Literature DB >> 20686484

Hypertension impairs myocardial blood perfusion reserve in subjects without regional myocardial ischemia.

Hiroshi Nakajima1, Katsuya Onishi, Tairo Kurita, Masaki Ishida, Motonori Nagata, Kakuya Kitagawa, Kaoru Dohi, Mashio Nakamura, Hajime Sakuma, Masaaki Ito.   

Abstract

Quantitative analysis of myocardial perfusion MRI can provide noninvasive assessments of myocardial perfusion reserve (MPR), which is associated with endothelial function. Endothelial function is influenced by various factors, including hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, renal dysfunction and anemia. The purpose of this study was to evaluate which risk factor is the strongest effector of MPR in subjects without regional myocardial ischemia. We studied 110 patients (66 years ±10, male 68%, hypertension 76%, diabetes mellitus (DM) 40% and dyslipidemia 65%) without regional myocardial ischemia. Adenosine triphosphate (ATP) stress and rest first-pass perfusion magnetic resonance (MR) images were acquired with a 1.5-T MR system, and MPR was calculated as the ratio of stress to rest myocardial blood flow (MBF). Average rest MBF in 110 patients was 1.07±0.62 ml min⁻¹ g⁻¹, whereas stress MBF was 3.15±1.93 ml min⁻¹ g⁻¹ and the MPR was 3.33±1.82. Rest MBF correlated significantly with hematocrit, whereas stress MBF showed a strong correlation with estimated glomerular filtration rate (e-GFR). MPR was associated with hypertension, age, e-GFR, hematocrit and left ventricular mass index (LVMI). In multiple regression analysis, hypertension (P=0.003, β=-0.274) showed the strongest correlation with MPR among other risk factors, such as diabetes (P=ns), dyslipidemia (P=ns), e-GFR (P=ns), LVMI (P=0.007, β=-0.248) and hematocrit (P=ns) after adjusting age and gender. Hypertension is the most important effector of MPR in subjects without myocardial ischemia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20686484     DOI: 10.1038/hr.2010.140

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hypertens Res        ISSN: 0916-9636            Impact factor:   3.872


  7 in total

1.  Improved quantification of myocardial blood flow using highly constrained back projection reconstruction.

Authors:  David Chen; Behzad Sharif; Rohan Dharmakumar; Louise E J Thomson; C Noel Bairey Merz; Daniel S Berman; Debiao Li
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Association of ambulatory blood pressure with coronary microvascular and cardiac dysfunction in asymptomatic type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Jian L Yeo; Gaurav S Gulsin; Emer M Brady; Abhishek Dattani; Joanna M Bilak; Anna-Marie Marsh; Manjit Sian; Lavanya Athithan; Kelly S Parke; Joanne Wormleighton; Matthew P M Graham-Brown; Anvesha Singh; J Ranjit Arnold; Claire Lawson; Melanie J Davies; Hui Xue; Peter Kellman; Gerry P McCann
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diabetol       Date:  2022-05-28       Impact factor: 8.949

3.  Myocardial perfusion MRI shows impaired perfusion of the mouse hypertrophic left ventricle.

Authors:  Bastiaan J van Nierop; Bram F Coolen; Noortje A Bax; Wouter J R Dijk; Elza D van Deel; Dirk J Duncker; Klaas Nicolay; Gustav J Strijkers
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 2.357

4.  Considerations when measuring myocardial perfusion reserve by cardiovascular magnetic resonance using regadenoson.

Authors:  Nicole M Bhave; Benjamin H Freed; Chattanong Yodwut; Denise Kolanczyk; Karin Dill; Roberto M Lang; Victor Mor-Avi; Amit R Patel
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2012-12-28       Impact factor: 5.364

5.  The microvascular effects of insulin resistance and diabetes on cardiac structure, function, and perfusion: a cardiovascular magnetic resonance study.

Authors:  Abdulghani M Larghat; Peter P Swoboda; John D Biglands; Mark T Kearney; John P Greenwood; Sven Plein
Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 6.875

Review 6.  Quantitative Myocardial Perfusion with Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Imaging in MRI and CT: Theoretical Models and Current Implementation.

Authors:  G J Pelgrim; A Handayani; H Dijkstra; N H J Prakken; R H J A Slart; M Oudkerk; P M A Van Ooijen; R Vliegenthart; P E Sijens
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Myocardial perfusion is impaired in asymptomatic renal and liver transplant recipients: a cardiovascular magnetic resonance study.

Authors:  Susie Parnham; Jonathan M Gleadle; Darryl Leong; Suchi Grover; Craig Bradbrook; Richard J Woodman; Carmine G De Pasquale; Joseph B Selvanayagam
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2015-07-10       Impact factor: 5.364

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.