Literature DB >> 20687214

High-resolution animal PET imaging of prostate cancer xenografts with three different 64Cu-labeled antibodies against native cell-adherent PSMA.

Karen Alt1, Stefan Wiehr, Walter Ehrlichmann, Gerald Reischl, Philipp Wolf, Bernd J Pichler, Ursula Elsässer-Beile, Patrick Bühler.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is expressed by virtually all prostate cancers and represents an ideal target for diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. This article compares the in vivo behavior and tumor uptake of three different radiolabeled anti-PSMA monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and corresponding F(ab)(2) and Fab fragments thereof.
METHODS: The mAbs 3/A12, 3/F11, and 3/E7 and fragments of 3/A12 were conjugated with the chelating agent DOTA and radiolabeled with 64Cu. For the microPET imaging studies, SCID mice bearing PSMA-positive C4-2 and PSMA-negative DU 145 prostate cancer xenografts were used. Each animal received 20-30 microg radiolabeled mAb or fragment corresponding to an activity of 8-14 MBq. Imaging was performed 3, 24, and 48 hr post-injection. After the last scan, mice were sacrificed and tracer in vivo biodistribution was measured by gamma-counting.
RESULTS: Static microPET images of mice with PSMA-positive tumors revealed a high uptake of the mAbs in the C4-2 tumors at 24 and 48 hr after tracer injection and only a minimal distribution in the DU 145 tumors and other organs. In contrast, the F(ab)(2) and Fab fragments of 3/A12 were detected at a high extend in the kidney but not in the C4-2 tumors. These results were confirmed by gamma counting of dissected organs after the final imaging.
CONCLUSIONS: Due to the high and specific uptake of the 64Cu-labeled mAbs in PSMA-positive tumors, these antibodies represent excellent tools for prostate cancer imaging.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20687214     DOI: 10.1002/pros.21176

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prostate        ISSN: 0270-4137            Impact factor:   4.104


  22 in total

1.  2-(3-{1-Carboxy-5-[(6-[18F]fluoro-pyridine-3-carbonyl)-amino]-pentyl}-ureido)-pentanedioic acid, [18F]DCFPyL, a PSMA-based PET imaging agent for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ying Chen; Mrudula Pullambhatla; Catherine A Foss; Youngjoo Byun; Sridhar Nimmagadda; Srinivasan Senthamizhchelvan; George Sgouros; Ronnie C Mease; Martin G Pomper
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2011-10-31       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 2.  GCPII imaging and cancer.

Authors:  C A Foss; R C Mease; S Y Cho; H J Kim; M G Pomper
Journal:  Curr Med Chem       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 3.  The prostate-specific membrane antigen: lessons and current clinical implications from 20 years of research.

Authors:  Benjamin T Ristau; Denise S O'Keefe; Dean J Bacich
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2013-12-08       Impact factor: 3.498

Review 4.  The evolution of imaging in cancer: current state and future challenges.

Authors:  Luke J Higgins; Martin G Pomper
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.929

5.  Advances in immuno-positron emission tomography: antibodies for molecular imaging in oncology.

Authors:  Scott M Knowles; Anna M Wu
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-09-17       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 6.  Molecular imaging of prostate cancer: PET radiotracers.

Authors:  Hossein Jadvar
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 7.  PET imaging in prostate cancer: focus on prostate-specific membrane antigen.

Authors:  Ronnie C Mease; Catherine A Foss; Martin G Pomper
Journal:  Curr Top Med Chem       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 8.  Glutamate carboxypeptidase II in diagnosis and treatment of neurologic disorders and prostate cancer.

Authors:  C Bařinka; C Rojas; B Slusher; M Pomper
Journal:  Curr Med Chem       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  Comparison of [¹¹C]choline ([¹¹C]CHO) and S(+)-β-methyl-[¹¹C]choline ([¹¹C]SMC) as imaging probes for prostate cancer in a PC-3 prostate cancer xenograft model.

Authors:  Sarah Marie Schwarzenböck; Jana Gertz; Michael Souvatzoglou; Jens Kurth; David Sachs; Roman Nawroth; Uwe Treiber; Tibor Schuster; Reingard Senekowitsch-Schmidtke; Markus Schwaiger; Sibylle Ilse Ziegler; Gjermund Henriksen; Hans-Jürgen Wester; Bernd Joachim Krause
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.488

10.  ImmunoPET: Concept, Design, and Applications.

Authors:  Weijun Wei; Zachary T Rosenkrans; Jianjun Liu; Gang Huang; Quan-Yong Luo; Weibo Cai
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2020-03-23       Impact factor: 60.622

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.