Literature DB >> 25613384

Effects of varying mandibular protrusion and degrees of vertical opening on upper airway dimensions in apneic dentate subjects.

B Piskin1, O Karakoc, H Genc, S Akay, C Sipahi, M Erdem, B Karaman, S Gorgulu, S Yetkin, S Ayyildiz.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Despite numerous studies investigating the dimensional and therapeutic effects of mandibular advancement splints (MASs), data regarding the effects of differently designed individual and non-adjustable MASs on the upper airway in fully dentate apneic subjects in the sagittal plane including comparison of these effects with a placebo device are sparse. The present study aimed to determine the dimensional changes in the sagittal plane created by differently designed MASs in the upper airway in fully dentate apneic subjects and to compare these changes with the effects of a placebo device.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Magnetic resonance (MR) images of 9 dentate apneic subjects with 5 differently designed MASs and without a MAS were obtained. We measured the area of the entire pharynx (velopharynx, oropharynx, hypopharynx) on these MR images and compared the dimensional changes.
RESULTS: The dimensional changes triggered by two specific MASs (75% of the maximum mandibular protrusion with 5 mm vertical opening, and 75% of the maximum mandibular protrusion with 10 mm of vertical opening) in the entire pharynx in the sagittal plane were statistically significant compared to the other MASs (p < 0.05). The MAS effecting 75% of the maximum mandibular protrusion and 10 mm of vertical opening created a significant dimensional increase only in the velopharyngeal area among the three pharyngeal sites (p ≤ 0.003).
CONCLUSION: While the degree of mandibular protrusion created by the MAS affects the dimensions of the upper airway, the degree of the vertical opening exerts no significant dimensional effect in the sagittal plane in fully dentate apneic patients. The mandibular protrusion effect is comparatively larger in the velopharyngeal region.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25613384     DOI: 10.1007/s00056-014-0259-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orofac Orthop        ISSN: 1434-5293            Impact factor:   1.938


  55 in total

Review 1.  Selecting sleep-disordered-breathing appliances. Biomechanical considerations.

Authors:  P T George
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.634

2.  Effects of mandibular advancement on upper airway dimension and collapsibility in patients with obstructive sleep apnea using dynamic upper airway imaging during sleep.

Authors:  Jae-Kap Choi; Youn-Kyung Hur; Jong-Min Lee; Glenn T Clark
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  2010-03-29

3.  Variable site of oropharyngeal narrowing and regional variations of oropharyngeal collapsibility among snoring patients during wakefulness and sleep.

Authors:  J K Choi; W C Kee; J M Lee; M K Ye
Journal:  Cranio       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.020

4.  Influence of oral and craniofacial dimensions on mandibular advancement splint treatment outcome in patients with obstructive sleep apnea.

Authors:  Whitney Mostafiz; Oyku Dalci; Kate Sutherland; Atul Malhotra; Vasanth Srinivasan; M Ali Darendeliler; Peter A Cistulli
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2011-02-03       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 5.  Treatment of snoring and obstructive sleep apnea with mandibular repositioning appliances.

Authors:  Peter A Cistulli; Helen Gotsopoulos; Marie Marklund; Alan A Lowe
Journal:  Sleep Med Rev       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 11.609

6.  Effects of mandibular advancement on supine airway size in normal subjects during sleep.

Authors:  Shigetoshi Hiyama; Satoru Tsuiki; Takashi Ono; Takayuki Kuroda; Kimie Ohyama
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2003-06-15       Impact factor: 5.849

7.  Mandibular advancement splint titration in obstructive sleep apnoea.

Authors:  A J Campbell; G Reynolds; H Trengrove; A M Neill
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2008-11-07       Impact factor: 2.816

8.  Effects of an oral appliance with different mandibular protrusion positions at a constant vertical dimension on obstructive sleep apnea.

Authors:  Ghizlane Aarab; Frank Lobbezoo; Hans L Hamburger; Machiel Naeije
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2009-06-18       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 9.  Oral appliances for snoring and obstructive sleep apnea: a review.

Authors:  Kathleen A Ferguson; Rosalind Cartwright; Robert Rogers; Wolfgang Schmidt-Nowara
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 5.849

10.  Identification of upper airway anatomic risk factors for obstructive sleep apnea with volumetric magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Richard J Schwab; Michael Pasirstein; Robert Pierson; Adonna Mackley; Robert Hachadoorian; Raanan Arens; Greg Maislin; Allan I Pack
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2003-05-13       Impact factor: 21.405

View more
  2 in total

1.  Antero-posterior mandibular position at different vertical levels for mandibular advancing device design.

Authors:  P Mayoral; M O Lagravère; M Míguez-Contreras; M Garcia
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2019-05-22       Impact factor: 2.757

2.  The Most Effective Amount of Forward Movement for Oral Appliances for Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Yuki Sakamoto; Akifumi Furuhashi; Eri Komori; Hiroyuki Ishiyama; Daichi Hasebe; Kazumichi Sato; Hidemichi Yuasa
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 3.390

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.