Steven K Dobscha1,2, Benjamin J Morasco1,2, Anne E Kovas1, Dawn M Peters3, Kyle Hart1, Bentson H McFarland2,3. 1. Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care, Portland Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Portland, Oregon, USA. 2. Department of Psychiatry, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA. 3. Department of Public Health & Preventive Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) uses the 11-point pain numeric rating scale (NRS) to gather pain intensity information from veterans at outpatient appointments. Yet, little is known about how NRS scores may vary over time within individuals; NRS variability may have important ramifications for treatment planning. Our main objective was to describe variability in NRS scores within a 1-month timeframe, as obtained during routine outpatient care in older patients with chronic pain treated in VA hospitals. A secondary objective was to explore for patient characteristics associated with within-month NRS score variability. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SUBJECTS: National sample of veterans 65 years or older seen in VA in 2010 who had multiple elevated NRS scores indicating chronic pain. METHODS: VA datasets were used to identify the sample and demographic and clinical variables including NRS scores. For the main analysis, we identified subjects with two or more NRS scores obtained in each of two or more months in a 12-month period; we examined ranges in NRS scores across the first two qualifying months. RESULTS: Among 4,336 individuals in the main analysis cohort, the mean and median of the average NRS score range across the 2 months were 2.7 and 2.5, respectively. In multivariable models, main significant predictors of within-month NRS score variability were baseline pain intensity, overall medical comorbidity, and being divorced/separated. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of patients in the sample had clinically meaningful variation in pain scores within a given month. This finding highlights the need for clinicians and their patients to consider multiple NRS scores when making chronic pain treatment decisions. Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
OBJECTIVE: The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) uses the 11-point pain numeric rating scale (NRS) to gather pain intensity information from veterans at outpatient appointments. Yet, little is known about how NRS scores may vary over time within individuals; NRS variability may have important ramifications for treatment planning. Our main objective was to describe variability in NRS scores within a 1-month timeframe, as obtained during routine outpatient care in older patients with chronic pain treated in VA hospitals. A secondary objective was to explore for patient characteristics associated with within-month NRS score variability. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SUBJECTS: National sample of veterans 65 years or older seen in VA in 2010 who had multiple elevated NRS scores indicating chronic pain. METHODS: VA datasets were used to identify the sample and demographic and clinical variables including NRS scores. For the main analysis, we identified subjects with two or more NRS scores obtained in each of two or more months in a 12-month period; we examined ranges in NRS scores across the first two qualifying months. RESULTS: Among 4,336 individuals in the main analysis cohort, the mean and median of the average NRS score range across the 2 months were 2.7 and 2.5, respectively. In multivariable models, main significant predictors of within-month NRS score variability were baseline pain intensity, overall medical comorbidity, and being divorced/separated. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of patients in the sample had clinically meaningful variation in pain scores within a given month. This finding highlights the need for clinicians and their patients to consider multiple NRS scores when making chronic pain treatment decisions. Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Authors: Richard E Harris; David A Williams; Samuel A McLean; Ananda Sen; Michael Hufford; R Michael Gendreau; Richard H Gracely; Daniel J Clauw Journal: Arthritis Rheum Date: 2005-11
Authors: Michael Von Korff; Paul Crane; Michael Lane; Diana L Miglioretti; Greg Simon; Kathleen Saunders; Paul Stang; Nancy Brandenburg; Ronald Kessler Journal: Pain Date: 2005-02 Impact factor: 6.961
Authors: L E Kazis; D R Miller; J Clark; K Skinner; A Lee; W Rogers; A Spiro; S Payne; G Fincke; A Selim; M Linzer Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 1998-03-23
Authors: Steven K Dobscha; Travis I Lovejoy; Benjamin J Morasco; Anne E Kovas; Dawn M Peters; Kyle Hart; J Lucas Williams; Bentson H McFarland Journal: J Pain Date: 2016-04-04 Impact factor: 5.820
Authors: Esther L Meerwijk; Mary Jo Larson; Eric M Schmidt; Rachel Sayko Adams; Mark R Bauer; Grant A Ritter; Chester Buckenmaier; Alex H S Harris Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2019-10-28 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Janelle M Painter; Carol A Malte; Anna D Rubinsky; Timothy R Campellone; Amanda K Gilmore; John S Baer; Eric J Hawkins Journal: Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse Date: 2017-11-02 Impact factor: 3.829
Authors: Leslie R M Hausmann; Cynthia A Brandt; Constance M Carroll; Brenda T Fenton; Said A Ibrahim; William C Becker; Diana J Burgess; Laura D Wandner; Matthew J Bair; Joseph L Goulet Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2017-07-10 Impact factor: 4.794
Authors: Philip W Chui; Lori A Bastian; Eric DeRycke; Cynthia A Brandt; William C Becker; Joseph L Goulet Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2018-10-08 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Patrick J Knox; Corey B Simon; Ryan T Pohlig; Jenifer M Pugliese; Peter C Coyle; Jaclyn M Sions; Gregory E Hicks Journal: Clin J Pain Date: 2021-12-24 Impact factor: 3.442