PURPOSE: The spontaneous breathing trial (SBT)-relying on objective criteria assessed by the clinician-is the major diagnostic tool to determine if patients can be successfully extubated. However, little is known regarding the patient's subjective perception of autonomous breathing. METHODS: We performed a prospective observational study in 211 mechanically ventilated adult patients successfully completing a SBT. Patients were randomly assigned to be interviewed during this trial regarding their prediction of extubation success. We compared post-extubation outcomes in three patient groups: patients confident (confidents; n = 115) or not (non-confidents; n = 38) of their extubation success and patients not subjected to interview (control group; n = 58). RESULTS:Extubation success was more frequent in confidents than in non-confidents (90 vs. 45%; p < 0.001/positive likelihood ratio = 2.00) or in the control group (90 vs. 78%; p = 0.04). On the contrary, extubation failure was more common in non-confidents than in confidents (55 vs. 10%; p < 0.001/negative likelihood ratio = 0.19). Logistic regression analysis showed that extubation success was associated with patient's prediction [OR (95% CI): 9.2 (3.74-22.42) for confidents vs.non-confidents] as well as to age [0.72 (0.66-0.78) for age 75 vs. 65 and 1.31 (1.28-1.51) for age 55 vs. 65]. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that at the end of a sustained SBT, extubation success might be correlated to the patients' subjective perception of autonomous breathing. The results of this study should be confirmed by a large multicenter trial.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: The spontaneous breathing trial (SBT)-relying on objective criteria assessed by the clinician-is the major diagnostic tool to determine if patients can be successfully extubated. However, little is known regarding the patient's subjective perception of autonomous breathing. METHODS: We performed a prospective observational study in 211 mechanically ventilated adult patients successfully completing a SBT. Patients were randomly assigned to be interviewed during this trial regarding their prediction of extubation success. We compared post-extubation outcomes in three patient groups: patients confident (confidents; n = 115) or not (non-confidents; n = 38) of their extubation success and patients not subjected to interview (control group; n = 58). RESULTS: Extubation success was more frequent in confidents than in non-confidents (90 vs. 45%; p < 0.001/positive likelihood ratio = 2.00) or in the control group (90 vs. 78%; p = 0.04). On the contrary, extubation failure was more common in non-confidents than in confidents (55 vs. 10%; p < 0.001/negative likelihood ratio = 0.19). Logistic regression analysis showed that extubation success was associated with patient's prediction [OR (95% CI): 9.2 (3.74-22.42) for confidents vs.non-confidents] as well as to age [0.72 (0.66-0.78) for age 75 vs. 65 and 1.31 (1.28-1.51) for age 55 vs. 65]. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that at the end of a sustained SBT, extubation success might be correlated to the patients' subjective perception of autonomous breathing. The results of this study should be confirmed by a large multicenter trial.
Authors: N R MacIntyre; D J Cook; E W Ely; S K Epstein; J B Fink; J E Heffner; D Hess; R D Hubmayer; D J Scheinhorn Journal: Chest Date: 2001-12 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Armand Mekontso-Dessap; Nicolas de Prost; Emmanuelle Girou; François Braconnier; François Lemaire; Christian Brun-Buisson; Laurent Brochard Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2006-08-29 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: A Esteban; I Alía; M J Tobin; A Gil; F Gordo; I Vallverdú; L Blanch; A Bonet; A Vázquez; R de Pablo; A Torres; M A de La Cal; S Macías Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 1999-02 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Miquel Ferrer; Mauricio Valencia; Josep Maria Nicolas; Oscar Bernadich; Joan Ramon Badia; Antoni Torres Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2005-10-13 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: John McCaffrey; Clare Farrell; Paul Whiting; Arina Dan; Sean M Bagshaw; Anthony P Delaney Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2009-04-08 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Maria Elena Ochoa; Maria del Carmen Marín; Fernando Frutos-Vivar; Federico Gordo; Jaime Latour-Pérez; Enrique Calvo; Andres Esteban Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2009-04-28 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Massimo Antonelli; Elie Azoulay; Marc Bonten; Jean Chastre; Giuseppe Citerio; Giorgio Conti; Daniel De Backer; Herwig Gerlach; Goran Hedenstierna; Michael Joannidis; Duncan Macrae; Jordi Mancebo; Salvatore M Maggiore; Alexandre Mebazaa; Jean-Charles Preiser; Jerôme Pugin; Jan Wernerman; Haibo Zhang Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2011-02-03 Impact factor: 17.440