INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to compare referral and treatment rates of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer before and after publication of a clinical practice guideline. METHODS: This was a retrospective comparative cohort study of 236 patients diagnosed with clinical stage >/= T2 bladder cancer in Alberta, Canada. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on the time of diagnosis relative to the publication of the Alberta Genitourinary Oncology Group Clinical Practice Guideline on Bladder Cancer (CPG), which recommends cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy for muscle-invasive disease. The pre-CPG group included patients (n = 129) diagnosed prior to publication of the CPG (November 1, 2002 to October 31, 2004, inclusively). The post-CPG group included patients (n = 107) diagnosed after publication of the CPG (November 1, 2005 to October 31, 2007). There was an accrual blackout period of 6 months before and after the CPG release date. The primary analysis compared the two groups with respect to neoadjuvant chemotherapy referral rates, treatment-offered rates and treatment-administered rates. RESULTS: Referral to medical oncology regarding neoadjuvant chemotherapy occurred in 2.3% and 23.4% of patients in the pre- and post-CPG groups, respectively (p < 0.01). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was offered to 0.8% and 18.7% of patients in the pre- and post-CPG groups, respectively (p < 0.01). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was administered to 0.8% and 14.0% of patients in the pre- and post-CPG groups, respectively (p < 0.01). INTERPRETATION: Neoadjuvant referral and treatment rates increased after publication of the CPG. However, overall referral and treatment rates remained low, which warrants additional exploration.
INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to compare referral and treatment rates of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer before and after publication of a clinical practice guideline. METHODS: This was a retrospective comparative cohort study of 236 patients diagnosed with clinical stage >/= T2 bladder cancer in Alberta, Canada. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on the time of diagnosis relative to the publication of the Alberta Genitourinary Oncology Group Clinical Practice Guideline on Bladder Cancer (CPG), which recommends cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy for muscle-invasive disease. The pre-CPG group included patients (n = 129) diagnosed prior to publication of the CPG (November 1, 2002 to October 31, 2004, inclusively). The post-CPG group included patients (n = 107) diagnosed after publication of the CPG (November 1, 2005 to October 31, 2007). There was an accrual blackout period of 6 months before and after the CPG release date. The primary analysis compared the two groups with respect to neoadjuvant chemotherapy referral rates, treatment-offered rates and treatment-administered rates. RESULTS: Referral to medical oncology regarding neoadjuvant chemotherapy occurred in 2.3% and 23.4% of patients in the pre- and post-CPG groups, respectively (p < 0.01). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was offered to 0.8% and 18.7% of patients in the pre- and post-CPG groups, respectively (p < 0.01). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was administered to 0.8% and 14.0% of patients in the pre- and post-CPG groups, respectively (p < 0.01). INTERPRETATION: Neoadjuvant referral and treatment rates increased after publication of the CPG. However, overall referral and treatment rates remained low, which warrants additional exploration.
Authors: Adrian Fairey; Michael Chetner; James Metcalfe; Ronald Moore; Gerald Todd; Keith Rourke; Don Voaklander; Eric Estey Journal: J Urol Date: 2008-05-15 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: H von der Maase; S W Hansen; J T Roberts; L Dogliotti; T Oliver; M J Moore; I Bodrogi; P Albers; A Knuth; C M Lippert; P Kerbrat; P Sanchez Rovira; P Wersall; S P Cleall; D F Roychowdhury; I Tomlin; C M Visseren-Grul; P F Conte Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2000-09 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Hans von der Maase; Lisa Sengelov; James T Roberts; Sergio Ricci; Luigi Dogliotti; T Oliver; Malcolm J Moore; Annamaria Zimmermann; Michael Arning Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2005-07-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Atreya Dash; Joseph A Pettus; Harry W Herr; Bernard H Bochner; Guido Dalbagni; S Machele Donat; Paul Russo; Mary G Boyle; Matthew I Milowsky; Dean F Bajorin Journal: Cancer Date: 2008-11-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: T A Splinter; H I Scher; L Denis; R Bukowski; S Simon; I Klimberg; M Soloway; N J Vogelzang; H van Tinteren; H Herr Journal: J Urol Date: 1992-03 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: H Barton Grossman; Ronald B Natale; Catherine M Tangen; V O Speights; Nicholas J Vogelzang; Donald L Trump; Ralph W deVere White; Michael F Sarosdy; David P Wood; Derek Raghavan; E David Crawford Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2003-08-28 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Jonathan J Duplisea; Ross J Mason; Chad A Reichard; Roger Li; Yu Shen; Stephen A Boorjian; Colin P Dinney Journal: Can Urol Assoc J Date: 2018-07-31 Impact factor: 1.862
Authors: Ruth L Vinall; Alexandra Z Ripoll; Sisi Wang; Chong-Xian Pan; Ralph W deVere White Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2011-12-02 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Tina Hsu; Peter C Black; Kim N Chi; Christina M Canil; Bernhard J Eigl; Girish Kulkarni; Scott North; Lori Wood; Alexandre R Zlotta; Anthea Lau; Tony Panzarella; Srikala S Sridhar Journal: Can Urol Assoc J Date: 2014-09 Impact factor: 1.862