Literature DB >> 35416680

Litter Commensal Bacteria Can Limit the Horizontal Gene Transfer of Antimicrobial Resistance to Salmonella in Chickens.

Adelumola Oladeinde1, Zaid Abdo2, Benjamin Zwirzitz3, Reed Woyda2, Steven M Lakin2, Maximilian O Press4, Nelson A Cox1, Jesse C Thomas5, Torey Looft6, Michael J Rothrock1, Gregory Zock7, Jodie Plumblee Lawrence1, Denice Cudnik1, Casey Ritz7, Samuel E Aggrey7, Ivan Liachko4, Jonas R Grove4, Crystal Wiersma2.   

Abstract

Fostering a "balanced" gut microbiome through the administration of beneficial microbes that can competitively exclude pathogens has gained a lot of attention and use in human and animal medicine. However, little is known about how microbes affect the horizontal gene transfer of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). To shed more light on this question, we challenged neonatal broiler chicks raised on reused broiler chicken litter-a complex environment made up of decomposing pine shavings, feces, uric acid, feathers, and feed-with Salmonella enterica serovar Heidelberg (S. Heidelberg), a model pathogen. Neonatal chicks challenged with S. Heidelberg and raised on reused litter were more resistant to S. Heidelberg cecal colonization than chicks grown on fresh litter. Furthermore, chicks grown on reused litter were at a lower risk of colonization with S. Heidelberg strains that encoded AMR on IncI1 plasmids. We used 16S rRNA gene sequencing and shotgun metagenomics to show that the major difference between chicks grown on fresh litter and those grown on reused litter was the microbiome harbored in the litter and ceca. The microbiome of reused litter samples was more uniform and enriched in functional pathways related to the biosynthesis of organic and antimicrobial molecules than that in fresh litter samples. We found that Escherichia coli was the main reservoir of plasmids encoding AMR and that the IncI1 plasmid was maintained at a significantly lower copy per cell in reused litter compared to fresh litter. These findings support the notion that commensal bacteria play an integral role in the horizontal transfer of plasmids encoding AMR to pathogens like Salmonella. IMPORTANCE Antimicrobial resistance spread is a worldwide health challenge, stemming in large part from the ability of microorganisms to share their genetic material through horizontal gene transfer. To address this issue, many countries and international organizations have adopted a One Health approach to curtail the proliferation of antimicrobial-resistant bacteria. This includes the removal and reduction of antibiotics used in food animal production and the development of alternatives to antibiotics. However, there is still a significant knowledge gap in our understanding of how resistance spreads in the absence of antibiotic selection and the role commensal bacteria play in reducing antibiotic resistance transfer. In this study, we show that commensal bacteria play a key role in reducing the horizontal gene transfer of antibiotic resistance to Salmonella, provide the identity of the bacterial species that potentially perform this function in broiler chickens, and also postulate the mechanism involved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AMR; HGT; Salmonella; broiler chickens; commensal bacteria

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35416680      PMCID: PMC9107613          DOI: 10.1128/aem.02517-21

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   5.005


  50 in total

1.  The effect of a commercial competitive exclusion product on the selection of enrofloxacin resistance in commensal E. coli in broilers.

Authors:  Ilias Chantziaras; Annemieke Smet; Maria Eleni Filippitzi; Bert Damiaans; Freddy Haesebrouck; Filip Boyen; Jeroen Dewulf
Journal:  Avian Pathol       Date:  2018-07-09       Impact factor: 3.378

2.  Competitive Exclusion Reduces Transmission and Excretion of Extended-Spectrum-β-Lactamase-Producing Escherichia coli in Broilers.

Authors:  Daniela Ceccarelli; Alieda van Essen-Zandbergen; Bregtje Smid; Kees T Veldman; Gert Jan Boender; Egil A J Fischer; Dik J Mevius; Jeanet A van der Goot
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes.

Authors:  Donovan H Parks; Michael Imelfort; Connor T Skennerton; Philip Hugenholtz; Gene W Tyson
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 4.  Dissemination of Antimicrobial Resistance in Microbial Ecosystems through Horizontal Gene Transfer.

Authors:  Christian J H von Wintersdorff; John Penders; Julius M van Niekerk; Nathan D Mills; Snehali Majumder; Lieke B van Alphen; Paul H M Savelkoul; Petra F G Wolffs
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-02-19       Impact factor: 5.640

5.  Early-life gut microbiome modulation reduces the abundance of antibiotic-resistant bacteria.

Authors:  Jennifer T Smilowitz; Mark A Underwood; Giorgio Casaburi; Rebbeca M Duar; Daniel P Vance; Ryan Mitchell; Lindsey Contreras; Steven A Frese
Journal:  Antimicrob Resist Infect Control       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 4.887

6.  Resident microbial communities inhibit growth and antibiotic-resistance evolution of Escherichia coli in human gut microbiome samples.

Authors:  Michael Baumgartner; Florian Bayer; Katia R Pfrunder-Cardozo; Angus Buckling; Alex R Hall
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 8.029

7.  Efficacy of a competitive exclusion culture against extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli strains in broilers using a seeder bird model.

Authors:  Ulrich Methner; Uwe Rösler
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 2.741

8.  Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform.

Authors:  Heng Li; Richard Durbin
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-05-18       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 9.  Bifidobacteria and Their Role as Members of the Human Gut Microbiota.

Authors:  Amy O'Callaghan; Douwe van Sinderen
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 5.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.