Literature DB >> 20691843

Platelet response to clopidogrel and restenosis in patients treated predominantly with drug-eluting stents.

Stefanie Schulz1, Dirk Sibbing, Sigmund Braun, Tanja Morath, Julinda Mehilli, Steffen Massberg, Robert A Byrne, Albert Schömig, Adnan Kastrati.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Preclinical studies suggest a relationship between early thrombotic response after vascular injury and later development of restenosis. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of platelet response to clopidogrel on the risk of restenosis after drug-eluting stenting (DES).
METHODS: A total of 1,608 consecutive patients were previously enrolled in a study on the relation between platelet reactivity and outcomes after DES. All patients received a loading dose of 600 mg clopidogrel. Blood samples for the assessment of adenosine diphosphate-induced platelet aggregation with multiple electrode platelet aggregometry were drawn directly before percutaneous coronary intervention. Clopidogrel low response was defined as upper quintile of multiple electrode platelet aggregometry measurements. Accordingly, 323 patients (20%) were considered as low and 1,285 (80%) as normal responders. Primary end point of the present study was target lesion revascularization at 1 year. Secondary end points included binary angiographic restenosis and late lumen loss at 6- to 8-month angiography.
RESULTS: Target lesion revascularization rates were comparable in both groups (10.9% vs 9.5%, hazard rate [HR] 1.2, 95% CI 0.8-1.7, P = .441). Follow-up angiography revealed no difference in binary angiographic restenosis (13.9% vs 15.9%, P = .445) and late lumen loss (0.32 +/- 0.64 vs 0.35 +/- 0.63 mm, P = .477). Low responders had significantly more stent thromboses (2.5% vs 0.5%, HR 5.4, 95% CI 1.9-15.6, P = .002), Q wave myocardial infarctions (2.5% vs 0.6%, HR 4.0, 95% CI 1.5-10.7, P = .005), and ischemic strokes (1.3% vs 0.2%, HR 5.4, 95% CI 1.2-24.0, P = .028) at 1 year.
CONCLUSION: Low platelet responsiveness to clopidogrel, a known predictor of thrombotic complications, does not have a significant impact on restenosis after DES. Copyright 2010 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20691843     DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2010.05.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  5 in total

1.  Resistance to Clopidogrel among Iranian Patients Undergoing Angioplasty Intervention.

Authors:  Mohammad Haji Aghajani; Farzad Kobarfard; Olia Safi; Kourosh Sheibani; Mohammad Sistanizad
Journal:  Iran J Pharm Res       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 1.696

2.  CYP2C192 Polymorphism in Chilean Patients with In-Stent Restenosis Development and Controls.

Authors:  Jenny Ruedlinger; Yalena Prado; Tomás Zambrano; Nicolás Saavedra; Braulio Bobadilla; Marcelo Potthoff; Luis Pérez; Fernando Lanas; Luis A Salazar
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  The Impact of Clopidogrel Resistance on Clinical Outcome of Iranian Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Authors:  Mohammad Haji Aghajani; Farzad Kobarfard; Seyed Pouzhia Shojaei; Froozan Ahmadpour; Olia Safi; Neda Kazemina; Naeime Zarepishe; Mohammad Sistanizad
Journal:  Iran J Pharm Res       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 1.696

4.  Impacts of CYP2C19 Polymorphism and Clopidogrel Dosing on in-Stent Restenosis: A Retrospective Cohort Study in Chinese Patients.

Authors:  Min Zhang; Jiangrong Wang; Yong Zhang; Pei Zhang; Zhisheng Jia; Manyi Ren; Xiaomeng Jia; Liping Ma; Mei Gao; Yinglong Hou
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 4.162

5.  Platelet Function Testing-Guided Antiplatelet Therapy.

Authors:  Ekaterina Lenk; Michael Spannagl
Journal:  EJIFCC       Date:  2013-02-21
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.