Literature DB >> 20692207

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis after 20 years.

Alan H Handyside1.   

Abstract

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) should not be an option only for the few couples at risk of serious genetic conditions who can afford it. We appear to have lost sight of the original driving force behind the development of PGD, which is that most couples who carry a serious genetic disorder find it more acceptable to choose to conceive with healthy embryos tested in-vitro at preimplantation stages of development within the first week following fertilization, even if that means discarding those diagnosed as affected. It has been shown using cystic fibrosis as an example, that the cost savings to the US healthcare system of providing free IVF-PGD to all carrier couples compared to the lifetime costs of medical treatment for patients affected by this disease, run to dozens of billions of dollars. With the increasing emphasis in medicine on early diagnosis and prevention of disease together with the availability of new molecular genetic diagnostic tools, a national IVF-PGD programme seems to be the next step in modern health care.
Copyright © 2010 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20692207     DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2010.07.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online        ISSN: 1472-6483            Impact factor:   3.828


  8 in total

1.  Performing and Declining PGD: Accounts of Jewish Israeli Women Who Carry a BRCA1/2 Mutation or Partners of Male Mutation Carriers.

Authors:  Efrat Dagan; Daphna Birenbaum-Carmeli; Eitan Friedman; Baruch Feldman
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  PGD for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer: the route to universal tests for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers.

Authors:  Marion Drüsedau; Jos C Dreesen; Inge Derks-Smeets; Edith Coonen; Ron van Golde; Jannie van Echten-Arends; Peter M M Kastrop; Marinus J Blok; Encarna Gómez-García; Joep P Geraedts; Hubert J Smeets; Christine E de Die-Smulders; Aimée D Paulussen
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 4.246

3.  The morality of patents on pre-implantation genetic diagnosis.

Authors:  David B Resnik
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 4.  Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for inherited neurological disorders.

Authors:  Ilan Tur-Kaspa; Roohi Jeelani; P Murali Doraiswamy
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 42.937

5.  Prediction of a rare chromosomal aberration simultaneously with next generation sequencing-based comprehensive chromosome screening in human preimplantation embryos for recurrent pregnancy loss.

Authors:  Yi-Xuan Lee; Chien-Wen Chen; Yi-Hui Lin; Chii-Ruey Tzeng; Chi-Huang Chen
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-09-30       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 6.  Chromosomal disorders and male infertility.

Authors:  Gary L Harton; Helen G Tempest
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2011-11-28       Impact factor: 3.285

7.  Blastomere removal from cleavage-stage mouse embryos alters steroid metabolism during pregnancy.

Authors:  Atsushi Sugawara; Brittany Sato; Elise Bal; Abby C Collier; Monika A Ward
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2012-07-05       Impact factor: 4.285

8.  Biopsy of embryos produced by in vitro fertilization affects development in C57BL/6 mouse strain.

Authors:  Atsushi Sugawara; Monika A Ward
Journal:  Theriogenology       Date:  2012-11-19       Impact factor: 2.740

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.