Literature DB >> 20694104

Referral and treatment rates of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in muscle-invasive bladder cancer before and after publication of a clinical practice guideline.

Brendan J W Miles1, Adrian S Fairey, Michael Eliasziw, Eric P Estey, Peter Venner, Daygen Finch, Kiril Trpkov, Bernhard J Eigl.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to compare referral and treatment rates of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer before and after publication of a clinical practice guideline.
METHODS: This was a retrospective comparative cohort study of 236 patients diagnosed with clinical stage >/= T2 bladder cancer in Alberta, Canada. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on the time of diagnosis relative to the publication of the Alberta Genitourinary Oncology Group Clinical Practice Guideline on Bladder Cancer (CPG), which recommends cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy for muscle-invasive disease. The pre-CPG group included patients (n = 129) diagnosed prior to publication of the CPG (November 1, 2002 to October 31, 2004, inclusively). The post-CPG group included patients (n = 107) diagnosed after publication of the CPG (November 1, 2005 to October 31, 2007). There was an accrual blackout period of 6 months before and after the CPG release date. The primary analysis compared the two groups with respect to neoadjuvant chemotherapy referral rates, treatment-offered rates and treatment-administered rates.
RESULTS: Referral to medical oncology regarding neoadjuvant chemotherapy occurred in 2.3% and 23.4% of patients in the pre- and post-CPG groups, respectively (p < 0.01). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was offered to 0.8% and 18.7% of patients in the pre- and post-CPG groups, respectively (p < 0.01). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was administered to 0.8% and 14.0% of patients in the pre- and post-CPG groups, respectively (p < 0.01).
INTERPRETATION: Neoadjuvant referral and treatment rates increased after publication of the CPG. However, overall referral and treatment rates remained low, which warrants additional exploration.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 20694104      PMCID: PMC2910772          DOI: 10.5489/cuaj09134

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J        ISSN: 1911-6470            Impact factor:   1.862


  10 in total

Review 1.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Eric Winquist; Tricia S Kirchner; Roanne Segal; Joseph Chin; Himu Lukka
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Associations among age, comorbidity and clinical outcomes after radical cystectomy: results from the Alberta Urology Institute radical cystectomy database.

Authors:  Adrian Fairey; Michael Chetner; James Metcalfe; Ronald Moore; Gerald Todd; Keith Rourke; Don Voaklander; Eric Estey
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-05-15       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Prognostic factors of outcome after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: a retrospective study of a homogeneous patient cohort.

Authors:  P Bassi; G D Ferrante; N Piazza; R Spinadin; R Carando; G Pappagallo; F Pagano
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Gemcitabine and cisplatin versus methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin in advanced or metastatic bladder cancer: results of a large, randomized, multinational, multicenter, phase III study.

Authors:  H von der Maase; S W Hansen; J T Roberts; L Dogliotti; T Oliver; M J Moore; I Bodrogi; P Albers; A Knuth; C M Lippert; P Kerbrat; P Sanchez Rovira; P Wersall; S P Cleall; D F Roychowdhury; I Tomlin; C M Visseren-Grul; P F Conte
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Long-term survival results of a randomized trial comparing gemcitabine plus cisplatin, with methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, plus cisplatin in patients with bladder cancer.

Authors:  Hans von der Maase; Lisa Sengelov; James T Roberts; Sergio Ricci; Luigi Dogliotti; T Oliver; Malcolm J Moore; Annamaria Zimmermann; Michael Arning
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-07-20       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  A role for neoadjuvant gemcitabine plus cisplatin in muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder: a retrospective experience.

Authors:  Atreya Dash; Joseph A Pettus; Harry W Herr; Bernard H Bochner; Guido Dalbagni; S Machele Donat; Paul Russo; Mary G Boyle; Matthew I Milowsky; Dean F Bajorin
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-11-01       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  The prognostic value of the pathological response to combination chemotherapy before cystectomy in patients with invasive bladder cancer. European Organization for Research on Treatment of Cancer--Genitourinary Group.

Authors:  T A Splinter; H I Scher; L Denis; R Bukowski; S Simon; I Klimberg; M Soloway; N J Vogelzang; H van Tinteren; H Herr
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus cystectomy compared with cystectomy alone for locally advanced bladder cancer.

Authors:  H Barton Grossman; Ronald B Natale; Catherine M Tangen; V O Speights; Nicholas J Vogelzang; Donald L Trump; Ralph W deVere White; Michael F Sarosdy; David P Wood; Derek Raghavan; E David Crawford
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-08-28       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Low incidence of perioperative chemotherapy for stage III bladder cancer 1998 to 2003: a report from the National Cancer Data Base.

Authors:  Kevin A David; Matthew I Milowsky; Jamie Ritchey; Peter R Carroll; David M Nanus
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-06-11       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 10.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in invasive bladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2003-06-07       Impact factor: 79.321

  10 in total
  16 in total

1.  MRI and prostate cancer: the next frontier.

Authors: 
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Using clinical practice guidelines in our own backyard: treating our patients with bladder cancer.

Authors:  Peter Black
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 3.  Neoadjuvant paradigm for accelerated drug development: an ideal model in bladder cancer.

Authors:  David D Chism; Michael E Woods; Matthew I Milowsky
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2013-07-24

4.  Predictors of referral for neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to radical cystectomy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer and changes in practice over time.

Authors:  Geoffrey T Gotto; Melissa A Shea-Budgell; M Sarah Rose; J Dean Ruether
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 5.  Multimodal therapies for muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder.

Authors:  Kirk A Keegan; Matthew J Resnick; Peter E Clark
Journal:  Curr Opin Oncol       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 3.645

6.  Invasive bladder cancer: ignoring the data.

Authors:  Derek Raghavan
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2013

7.  The Canadian Bladder Cancer Network: efforts to improve patient care.

Authors:  Peter Black
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 1.862

8.  Trends and disparities in the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Jonathan J Duplisea; Ross J Mason; Chad A Reichard; Roger Li; Yu Shen; Stephen A Boorjian; Colin P Dinney
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 1.862

9.  MiR-34a chemosensitizes bladder cancer cells to cisplatin treatment regardless of p53-Rb pathway status.

Authors:  Ruth L Vinall; Alexandra Z Ripoll; Sisi Wang; Chong-Xian Pan; Ralph W deVere White
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 7.396

10.  Treatment of muscle-invasive bladder cancer in Canada: A survey of genitourinary medical oncologists and urologists.

Authors:  Tina Hsu; Peter C Black; Kim N Chi; Christina M Canil; Bernhard J Eigl; Girish Kulkarni; Scott North; Lori Wood; Alexandre R Zlotta; Anthea Lau; Tony Panzarella; Srikala S Sridhar
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.862

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.