Literature DB >> 20687220

Organ-wide telomeric status in diseased and disease-free prostatic tissues.

Christopher M Heaphy1, Trisha M Fleet, Eric G Treat, Sang-Joon Lee, Anthony Y Smith, Michael S Davis, Jeffrey K Griffith, Edgar G Fischer, Marco Bisoffi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Telomere attrition occurs early in the development of prostatic adenocarcinoma. However, little is known about either telomere status in benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), or the spatial and organ-wide distribution of potential telomere aberrations throughout all areas of prostatic glands affected by cancer or BPH.
METHODS: Slot blot titration assay was used to determine telomere DNA content (TC), a proxy for telomere length, in macrodissected tissue consisting of 54 normal samples from 5 disease-free prostates, 128 BPH samples from 4 non-cancerous prostates, and 45 tumor, 73 BPH, and 4 prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) samples from 5 cancerous prostates.
RESULTS: Compared to TC in normal prostate samples (n = 54; TC mean = 0.98), tumor samples displayed telomere attrition (n = 45; TC mean = 0.67). TC in PIN samples was similar to tumors. TC in BPH samples from cancerous prostates was similar to TC in tumors and also displayed telomere shortening (n = 73; TC mean = 0.76), whereas BPH samples from non-cancerous prostates displayed longer telomeres (n = 128; TC mean = 1.06). In prostates affected by adenocarcinoma, areas of potential telomere attrition occurred in histologically normal tissues through the entire gland. However, three-dimensional zoning revealed a pattern of increasing TC as a function of distance from the primary (index) tumor.
CONCLUSIONS: Spatial distributions of TC in prostate specimens indicate a complex "field effect" with varying contributions from both cancer and BPH. The observation that telomere length variations occur in fields of histologically normal tissues surrounding the tumor is of clinical importance, as it may have implications for the diagnosis and focal therapy of prostate cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20687220      PMCID: PMC3920907          DOI: 10.1002/pros.21182

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prostate        ISSN: 0270-4137            Impact factor:   4.104


  34 in total

1.  Telomerase activity, telomere length, and DNA ploidy in prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN).

Authors:  K S Koeneman; C X Pan; J K Jin; J M Pyle; R C Flanigan; T V Shankey; M O Diaz
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 2.  Making the most out of six systematic sextant biopsies.

Authors:  T A Stamey
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 2.649

3.  The extent and multicentricity of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia in clinically localized prostatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  J Qian; P Wollan; D G Bostwick
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 3.466

Review 4.  Prevalent mutations in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jin-Tang Dong
Journal:  J Cell Biochem       Date:  2006-02-15       Impact factor: 4.429

5.  Morphologic and clinical significance of multifocal prostate cancers in radical prostatectomy specimens.

Authors:  Alphaeus M Wise; Thomas A Stamey; John E McNeal; John L Clayton
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 6.  Telomere-driven genomic instability in cancer cells.

Authors:  Chantal Desmaze; Jean-Charles Soria; Marie-Anne Freulet-Marrière; Noelle Mathieu; Laure Sabatier
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 8.679

7.  Telomerase activity: a prevalent marker of malignant human prostate tissue.

Authors:  H J Sommerfeld; A K Meeker; M A Piatyszek; G S Bova; J W Shay; D S Coffey
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1996-01-01       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  Telomerase activity in human bladder cancer.

Authors:  Y Lin; H Miyamoto; K Fujinami; H Uemura; M Hosaka; Y Iwasaki; Y Kubota
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 9.  Focal therapy for localized prostate cancer: a critical appraisal of rationale and modalities.

Authors:  Scott E Eggener; Peter T Scardino; Peter R Carroll; Michael J Zelefsky; Oliver Sartor; Hedvig Hricak; Thomas M Wheeler; Samson W Fine; John Trachtenberg; Mark A Rubin; Mak Ohori; Kentaro Kuroiwa; Michel Rossignol; Lucien Abenhaim
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-10-15       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Clinical implications and utility of field cancerization.

Authors:  Gabriel D Dakubo; John P Jakupciak; Mark A Birch-Machin; Ryan L Parr
Journal:  Cancer Cell Int       Date:  2007-03-15       Impact factor: 5.722

View more
  12 in total

1.  Prostate stromal cell telomere shortening is associated with risk of prostate cancer in the placebo arm of the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial.

Authors:  Christopher M Heaphy; Gaurav Gaonkar; Sarah B Peskoe; Corinne E Joshu; Angelo M De Marzo; M Scott Lucia; Phyllis J Goodman; Scott M Lippman; Ian M Thompson; Elizabeth A Platz; Alan K Meeker
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2015-04-20       Impact factor: 4.104

2.  Early growth response 1 and fatty acid synthase expression is altered in tumor adjacent prostate tissue and indicates field cancerization.

Authors:  Anna C Jones; Kristina A Trujillo; Genevieve K Phillips; Trisha M Fleet; Jaclyn K Murton; Virginia Severns; Satyan K Shah; Michael S Davis; Anthony Y Smith; Jeffrey K Griffith; Edgar G Fischer; Marco Bisoffi
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2011-11-29       Impact factor: 4.104

3.  Racial Difference in Prostate Cancer Cell Telomere Lengths in Men with Higher Grade Prostate Cancer: A Clue to the Racial Disparity in Prostate Cancer Outcomes.

Authors:  Christopher M Heaphy; Corinne E Joshu; John R Barber; Christine Davis; Reza Zarinshenas; Angelo M De Marzo; Tamara L Lotan; Karen S Sfanos; Alan K Meeker; Elizabeth A Platz
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 4.254

4.  Race Differences in Telomere Length in Benign Prostate Biopsies and Subsequent Risk of Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Benjamin A Rybicki; Sudha M Sadasivan; Yalei Chen; Ian Loveless; Nilesh S Gupta; Dhananjay A Chitale; Sean R Williamson; Andrew G Rundle; Deliang L Tang
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 4.090

5.  Using the epigenetic field defect to detect prostate cancer in biopsy negative patients.

Authors:  Matthew Truong; Bing Yang; Andrew Livermore; Jennifer Wagner; Puspha Weeratunga; Wei Huang; Rajiv Dhir; Joel Nelson; Daniel W Lin; David F Jarrard
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Prostate cancer cell telomere length variability and stromal cell telomere length as prognostic markers for metastasis and death.

Authors:  Christopher M Heaphy; Ghil Suk Yoon; Sarah B Peskoe; Corinne E Joshu; Thomas K Lee; Edward Giovannucci; Lorelei A Mucci; Stacey A Kenfield; Meir J Stampfer; Jessica L Hicks; Angelo M De Marzo; Elizabeth A Platz; Alan K Meeker
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 39.397

7.  Markers of field cancerization: proposed clinical applications in prostate biopsies.

Authors:  Kristina A Trujillo; Anna C Jones; Jeffrey K Griffith; Marco Bisoffi
Journal:  Prostate Cancer       Date:  2012-05-14

8.  Obesity is Associated with Shorter Telomere Length in Prostate Stromal Cells in Men with Aggressive Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Corinne E Joshu; Christopher M Heaphy; John R Barber; Jiayun Lu; Reza Zarinshenas; Christine Davis; Misop Han; Tamara L Lotan; Karen S Sfanos; Angelo M De Marzo; Alan K Meeker; Elizabeth A Platz
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2020-12-22

Review 9.  The potential utility of telomere-related markers for cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Christopher M Heaphy; Alan K Meeker
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 5.310

10.  Prostate field cancerization: deregulated expression of macrophage inhibitory cytokine 1 (MIC-1) and platelet derived growth factor A (PDGF-A) in tumor adjacent tissue.

Authors:  Anna C Jones; Kresta S Antillon; Shannon M Jenkins; Sara N Janos; Heidi N Overton; Dor S Shoshan; Edgar G Fischer; Kristina A Trujillo; Marco Bisoffi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.