Literature DB >> 19801220

Breast cancer: role of SPECT and PET in imaging bone metastases.

Simona Ben-Haim1, Ora Israel.   

Abstract

Breast cancer is the most common cause of bone metastases in women. Imaging studies are useful to identify bone involvement and associated complications, for follow-up of disease spread and for the assessment of response to therapy. Bone scintigraphy with (99m)technetium-labeled diphosphonates is most widely used, due to its availability, high sensitivity, and low cost, despite the relatively low specificity. The addition of single-photon emission computed tomography and recently single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography improves the diagnostic accuracy of this modality. Serial follow-up scans can demonstrate disease progression, but this method is less accurate in determining response to treatment. Positron emission tomography (PET), a tomographic modality with improved resolution shows improved sensitivity and specificity. (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-PET is the most common clinically used procedure. FDG is taken up by the tumor cells and has therefore the advantage of demonstrating the presence of disease in both bone and soft tissues. FDG-PET is highly sensitive mainly in diagnosis of early metastatic disease, which may still be confined to the bone marrow, as well as for the detection of lytic bone metastases and can be also reliably used to monitor response to therapy. For the detection of sclerotic lesions, however, imaging with a bone-seeking tracer such as (18)F-fluoride, may have a complementary role. As a nonspecific skeletal imaging tracer, (18)F-fluoride has great potential, being more sensitive than bone scintigraphy and when PET/computed tomography is performed it is highly accurate for detection of both lytic and sclerotic lesions and to distinguish benign from malignant skeletal findings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19801220     DOI: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2009.05.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Nucl Med        ISSN: 0001-2998            Impact factor:   4.446


  14 in total

1.  CT-based handling and analysis of preclinical multimodality imaging data of bone metastases.

Authors:  Thomas J A Snoeks; Martin Baiker; Eric L Kaijzel; Boudewijn P F Lelieveldt; Clemens W G M Löwik
Journal:  Bonekey Rep       Date:  2012-05-09

2.  Combined 18F-fluoride and 18F-FDG PET/CT: a response based on actual data from prospective studies.

Authors:  Andrei Iagaru; Camila Mosci; David W Dick; Mike Sathekge; Paula Lapa; Joao M de Lima; Sanjiv Sam Gambhir
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-09-21       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Circulating Tumor Cells in Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Prognostic and Predictive Marker.

Authors:  Sayyed Farshid Moussavi-Harami; Kari B Wisinski; David J Beebe
Journal:  J Patient Cent Res Rev       Date:  2014

4.  (18)F-NaF PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for bone imaging.

Authors:  M Beheshti; F M Mottaghy; F Paycha; F F F Behrendt; T Van den Wyngaert; I Fogelman; K Strobel; M Celli; S Fanti; F Giammarile; B Krause; W Langsteger
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  Longitudinal live animal micro-CT allows for quantitative analysis of tumor-induced bone destruction.

Authors:  Lindsay C Johnson; Rachelle W Johnson; Steve A Munoz; Gregory R Mundy; Todd E Peterson; Julie A Sterling
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 4.398

6.  Comparisons between glucose analogue 2-deoxy-2-((18)F)fluoro-D-glucose and (18)F-sodium fluoride positron emission tomography/computed tomography in breast cancer patients with bone lesions.

Authors:  Selene Capitanio; Francesca Bongioanni; Arnoldo Piccardo; Claudio Campus; Roberta Gonella; Lucia Tixi; Mehrdad Naseri; Michele Pennone; Vania Altrinetti; Ambra Buschiazzo; Irene Bossert; Francesco Fiz; Andrea Bruno; Andrea DeCensi; Gianmario Sambuceti; Silvia Morbelli
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2016-02-28

Review 7.  The diagnostic imaging of bone metastases.

Authors:  Walter Heindel; Raphael Gübitz; Volker Vieth; Matthias Weckesser; Otmar Schober; Michael Schäfers
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 5.594

8.  Prospective evaluation of (99m)Tc MDP scintigraphy, (18)F NaF PET/CT, and (18)F FDG PET/CT for detection of skeletal metastases.

Authors:  Andrei Iagaru; Erik Mittra; David W Dick; Sanjiv Sam Gambhir
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 9.  Recent Advances in the Development of Tetrazine Ligation Tools for Pretargeted Nuclear Imaging.

Authors:  Rocío García-Vázquez; Umberto Maria Battisti; Matthias M Herth
Journal:  Pharmaceuticals (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-30

10.  Added diagnostic value of SPECT to evaluate bone metastases in breast cancer patients with normal whole body bone scan.

Authors:  Seyed Mohammad Abedi; Alireza Mardanshahi; Reza Zeanali
Journal:  Caspian J Intern Med       Date:  2021-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.