BACKGROUND: Ensuring sufficient islet yield from preserved pancreases is a critical step in clinical islet transplantation. The aim of this study was to investigate whether pancreatic ductal injection, performed at procurement, using a small volume of preservation solution before cold storage (ductal preservation method) would improve islet yield and function from rat pancreases preserved for 6 and 24 hr. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Islets were isolated from Lewis rats. Pancreases were classified into five groups: fresh (group 1); preserved for 6 hr in University of Wisconsin solution without and with ductal preservation (groups 2 and 3); and preserved for 24 hr in University of Wisconsin solution without and with ductal preservation (groups 4 and 5). We assessed islet yield, function, and viability of pancreatic ductal cells. RESULTS: Islet yields per pancreas in groups 1 to 5 were 2010+/-774, 674+/-450, 1418+/-528, 527+/-263, and 1655+/-618 (islet equivalent) (+/-SD), respectively. Stimulation indices in groups 1 to 5 were 11.97+/-3.17, 6.48+/-4.04, 12.44+/-5.65, 2.56+/-2.03, and 5.55+/-2.71. Functional success rates in groups 1 to 5 were 100%, 0%, 100%, 0%, and 66.7%. Percentages of nonviable pancreatic duct cells in groups 1 to 5 were 3.8+/-2.7%, 59.7+/-4.4%, 19.5+/-7.3%, 64.7+/-4.5%, and 17.2+/-2.6%. In all experiments, the differences were significant between the groups without versus the groups with ductal preservation (P<0.05, group 2 vs. group 3 and group 4 vs. group 5). CONCLUSIONS: Ductal preservation improved islet yield and function after 6 and 24 hr of preservation. Well-preserved pancreatic ducts maintained good distribution of collagenase solution.
BACKGROUND: Ensuring sufficient islet yield from preserved pancreases is a critical step in clinical islet transplantation. The aim of this study was to investigate whether pancreatic ductal injection, performed at procurement, using a small volume of preservation solution before cold storage (ductal preservation method) would improve islet yield and function from rat pancreases preserved for 6 and 24 hr. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Islets were isolated from Lewis rats. Pancreases were classified into five groups: fresh (group 1); preserved for 6 hr in University of Wisconsin solution without and with ductal preservation (groups 2 and 3); and preserved for 24 hr in University of Wisconsin solution without and with ductal preservation (groups 4 and 5). We assessed islet yield, function, and viability of pancreatic ductal cells. RESULTS: Islet yields per pancreas in groups 1 to 5 were 2010+/-774, 674+/-450, 1418+/-528, 527+/-263, and 1655+/-618 (islet equivalent) (+/-SD), respectively. Stimulation indices in groups 1 to 5 were 11.97+/-3.17, 6.48+/-4.04, 12.44+/-5.65, 2.56+/-2.03, and 5.55+/-2.71. Functional success rates in groups 1 to 5 were 100%, 0%, 100%, 0%, and 66.7%. Percentages of nonviable pancreatic duct cells in groups 1 to 5 were 3.8+/-2.7%, 59.7+/-4.4%, 19.5+/-7.3%, 64.7+/-4.5%, and 17.2+/-2.6%. In all experiments, the differences were significant between the groups without versus the groups with ductal preservation (P<0.05, group 2 vs. group 3 and group 4 vs. group 5). CONCLUSIONS: Ductal preservation improved islet yield and function after 6 and 24 hr of preservation. Well-preserved pancreatic ducts maintained good distribution of collagenase solution.
Authors: Morihito Takita; Luis F Lara; Bashoo Naziruddin; Rauf Shahbazov; Michael C Lawrence; Peter T Kim; Nicholas Onaca; James S Burdick; Marlon F Levy Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2015-05-02 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: T Anazawa; A N Balamurugan; K K Papas; E S Avgoustiniatos; J Ferrer; S Matsumoto; D E R Sutherland; B J Hering Journal: Transplant Proc Date: 2010 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 1.066
Authors: Yasuhiro Iwanaga; David Er Sutherland; James V Harmon; Klearchos K Papas Journal: Curr Opin Organ Transplant Date: 2008-08 Impact factor: 2.640