CONTEXT: Although pain ranks highly among reasons for seeking care, routine pain assessment is often inaccurate. OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated factors associated with nurses (e.g., registered) and other nursing support staff (e.g., licensed vocational nurses and health technicians) discordance with patients in estimates of pain in a health system where routine pain screening using a 0-10 numeric rating scale (NRS) is mandated. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional, visit-based, cohort study that included surveys of clinic outpatients (n=465) and nursing staff (n=94) who screened for pain as part of routine vital sign measurement during intake. These data were supplemented by chart review. We compared patient pain levels documented by the nursing staff (N-NRS) with those reported by the patient during the study survey (S-NRS). RESULTS: Pain underestimation (N-NRS<S-NRS) occurred in 25% and overestimation (N-NRS>S-NRS) in 7% of the cases. Nursing staff used informal pain-screening techniques that did not follow established NRS protocols in half of the encounters. Pain underestimation was positively associated with more years of nursing staff work experience and patient anxiety or post-traumatic stress disorder and negatively associated with better patient-reported health status. Pain overestimation was positively associated with nursing staff's use of the full NRS protocol and with a distracting environment in which patient vitals were taken. CONCLUSION: Despite a long-standing mandate, pain-screening implementation falls short, and informal screening is common. Published by Elsevier Inc.
CONTEXT: Although pain ranks highly among reasons for seeking care, routine pain assessment is often inaccurate. OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated factors associated with nurses (e.g., registered) and other nursing support staff (e.g., licensed vocational nurses and health technicians) discordance with patients in estimates of pain in a health system where routine pain screening using a 0-10 numeric rating scale (NRS) is mandated. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional, visit-based, cohort study that included surveys of clinic outpatients (n=465) and nursing staff (n=94) who screened for pain as part of routine vital sign measurement during intake. These data were supplemented by chart review. We compared patientpain levels documented by the nursing staff (N-NRS) with those reported by the patient during the study survey (S-NRS). RESULTS:Pain underestimation (N-NRS<S-NRS) occurred in 25% and overestimation (N-NRS>S-NRS) in 7% of the cases. Nursing staff used informal pain-screening techniques that did not follow established NRS protocols in half of the encounters. Pain underestimation was positively associated with more years of nursing staff work experience and patientanxiety or post-traumatic stress disorder and negatively associated with better patient-reported health status. Pain overestimation was positively associated with nursing staff's use of the full NRS protocol and with a distracting environment in which patient vitals were taken. CONCLUSION: Despite a long-standing mandate, pain-screening implementation falls short, and informal screening is common. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Authors: Steven K Dobscha; Benjamin J Morasco; Anne E Kovas; Dawn M Peters; Kyle Hart; Bentson H McFarland Journal: Pain Med Date: 2014-12-28 Impact factor: 3.750
Authors: Anniek D Masman; Monique van Dijk; Joost van Rosmalen; Frans P M Baar; Dick Tibboel; Anneke A Boerlage Journal: BMC Palliat Care Date: 2018-02-21 Impact factor: 3.234
Authors: Angela Iula; Carola Ialungo; Chiara de Waure; Matteo Raponi; Matteo Burgazzoli; Maurizio Zega; Caterina Galletti; Gianfranco Damiani Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-05-07 Impact factor: 3.390