Literature DB >> 20687813

Effect of micro- and macroporosity of bone tissue three-dimensional-poly(epsilon-caprolactone) scaffold on human mesenchymal stem cells invasion, proliferation, and differentiation in vitro.

Aurelio Salerno1, Daniela Guarnieri, Maria Iannone, Stefania Zeppetelli, Paolo A Netti.   

Abstract

The design of porous scaffolds able to promote and guide cell proliferation, colonization, and biosynthesis in three dimensions is key determinant in bone tissue engineering (bTE). The aim of this study was to assess the role of the micro-architecture of poly(epsilon-caprolactone) scaffolds in affecting human mesenchymal stem cells' (hMSCs) spatial organization, proliferation, and osteogenic differentiation in vitro. Poly(epsilon-caprolactone) scaffolds for bTE and characterized by mono-modal and bi-modal pore size distributions were prepared by the combination of gas foaming and selective polymer extraction from co-continuous blends. The topological properties of the pore structure of the scaffolds were analyzed and the results correlated with the ability of hMSCs to proliferate, infiltrate, and differentiate in vitro in three dimensions. Results showed that the micro-architecture of the pore structure of the scaffolds plays a crucial role in defining cell seeding efficiency as well as hMSCs' three-dimensional colonization, proliferation, and osteogenic differentiation. Taken all together, our results indicated that process technologies able to allow a fine-tune of the topological properties of biodegradable porous scaffolds are essential for bTE strategies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20687813     DOI: 10.1089/ten.tea.2009.0494

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A        ISSN: 1937-3341            Impact factor:   3.845


  7 in total

Review 1.  Bone tissue engineering: recent advances and challenges.

Authors:  Ami R Amini; Cato T Laurencin; Syam P Nukavarapu
Journal:  Crit Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2012

Review 2.  Microfabricated biomaterials for engineering 3D tissues.

Authors:  Pinar Zorlutuna; Nasim Annabi; Gulden Camci-Unal; Mehdi Nikkhah; Jae Min Cha; Jason W Nichol; Amir Manbachi; Hojae Bae; Shaochen Chen; Ali Khademhosseini
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 30.849

Review 3.  Modeling Physiological Events in 2D vs. 3D Cell Culture.

Authors:  Kayla Duval; Hannah Grover; Li-Hsin Han; Yongchao Mou; Adrian F Pegoraro; Jeffery Fredberg; Zi Chen
Journal:  Physiology (Bethesda)       Date:  2017-07

4.  Blends of thermoplastic polyurethane and polydimethylsiloxane rubber: assessment of biocompatibility and suture holding strength of membranes.

Authors:  Krishna Prasad Rajan; Ahmed Al-Ghamdi; Ramesh Parameswar; G B Nando
Journal:  Int J Biomater       Date:  2013-12-18

Review 5.  Current strategies with implementation of three-dimensional cell culture: the challenge of quantification.

Authors:  Jonathan Temple; Eirini Velliou; Mona Shehata; Raphaël Lévy
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2022-08-12       Impact factor: 4.661

6.  Hybrid Ti6Al4V/Silk Fibroin Composite for Load-Bearing Implants: A Hierarchical Multifunctional Cellular Scaffold.

Authors:  Simone Murchio; Matteo Benedetti; Anastasia Berto; Francesca Agostinacchio; Gianluca Zappini; Devid Maniglio
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-09-05       Impact factor: 3.748

7.  Culture & differentiation of mesenchymal stem cell into osteoblast on degradable biomedical composite scaffold: In vitro study.

Authors:  Krishan G Jain; Sujata Mohanty; Alok R Ray; Rajesh Malhotra; Balram Airan
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.375

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.