Literature DB >> 20695693

The short of it: abbreviating the temporal discounting procedure.

Richard Yi1, Jeffrey A Pitcock, Reid D Landes, Warren K Bickel.   

Abstract

A typical temporal discounting procedure determines the present, subjective value (indifference point) of a delayed outcome at 5 to 8 different delays to that outcome. These indifference points are used to determine a single index of discounting called a discounting rate. One concern that remains in the collection of this data is the high number of trials or choices, resulting in participant fatigue or other factors that may affect the validity of the data. In this report, we propose an abbreviated alternative to the more comprehensive and time-consuming discounting procedure. Specifically, we propose that fewer indifference points can be used to determine statistically equivalent discount rates with no loss in data sensitivity. We reanalyzed temporal discounting data obtained with 7 indifference points, and estimated discount rates from all combinations of 2, 3, and 4 of the 7 indifference points. Results indicate that valid and sensitive discounting indices can be obtained with fewer indifference points, and the most appropriate sets of indifference points are highlighted. The proposed abbreviated procedure is likely to be particularly useful when time constraints or participant fatigue is a concern as well as in repeated-measures contexts. PsycINFO Database Record 2010 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20695693      PMCID: PMC4004783          DOI: 10.1037/a0019904

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol        ISSN: 1064-1297            Impact factor:   3.157


  41 in total

1.  Comparison between two measures of delay discounting in smokers.

Authors:  Leonard H Epstein; Jerry B Richards; Frances G Saad; Rocco A Paluch; James N Roemmich; Caryn Lerman
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.157

2.  Symmetrical confidence intervals for bioequivalence trials.

Authors:  W J Westlake
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1976-12       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Effects of short-term nicotine deprivation on decision-making: delay, uncertainty and effort discounting.

Authors:  Suzanne H Mitchell
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.244

4.  Relationship between cooperation in an iterated prisoner's dilemma game and the discounting of hypothetical outcomes.

Authors:  Richard Yi; Matthew W Johnson; Warren K Bickel
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 1.986

Review 5.  Bioequivalence approaches for highly variable drugs and drug products.

Authors:  Sam H Haidar; Barbara Davit; Mei-Ling Chen; Dale Conner; LaiMing Lee; Qian H Li; Robert Lionberger; Fairouz Makhlouf; Devvrat Patel; Donald J Schuirmann; Lawrence X Yu
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2007-09-22       Impact factor: 4.200

6.  Sample sizes for bioequivalence studies.

Authors:  C M Metzler
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Adolescents' performance on delay and probability discounting tasks: contributions of age, intelligence, executive functioning, and self-reported externalizing behavior.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Olson; Catalina J Hooper; Paul Collins; Monica Luciana
Journal:  Pers Individ Dif       Date:  2007-11

8.  Do pretty women inspire men to discount the future?

Authors:  Margo Wilson; Martin Daly
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-05-07       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Delay and probability discounting as related to different stages of adolescent smoking and non-smoking.

Authors:  Brady Reynolds; Katherine Karraker; Kimberly Horn; Jerry B. Richards
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2003-10-31       Impact factor: 1.777

Review 10.  A unified framework for addiction: vulnerabilities in the decision process.

Authors:  A David Redish; Steve Jensen; Adam Johnson
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 21.357

View more
  6 in total

1.  Restricted psychological horizon in active methamphetamine users: future, past, probability, and social discounting.

Authors:  Richard Yi; Anne E Carter; Reid D Landes
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 2.293

2.  Exchanging the liquidity hypothesis: Delay discounting of money and self-relevant non-money rewards.

Authors:  Allison M Stuppy-Sullivan; Kayla N Tormohlen; Richard Yi
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2015-11-07       Impact factor: 1.777

3.  Individual differences in functional brain connectivity predict temporal discounting preference in the transition to adolescence.

Authors:  Jeya Anandakumar; Kathryn L Mills; Eric A Earl; Lourdes Irwin; Oscar Miranda-Dominguez; Damion V Demeter; Alexandra Walton-Weston; Sarah Karalunas; Joel Nigg; Damien A Fair
Journal:  Dev Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2018-07-30       Impact factor: 6.464

4.  The Effects of Citalopram and Thalamic Dopamine D2/3 Receptor Availability on Decision-Making and Loss Aversion in Alcohol Dependence.

Authors:  Todd Zorick; Kyoji Okita; K Brooke Renard; Mark A Mandelkern; Arthur L Brody; Edythe D London
Journal:  Psychiatry J       Date:  2022-09-20

5.  The impact of threat of shock on the framing effect and temporal discounting: executive functions unperturbed by acute stress?

Authors:  Oliver J Robinson; Rebecca L Bond; Jonathan P Roiser
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-08-31

6.  Caudate responses to reward anticipation associated with delay discounting behavior in healthy youth.

Authors:  Margaret M Benningfield; Jennifer U Blackford; Melissa E Ellsworth; Gregory R Samanez-Larkin; Peter R Martin; Ronald L Cowan; David H Zald
Journal:  Dev Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 6.464

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.