Literature DB >> 20685406

Longitudinal live animal micro-CT allows for quantitative analysis of tumor-induced bone destruction.

Lindsay C Johnson1, Rachelle W Johnson, Steve A Munoz, Gregory R Mundy, Todd E Peterson, Julie A Sterling.   

Abstract

The majority of breast cancer and prostate cancer patients with metastatic disease will go on to develop bone metastases, which contribute largely to the patient's morbidity and mortality. Numerous small animal models of cancer metastasis to bone have been developed to study tumor-induced bone destruction, but the advancement of imaging modalities utilized for these models has lagged significantly behind clinical imaging. Therefore, there is a significant need for improvements to live small animal imaging, particularly when obtaining high-resolution images for longitudinal quantitative analyses. Recently, live animal micro-computed tomography (μCT) has gained popularity due to its ability to obtain high-resolution 3-dimensional images. However, the utility of μCT in bone metastasis models has been limited to end-point analyses due to off-target radiation effects on tumor cells. We hypothesized that live animal in vivo μCT can be utilized to perform reproducible and quantitative longitudinal analyses of bone volume in tumor-bearing mice, particularly in a drug treatment model of breast cancer metastasis to bone. To test this hypothesis, we utilized the MDA-MB-231 osteolytic breast cancer model in which the tumor cells are inoculated directly into the tibia of athymic nude mice and imaged mice weekly by Faxitron (radiography), Imtek μCT (in vivo), and Maestro (GFP-imaging). Exvivo μCT and histology were performed at end point for validation. After establishing a high-resolution scanning protocol for the Imtek CT, we determined whether clear, measurable differences in bone volume were detectable in mice undergoing bisphosphonate drug treatments. We found that in vivo μCT could be used to obtain quantifiable and longitudinal images of the progression of bone destruction over time without altering tumor cell growth. In addition, we found that we could detect lesions as early as week 1 and that this approach could be used to monitor the effect of drug treatment on bone. Taken together, these data indicate that in vivo μCT is an effective and reproducible method for longitudinal monitoring of tumor-associated bone destruction in mouse models of tumor-induced bone disease.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20685406      PMCID: PMC2974944          DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2010.05.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  17 in total

1.  Ex-vivo analysis of the bone microenvironment in bone metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Karen M Bussard; Andrea M Mastro
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 2.673

Review 2.  Diagnosis of bone metastases in urological malignancies--an update.

Authors:  Nieroshan Rajarubendra; Damien Bolton; Nathan Lawrentschuk
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 3.  Use of bisphosphonates for the treatment of bone metastasis in experimental animal models.

Authors:  T Yoneda; T Michigami; B Yi; P J Williams; M Niewolna; T Hiraga
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 12.111

4.  Rationale for the use of bone scans in selected metastatic and primary bone tumors.

Authors:  B J McNeil
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  1978-10       Impact factor: 4.446

5.  Flat-panel detector-based volume computed tomography: a novel 3D imaging technique to monitor osteolytic bone lesions in a mouse tumor metastasis model.

Authors:  Jeannine Missbach-Guentner; Christian Dullin; Marta Zientkowska; Melanie Domeyer-Missbach; Sarah Kimmina; Silvia Obenauer; Fritz Kauer; Walter Stühmer; Eckhardt Grabbe; Wolfgang F Vogel; Frauke Alves
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 5.715

Review 6.  Animal models of bone metastasis.

Authors:  Thomas J Rosol; Sarah H Tannehill-Gregg; Bruce E LeRoy; Stefanie Mandl; Christopher H Contag
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2003-02-01       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Influence of simultaneous targeting of the bone morphogenetic protein pathway and RANK/RANKL axis in osteolytic prostate cancer lesion in bone.

Authors:  Mandeep S Virk; Frank A Petrigliano; Nancy Q Liu; Arion F Chatziioannou; David Stout; Christine O Kang; William C Dougall; Jay R Lieberman
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2008-09-26       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 8.  Breast cancer: role of SPECT and PET in imaging bone metastases.

Authors:  Simona Ben-Haim; Ora Israel
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 4.446

9.  Breast cancer metastasis to bone: evaluation of bioluminescent imaging and microSPECT/CT for detecting bone metastasis in immunodeficient mice.

Authors:  S Cowey; A A Szafran; J Kappes; K R Zinn; G P Siegal; R A Desmond; H Kim; L Evans; R W Hardy
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2007-05-31       Impact factor: 5.150

10.  Bisphosphonates in oncology: evidence for the prevention of skeletal events in patients with bone metastases.

Authors:  Thomas J Polascik
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2009-09-21       Impact factor: 4.162

View more
  29 in total

1.  Interleukin-27 gene delivery for modifying malignant interactions between prostate tumor and bone.

Authors:  Olga Zolochevska; Jayne Ellis; Sangram Parelkar; Delphine Chan-Seng; Todd Emrick; Jingna Wei; Igor Patrikeev; Massoud Motamedi; Marxa L Figueiredo
Journal:  Hum Gene Ther       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 5.695

2.  Non-invasive microCT imaging characterization and in vivo targeting of BB2 receptor expression of a PC-3 bone metastasis model.

Authors:  Christopher T Winkelmann; Said Daibes Figueroa; Gary L Sieckman; Tammy L Rold; Timothy J Hoffman
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.488

3.  Combined micro CT and histopathology for evaluation of skeletal metastasis in live animals.

Authors:  Christopher P Geffre; Erika Pond; Gerald D Pond; Isis C Sroka; Jaime M Gard; Bethany A Skovan; William E Meek; Terry H Landowski; Raymond B Nagle; Anne E Cress
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2015-02-15       Impact factor: 4.060

4.  Quantitative analysis of bone and soft tissue by micro-computed tomography: applications to ex vivo and in vivo studies.

Authors:  Graeme M Campbell; Antonia Sophocleous
Journal:  Bonekey Rep       Date:  2014-08-20

5.  Models of bone metastasis.

Authors:  J Preston Campbell; Alyssa R Merkel; S Kathryn Masood-Campbell; Florent Elefteriou; Julie A Sterling
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2012-09-04       Impact factor: 1.355

6.  An integrated computational model of the bone microenvironment in bone-metastatic prostate cancer.

Authors:  Arturo Araujo; Leah M Cook; Conor C Lynch; David Basanta
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2014-05-01       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  New tools for the quantitative assessment of prodrug delivery and neurotoxicity.

Authors:  Lynn E Samuelson; Randy L Scherer; Michael N VanSaun; Kang-Hsien Fan; E Ashley Dozier; Kathy J Carter; Tatsuki Koyama; Yu Shyr; Michael Aschner; Gregg D Stanwood; Darryl J Bornhop; Lynn M Matrisian; J Oliver McIntyre
Journal:  Neurotoxicology       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 4.294

8.  Molecular imaging of conscious, unrestrained mice with AwakeSPECT.

Authors:  Justin S Baba; Christopher J Endres; Catherine A Foss; Sridhar Nimmagadda; Hyeyun Jung; James S Goddard; Seungjoon Lee; John McKisson; Mark F Smith; Alexander V Stolin; Andrew G Weisenberger; Martin G Pomper
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 10.057

9.  Prostate cancer metastases alter bone mineral and matrix composition independent of effects on bone architecture in mice--a quantitative study using microCT and Raman spectroscopy.

Authors:  Xiaohong Bi; Julie A Sterling; Alyssa R Merkel; Daniel S Perrien; Jeffry S Nyman; Anita Mahadevan-Jansen
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2013-07-15       Impact factor: 4.398

10.  Pre-clinical Orthotopic Murine Model of Human Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Varahram Shahryari; Hannah Nip; Sharanjot Saini; Altaf A Dar; Soichiro Yamamura; Yozo Mitsui; Melissa Colden; Nathan Bucay; Laura Z Tabatabai; Kirsten Greene; Guoren Deng; Yuichiro Tanaka; Rajvir Dahiya; Shahana Majid
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2016-08-29       Impact factor: 1.355

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.