Literature DB >> 20688348

How to live at very low substrate concentration.

Thomas Egli1.   

Abstract

Availability of carbon/energy sources and temperature are the two environmental factors that severely restrict heterotrophic growth in most ecosystems. DOC concentrations in ground, drinking and surface waters are typically in the range of 0.5-5 mg/L, but most of this is present in a polymeric, inaccessible form for microbes. Concentrations of microbiologically available carbon compounds (so-called assimilable organic carbon, AOC) are usually in the range of 10-100 μg/L, those of individual sugars or amino acids are not higher than a few μg/L. Until recently microbiologists assumed that such nutrient-poor (oligotrophic) environments are "deserts" for life, and that the majority of bacterial cells seen in the microscope are dead, dormant or at least severely starved. Nevertheless, despite the low concentrations of available carbon compounds, bacterial cell numbers recorded in these environments typically are in the range of 10(5)-10(6) per mL. Over the last years, we have learnt that most of these microbes are perfectly alive, metabolizing and ready to grow when given the chance. Hence, microbes have adapted and developed strategies to cope with this situation. Laboratory studies with pure cultures suggest that bacterial cells have developed two strategies to live under such conditions. The first strategy is to perform a "multivorous" way of life by taking up and metabolizing dozens of different carbon substrates simultaneously (i.e., they are NOT specializing on a particular substrate, which they can take up with very high affinity). This "mixed substrate growth" equips the cell with a kinetic advantage and metabolic flexibility. Simultaneous utilization of a multitude of carbon substrates allows fast growth at minute concentrations of individual substrates. The second strategy is to minimize maintenance requirements (unfortunately we still know little about how this is achieved). Recently, flow cytometry has been employed to study microbial growth in very dilute, nutrient-poor environments. The technique allows fast and easy quantification of microbial growth of natural bacterial communities, including "uncultivable" members, under environmental conditions. When combined with strain-specific fluorescent immunoprobes, this technique allows investigation of the growth and competition of pathogens with the indigenous microbial flora. This method is particularly suited for studying questions concerning microbial growth and survival in drinking water systems.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20688348     DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2010.07.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Water Res        ISSN: 0043-1354            Impact factor:   11.236


  35 in total

1.  Enhanced growth of Acidovorax sp. strain 2AN during nitrate-dependent Fe(II) oxidation in batch and continuous-flow systems.

Authors:  Anirban Chakraborty; Eric E Roden; Jürgen Schieber; Flynn Picardal
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-10-14       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Kinetics and yields of pesticide biodegradation at low substrate concentrations and under conditions restricting assimilable organic carbon.

Authors:  Damian E Helbling; Frederik Hammes; Thomas Egli; Hans-Peter E Kohler
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-12-06       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Genome-wide transcriptional responses to carbon starvation in nongrowing Lactococcus lactis.

Authors:  Onur Ercan; Michiel Wels; Eddy J Smid; Michiel Kleerebezem
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Physiological and proteomic adaptation of "Aromatoleum aromaticum" EbN1 to low growth rates in benzoate-limited, anoxic chemostats.

Authors:  Kathleen Trautwein; Sven Lahme; Lars Wöhlbrand; Christoph Feenders; Kai Mangelsdorf; Jens Harder; Alexander Steinbüchel; Bernd Blasius; Richard Reinhardt; Ralf Rabus
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2012-02-24       Impact factor: 3.490

5.  In situ substrate preferences of abundant bacterioplankton populations in a prealpine freshwater lake.

Authors:  Michaela M Salcher; Thomas Posch; Jakob Pernthaler
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 10.302

6.  Simultaneous catabolism of plant-derived aromatic compounds results in enhanced growth for members of the Roseobacter lineage.

Authors:  Christopher A Gulvik; Alison Buchan
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-04-05       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Effect of glucose on the fatty acid composition of Cupriavidus necator JMP134 during 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid degradation: implications for lipid-based stable isotope probing methods.

Authors:  Thomas Z Lerch; Marie-France Dignac; Enrique Barriuso; André Mariotti
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-08-19       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Deciphering the role of Paenibacillus strain Q8 in the organic matter recycling in the acid mine drainage of Carnoulès.

Authors:  François Delavat; Vincent Phalip; Anne Forster; Marie-Claire Lett; Didier Lièvremont
Journal:  Microb Cell Fact       Date:  2012-02-03       Impact factor: 5.328

9.  Application of meta-transcriptomics and -proteomics to analysis of in situ physiological state.

Authors:  Allan Konopka; Michael J Wilkins
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2012-05-18       Impact factor: 5.640

10.  Response to substrate limitation by a marine sulfate-reducing bacterium.

Authors:  Angeliki Marietou; Kasper U Kjeldsen; Clemens Glombitza; Bo Barker Jørgensen
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 10.302

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.