Gopalakrishnan Netuveli; Robert M Wachter; Azeem Majeed; Christopher Millett Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-01-08 Impact factor: 3.240