Literature DB >> 20692104

Does stress alter everyday moral decision-making?

Katrin Starcke1, Christin Polzer, Oliver T Wolf, Matthias Brand.   

Abstract

Recent studies in the field of neuropsychological decision-making as well as moral psychology emphasize the role of emotions in decision-making. The current study examines whether stress affects moral decision-making. We induced stress in 20 participants with the Trier Social Stress Test (TSST) and also examined 20 participants in a control condition (Placebo TSST). The level of stress was assessed with questionnaires and endocrine markers (salivary cortisol and alpha-amylase). All participants performed a moral decision-making task in which everyday moral dilemmas were described. Dilemmas varied in emotional intensity and each offered a rather egoistic and a rather altruistic option. Results show that groups did not differ significantly in everyday moral decision-making. However, cortisol responses and egoistic decision-making in emotional dilemmas were positively correlated. Our results indicate that stress per se does not cause more egoistic decision-making in the current setting but suggest an association between the individual's cortisol stress response and egoistic decision-making in high-emotional situations.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20692104     DOI: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2010.07.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychoneuroendocrinology        ISSN: 0306-4530            Impact factor:   4.905


  35 in total

1.  On the spot ethical decision-making in CBRN (chemical, biological, radiological or nuclear event) response: approaches to on the spot ethical decision-making for first responders to large-scale chemical incidents.

Authors:  Andrew P Rebera; Chaim Rafalowski
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Altruism under Stress: Cortisol Negatively Predicts Charitable Giving and Neural Value Representations Depending on Mentalizing Capacity.

Authors:  Stefan Schulreich; Anita Tusche; Philipp Kanske; Lars Schwabe
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 6.709

3.  Inter-brain neural mechanism underlying turn-based interaction under acute stress in women: a hyperscanning study using functional near-infrared spectroscopy.

Authors:  Hanxuan Zhao; Yadan Li; Xuewei Wang; Yuecui Kan; Sihua Xu; Haijun Duan
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 4.235

4.  Stressed connections: cortisol levels following acute psychosocial stress disrupt affiliative mimicry in humans.

Authors:  Jonas P Nitschke; Cecile S Sunahara; Evan W Carr; Piotr Winkielman; Jens C Pruessner; Jennifer A Bartz
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Trolley dilemma in the sky: Context matters when civilians and cadets make remotely piloted aircraft decisions.

Authors:  Markus Christen; Darcia Narvaez; Julaine D Zenk; Michael Villano; Charles R Crowell; Daniel R Moore
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Social modulation of decision-making: a cross-species review.

Authors:  Ruud van den Bos; Jolle W Jolles; Judith R Homberg
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  The Foreign Language Effect on Moral Judgment: The Role of Emotions and Norms.

Authors:  Janet Geipel; Constantinos Hadjichristidis; Luca Surian
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Stress effects on mood, HPA axis, and autonomic response: comparison of three psychosocial stress paradigms.

Authors:  Grace E Giles; Caroline R Mahoney; Tad T Brunyé; Holly A Taylor; Robin B Kanarek
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Editorial: Decision-making under stress: the importance of cortico-limbic circuits.

Authors:  Ruud van den Bos; Gert Flik
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 3.558

Review 10.  Stress leads to prosocial action in immediate need situations.

Authors:  Tony W Buchanan; Stephanie D Preston
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 3.558

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.