BACKGROUND: Several pancreas procurement procedures have been used for porcine islet isolation; however, their impact on outcomes has not been extensively studied. We evaluated an advanced procurement technique for porcine islet isolation designed to reduce warm ischemia, to remove blood content, and enhance cooling of the pancreas by implementing a vascular flush and ductal preservation. METHOD: Pancreata procured from adult Landrace pigs were divided into 3 different surgical protocols: Pancreatectomy utilizing only surface cooling (group 1; n = 24); surface cooling and ductal injection with cold preservation solution before pancreatectomy (group 2; n = 12); or surface cooling, ductal injection, and an approach by selectively flushing through the celiac trunk and the superior mesenteric artery (group 3; n = 14). We assessed the islet isolation results and quality using in vitro and in vivo assays. RESULTS: Significantly higher overall yield and islet yield per gram pancreas were obtained from group 3 pigs compared with the other groups. Measurements of islet viability after 7 days of culture, as assessed by oxygen consumption rate per DNA, showed that group 3 islets displayed the highest values. Sustained normoglycemia was observed in diabetic nude mice transplanted with 2000 islet equivalents from all 3 groups. DISCUSSION: This study demonstrated that an advanced pancreas procurement technique including ductal preservation and selective arterial flush with cold preservation solution provided significant improvements in porcine islet isolation outcomes. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
BACKGROUND: Several pancreas procurement procedures have been used for porcine islet isolation; however, their impact on outcomes has not been extensively studied. We evaluated an advanced procurement technique for porcine islet isolation designed to reduce warm ischemia, to remove blood content, and enhance cooling of the pancreas by implementing a vascular flush and ductal preservation. METHOD: Pancreata procured from adult Landrace pigs were divided into 3 different surgical protocols: Pancreatectomy utilizing only surface cooling (group 1; n = 24); surface cooling and ductal injection with cold preservation solution before pancreatectomy (group 2; n = 12); or surface cooling, ductal injection, and an approach by selectively flushing through the celiac trunk and the superior mesenteric artery (group 3; n = 14). We assessed the islet isolation results and quality using in vitro and in vivo assays. RESULTS: Significantly higher overall yield and islet yield per gram pancreas were obtained from group 3 pigs compared with the other groups. Measurements of islet viability after 7 days of culture, as assessed by oxygen consumption rate per DNA, showed that group 3 islets displayed the highest values. Sustained normoglycemia was observed in diabeticnude mice transplanted with 2000 islet equivalents from all 3 groups. DISCUSSION: This study demonstrated that an advanced pancreas procurement technique including ductal preservation and selective arterial flush with cold preservation solution provided significant improvements in porcine islet isolation outcomes. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Authors: Jonathan R T Lakey; Norman M Kneteman; Ray V Rajotte; Douglas C Wu; David Bigam; A M James Shapiro Journal: Transplantation Date: 2002-04-15 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: C Ricordi; D W Gray; B J Hering; D B Kaufman; G L Warnock; N M Kneteman; S P Lake; N J London; C Socci; R Alejandro Journal: Acta Diabetol Lat Date: 1990 Jul-Sep
Authors: Bernhard J Hering; Martin Wijkstrom; Melanie L Graham; Maria Hårdstedt; Tor C Aasheim; Tun Jie; Jeffrey D Ansite; Masahiko Nakano; Jane Cheng; Wei Li; Kathleen Moran; Uwe Christians; Colleen Finnegan; Charles D Mills; David E Sutherland; Pratima Bansal-Pakala; Michael P Murtaugh; Nicole Kirchhof; Henk-Jan Schuurman Journal: Nat Med Date: 2006-02-19 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Nicole Kirchhof; Satoshi Shibata; Martin Wijkstrom; David M Kulick; Christopher T Salerno; Sue M Clemmings; Yves Heremans; Uri Galili; David E R Sutherland; Agustin P Dalmasso; Bernhard J Hering Journal: Xenotransplantation Date: 2004-09 Impact factor: 3.907
Authors: K K Papas; C K Colton; R A Nelson; P R Rozak; E S Avgoustiniatos; W E Scott; G M Wildey; A Pisania; G C Weir; B J Hering Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2007-01-04 Impact factor: 8.086
Authors: Bradley P Weegman; Thomas M Suszynski; William E Scott; Joana Ferrer Fábrega; Efstathios S Avgoustiniatos; Takayuki Anazawa; Timothy D O'Brien; Michael D Rizzari; Theodore Karatzas; Tun Jie; David E R Sutherland; Bernhard J Hering; Klearchos K Papas Journal: Xenotransplantation Date: 2014-07-05 Impact factor: 3.907
Authors: M D Rizzari; T M Suszynski; L S Kidder; S A Stein; T D O'Brien; V S K Sajja; W E Scott; V A Kirchner; B P Weegman; E S Avgoustiniatos; P W Todd; D J Kennedy; B E Hammer; D E R Sutherland; B J Hering; K K Papas Journal: Transplant Proc Date: 2010-12 Impact factor: 1.066
Authors: Bradley P Weegman; Venkata Sunil Kumar Sajja; Thomas M Suszynski; Michael D Rizzari; William E Scott Iii; Jennifer P Kitzmann; Kate R Mueller; Thomas R Hanley; David J Kennedy; Paul W Todd; Appakalai N Balamurugan; Bernhard J Hering; Klearchos K Papas Journal: J Diabetes Res Date: 2016-10-23 Impact factor: 4.011
Authors: Rachel Vanderschelden; Mayilone Sathialingam; Michael Alexander; Jonathan R T Lakey Journal: Cell Transplant Date: 2019-04-30 Impact factor: 4.064
Authors: Li Zhan; Joseph Sushil Rao; Nikhil Sethia; Michael Q Slama; Zonghu Han; Diane Tobolt; Michael Etheridge; Quinn P Peterson; Cari S Dutcher; John C Bischof; Erik B Finger Journal: Nat Med Date: 2022-03-14 Impact factor: 87.241
Authors: Yoshihide Nanno; Eric Sterner; Jeffrey C Gildersleeve; Bernhard J Hering; Christopher Burlak Journal: PLoS One Date: 2021-06-17 Impact factor: 3.240