BACKGROUND: The mechanisms by which mandibular advancement splints (MAS) improve obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) are not well understood. This study aimed to evaluate the mechanism of action of MAS by assessing their effect on upper airway structure in patients with OSA. METHODS: Patients were recruited from a sleep disorders clinic for treatment with a custom-made MAS. MRI of the upper airway was performed during wakefulness in the supine position, with and without the MAS. RESULTS: Sixty-nine patients with OSA were recruited. Treatment with the MAS reduced the apnoea-hypopnoea index (AHI) from 27.0+/-14.7 events/h to 12.2+/-12.5 events/h (p<0.001). There was an increase in the total airway volume with mandibular advancement (16.5+/-0.7 cm(3) vs 18.1+/-0.8 cm(3); p<0.01) that occurred predominantly because of an increase in the volume of the velopharynx (5.7+/-0.3 cm(3) vs 6.5+/-0.3 cm(3); p<0.001). This increase in airway calibre was associated with an increase in the lower anterior facial height (6.8+/-0.1 cm vs 7.5+/-0.1 cm; p<0.001), reduction in the distance between the hyoid and posterior nasal spine (7.4+/-0.1 cm vs 7.2+/-0.1 cm; p<0.001), lateral displacement of the parapharyngeal fat pads away from the airway (right parapharyngeal fat pad 0.17+/-0.02 cm; left parapharyngeal fat pad 0.22+/-0.02 cm) and anterior movement of the tongue base muscles (0.33+/-0.03 cm). Subanalyses in responders and non-responders to MAS treatment showed that the increase in upper airway calibre with mandibular advancement occurred only in responders. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that the mechanism of action of MAS is to increase the volume of the upper airway, predominantly by increasing the volume of the velopharynx, and this increased volume is associated with changes in the surrounding bony and soft tissue structures.
BACKGROUND: The mechanisms by which mandibular advancement splints (MAS) improve obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) are not well understood. This study aimed to evaluate the mechanism of action of MAS by assessing their effect on upper airway structure in patients with OSA. METHODS:Patients were recruited from a sleep disorders clinic for treatment with a custom-made MAS. MRI of the upper airway was performed during wakefulness in the supine position, with and without the MAS. RESULTS: Sixty-nine patients with OSA were recruited. Treatment with the MAS reduced the apnoea-hypopnoea index (AHI) from 27.0+/-14.7 events/h to 12.2+/-12.5 events/h (p<0.001). There was an increase in the total airway volume with mandibular advancement (16.5+/-0.7 cm(3) vs 18.1+/-0.8 cm(3); p<0.01) that occurred predominantly because of an increase in the volume of the velopharynx (5.7+/-0.3 cm(3) vs 6.5+/-0.3 cm(3); p<0.001). This increase in airway calibre was associated with an increase in the lower anterior facial height (6.8+/-0.1 cm vs 7.5+/-0.1 cm; p<0.001), reduction in the distance between the hyoid and posterior nasal spine (7.4+/-0.1 cm vs 7.2+/-0.1 cm; p<0.001), lateral displacement of the parapharyngeal fat pads away from the airway (right parapharyngeal fat pad 0.17+/-0.02 cm; left parapharyngeal fat pad 0.22+/-0.02 cm) and anterior movement of the tongue base muscles (0.33+/-0.03 cm). Subanalyses in responders and non-responders to MAS treatment showed that the increase in upper airway calibre with mandibular advancement occurred only in responders. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that the mechanism of action of MAS is to increase the volume of the upper airway, predominantly by increasing the volume of the velopharynx, and this increased volume is associated with changes in the surrounding bony and soft tissue structures.
Authors: Ana Célia Faria; Savio Nogueira da Silva-Junior; Luis Vicente Garcia; Antonio Carlos dos Santos; Maria Regina França Fernandes; Francisco Veríssimo de Mello-Filho Journal: Sleep Breath Date: 2012-05-06 Impact factor: 2.816
Authors: Kate Sutherland; Hisashi Takaya; Jin Qian; Peter Petocz; Andrew T Ng; Peter A Cistulli Journal: J Clin Sleep Med Date: 2015-08-15 Impact factor: 4.062
Authors: B Piskin; O Karakoc; H Genc; S Akay; C Sipahi; M Erdem; B Karaman; S Gorgulu; S Yetkin; S Ayyildiz Journal: J Orofac Orthop Date: 2015-01-22 Impact factor: 1.938
Authors: Maite Barbero; Carlos Flores-Mir; Juan Calvo Blanco; Valentin Cabriada Nuño; Joan Brunso Casellas; Jose Luis Calvo Girado; Julio Alvarez Amezaga; Felix De Carlos Journal: J Clin Sleep Med Date: 2020-10-15 Impact factor: 4.062
Authors: Elizabeth C Brown; Shaokoon Cheng; David K McKenzie; Jane E Butler; Simon C Gandevia; Lynne E Bilston Journal: Sleep Date: 2013-03-01 Impact factor: 5.849
Authors: Chloé Kastoer; Marijke Dieltjens; Eline Oorts; Evert Hamans; Marc J Braem; Paul H Van de Heyning; Olivier M Vanderveken Journal: J Clin Sleep Med Date: 2016-10-15 Impact factor: 4.062