BACKGROUND: The health care systems in many countries are focused on specialist care. In those countries that have recently changed to a primary care-based system, some doctors and patients were dissatisfied with the change. OBJECTIVE: To explore the opinions of the general public and the doctors on the change to a family medicine (FM)-based health care system. METHODS: Qualitative study with focus groups of doctors working in different practice settings. Quantitative study with questionnaires sent to all doctors registered in Hong Kong and a telephone survey targeting the general public aged ≥18. RESULTS: Doctors in the focus groups generally supported a FM-based health care system. They were concerned that there were not enough family doctors for such a system and the patients' current free choice of any doctor for primary care would impede its success. Thousand six hundred and forty-seven adults took part in the telephone survey (response rate 67.6%) and 2310 doctors (22.8%) responded to the questionnaire. Nearly 95% of the general public respondents agreed to the FM system though only 66.3% of them had ever heard of the term family doctor. About 65% of the doctors supported this system but only 33% agreed that the system would work. The specialist-doctors were less supportive of mandatory referral than the non-specialists, while the public was equally divided on this issue. CONCLUSIONS: The public accepts the FM-based system but needs education on the benefits of primary health care. Direct access to the specialist would be the greatest barrier. Government involvements are essential for the reform.
BACKGROUND: The health care systems in many countries are focused on specialist care. In those countries that have recently changed to a primary care-based system, some doctors and patients were dissatisfied with the change. OBJECTIVE: To explore the opinions of the general public and the doctors on the change to a family medicine (FM)-based health care system. METHODS: Qualitative study with focus groups of doctors working in different practice settings. Quantitative study with questionnaires sent to all doctors registered in Hong Kong and a telephone survey targeting the general public aged ≥18. RESULTS: Doctors in the focus groups generally supported a FM-based health care system. They were concerned that there were not enough family doctors for such a system and the patients' current free choice of any doctor for primary care would impede its success. Thousand six hundred and forty-seven adults took part in the telephone survey (response rate 67.6%) and 2310 doctors (22.8%) responded to the questionnaire. Nearly 95% of the general public respondents agreed to the FM system though only 66.3% of them had ever heard of the term family doctor. About 65% of the doctors supported this system but only 33% agreed that the system would work. The specialist-doctors were less supportive of mandatory referral than the non-specialists, while the public was equally divided on this issue. CONCLUSIONS: The public accepts the FM-based system but needs education on the benefits of primary health care. Direct access to the specialist would be the greatest barrier. Government involvements are essential for the reform.
Authors: Kai Sing Sun; Tai Pong Lam; Kwok Fai Lam; Leon Piterman; Tak Lam Lo; David Vai Kiong Chao; Edmund Wing Wo Lam Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-10-02 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Tai Pong Lam; Hoi Yan Chan; Leon Piterman; Mei Wa Wong; Kai Sing Sun; Kwok Fai Lam; Tak Hon Chan; Wu Dan; Agnes Tiwari Journal: BMC Fam Pract Date: 2020-07-30 Impact factor: 2.497