Literature DB >> 17561135

Low incidence of perioperative chemotherapy for stage III bladder cancer 1998 to 2003: a report from the National Cancer Data Base.

Kevin A David1, Matthew I Milowsky, Jamie Ritchey, Peter R Carroll, David M Nanus.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Studies of perioperative chemotherapy for muscle invasive bladder cancer have shown a survival benefit with combined modality therapy. We reviewed chemotherapy use in patients with stage III transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder from 1998 to 2003 to evaluate perioperative chemotherapy treatment patterns.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The National Cancer Data Base collected data on approximately 60% of all newly diagnosed bladder cancer cases in the United States from 1998 to 2003. We queried the National Cancer Data Base for all treatment of male and female patients 18 years old or older with bladder transitional cell carcinoma diagnosed between 1998 and 2003. A total of 224,060 bladder transitional cell carcinoma records were reviewed. Perioperative chemotherapy was defined as chemotherapy given within 4 months before and 4 months after surgery. Of 11,339 cases of stage III bladder cancer treatment, analysis was possible for 7,161.
RESULTS: Treatment patterns were analyzed in 7,161 patients with stage III bladder transitional cell carcinoma. Perioperative chemotherapy was administered to 11.6% of patients with stage III bladder transitional cell carcinoma with 10.4% receiving adjuvant chemotherapy and 1.2% receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. When comparing perioperative chemotherapy use by diagnosis year in 1998 and 2003, a small statistically significant increase was observed using the Pearson's chi-square test with Bonferroni correction (p <0.05) at 11.3% of patients in 1998 vs 16.8% in 2003.
CONCLUSIONS: Perioperative chemotherapy is underused in the management of surgically resectable stage III transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder. This finding may reflect a delay in implementing the results of recently reported randomized trials, a low incidence of referrals by urologists for chemotherapy and/or confidence in salvage chemotherapy as an equivalent alternative. Further followup will determine if this treatment pattern changes in the future.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17561135     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.03.101

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  62 in total

Review 1.  Neoadjuvant paradigm for accelerated drug development: an ideal model in bladder cancer.

Authors:  David D Chism; Michael E Woods; Matthew I Milowsky
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2013-07-24

Review 2.  Muscle-invasive urothelial bladder cancer: an update on systemic therapy.

Authors:  Hayley Knollman; J Luke Godwin; Rishi Jain; Yu-Ning Wong; Elizabeth R Plimack; Daniel M Geynisman
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2015-12

Review 3.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  Guru Sonpavde; Cora N Sternberg
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 3.092

4.  Invasive bladder cancer: ignoring the data.

Authors:  Derek Raghavan
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2013

5.  Chemotherapy: Standardizing the care of invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  Bernard H Bochner
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 6.  Increasing utilization of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer in the United States.

Authors:  Kirk A Keegan; Harras B Zaid; Sanjay G Patel; Sam S Chang
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 3.092

7.  Overall survival in patients with residual disease after radical cystectomy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Izak Faiena; Amirali Salmasi; Neil Mendhiratta; Andrew T Lenis; Aydin Pooli; Alexandra Drakaki; Kiran Gollapudi; Jeremy Blumberg; Allan J Pantuck; Karim Chamie
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-05-11       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  Association of hospital volume with conditional 90-day mortality after cystectomy: an analysis of the National Cancer Data Base.

Authors:  Matthew E Nielsen; Katherine Mallin; Mark A Weaver; Bryan Palis; Andrew Stewart; David P Winchester; Matthew I Milowsky
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 5.588

9.  Somatic ERCC2 mutations correlate with cisplatin sensitivity in muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Eliezer M Van Allen; Kent W Mouw; Philip Kim; Gopa Iyer; Nikhil Wagle; Hikmat Al-Ahmadie; Cong Zhu; Irina Ostrovnaya; Gregory V Kryukov; Kevin W O'Connor; John Sfakianos; Ilana Garcia-Grossman; Jaegil Kim; Elizabeth A Guancial; Richard Bambury; Samira Bahl; Namrata Gupta; Deborah Farlow; Angela Qu; Sabina Signoretti; Justine A Barletta; Victor Reuter; Jesse Boehm; Michael Lawrence; Gad Getz; Philip Kantoff; Bernard H Bochner; Toni K Choueiri; Dean F Bajorin; David B Solit; Stacey Gabriel; Alan D'Andrea; Levi A Garraway; Jonathan E Rosenberg
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 39.397

10.  A role for neoadjuvant gemcitabine plus cisplatin in muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder: a retrospective experience.

Authors:  Atreya Dash; Joseph A Pettus; Harry W Herr; Bernard H Bochner; Guido Dalbagni; S Machele Donat; Paul Russo; Mary G Boyle; Matthew I Milowsky; Dean F Bajorin
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-11-01       Impact factor: 6.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.