Literature DB >> 20683818

MR cisternography: is it useful in the diagnosis of normal-pressure hydrocephalus and the selection of "good shunt responders"?

Oktay Algin1, Bahattin Hakyemez, Gökhan Ocakoğlu, Müfit Parlak.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficiency of MR cisternography (MRC) in the diagnosis of idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus (INPH) and in the prediction of the response to shunt treatment.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-six patients with the diagnosis of "probable INPH" were included in the study group and 15 asymptomatic age-matched individuals were included in the control group. Pre-contrast T1-weighted (T1W) imaging was followed by intrathecal administration of 1 ml gadopentetate dimeglumine. Post-contrast T1W images were taken at the 12th, 24th and 48th hours. The presence of contrast material in the lateral ventricles for more than 24 hours was accepted as a positive diagnosis of INPH. Data from both groups were compared statistically. Statistical significance was accepted for P < 0.05.
RESULTS: All of the INPH patients had remaining contrast material in their lateral ventricles at the 12th and 24th hours, while only 28 (78%) patients had contrast material remaining at the 48th hour after MRC. Only 3 (20%) of the control cases had remaining contrast material in their lateral ventricles at the 24th hour. No contrast material was present in the control cases at the 48th hour. The contrast material was found to be significantly more prevalent in the INPH patients at the 24th and the 48th hours compared with the control cases (P < 0.001). Shunt placement was performed in 14 INPH patients, and eight improved after shunt placement. All patients (100%) who improved after shunt placement had remaining contrast material in their lateral ventricles at the 24th and at the 48th hours. The sensitivity and specificity of MRC in the prediction of the response to shunt treatment were 100% and 17%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: MRC does not use ionizing radiation and is generally a useful procedure to diagnose NPH and to predict a positive response to shunt treatment; thus, we recommend MRC after routine MRI in patients with the presumed diagnosis of NPH.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20683818     DOI: 10.4261/1305-3825.DIR.3133-09.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol        ISSN: 1305-3825            Impact factor:   2.630


  8 in total

1.  Unusual patient with multiple sclerosis and shunt-responsive normal-pressure hydrocephalus.

Authors:  O Algin; O Taskapilioglu; B Hakyemez; M Parlak
Journal:  Clin Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-04-02       Impact factor: 3.649

Review 2.  Intrathecal gadolinium-enhanced MR cisternography: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  O Algin; B Turkbey
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-01-19       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Intrathecal Use of Gadobutrol for Glymphatic MR Imaging: Prospective Safety Study of 100 Patients.

Authors:  C S Edeklev; M Halvorsen; G Løvland; S A S Vatnehol; Ø Gjertsen; B Nedregaard; R Sletteberg; G Ringstad; P K Eide
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2019-07-18       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Evaluation of aqueductal stenosis by 3D sampling perfection with application-optimized contrasts using different flip angle evolutions sequence: preliminary results with 3T MR imaging.

Authors:  O Algin; B Turkbey
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  Evaluation of hydrocephalus and other cerebrospinal fluid disorders with MRI: An update.

Authors:  Merve Gulbiz Kartal; Oktay Algin
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2014-06-06

6.  Results of Isotope Cisternography in 175 Patients with a Suspected Hydrocephalus.

Authors:  Kyeong-Seok Lee; Sang-Mi Lee; Jae-Joon Shim; Seok-Mann Yoon; Hack-Gun Bae; Jae-Won Doh
Journal:  Korean J Neurotrauma       Date:  2015-04-30

Review 7.  Venous hemodynamics in neurological disorders: an analytical review with hydrodynamic analysis.

Authors:  Clive B Beggs
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 8.775

8.  Off-label intrathecal use of gadobutrol: safety study and comparison of administration protocols.

Authors:  Merete Halvorsen; Camilla Sæthre Edeklev; Jorunn Fraser-Green; Grethe Løvland; Svein Are Sirirud Vatnehol; Øivind Gjertsen; Bård Nedregaard; Ruth Sletteberg; Geir Ringstad; Per Kristian Eide
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2020-08-15       Impact factor: 2.804

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.