Literature DB >> 20683190

Americans hear as well or better today compared with 40 years ago: hearing threshold levels in the unscreened adult population of the United States, 1959-1962 and 1999-2004.

Howard J Hoffman1, Robert A Dobie, Chia-Wen Ko, Christa L Themann, William J Murphy.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: (1) To present hearing threshold data from a recent nationally representative survey in the United States (National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1999-2004) in a distributional format that might be appropriate to replace Annex B in international (ISO-1999) and national (ANSI S3.44) standards and (2) to compare these recent data with older survey data (National Health Examination Survey I, 1959-1962) on which the current Annex B is based.
DESIGN: Better-ear threshold distributions (selected percentiles and their confidence intervals) were estimated using linear interpolation. The 95% confidence intervals for the medians for the two surveys were compared graphically for each of the four age groups and for both men and women. In addition, we calculated odds ratios comparing the prevalences of better-ear hearing impairment (thresholds > 25 dB HL) between the two surveys, for 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz, and for their four-frequency average.
RESULTS: Across age and sex groups, median thresholds were lower (better) in the 1999-2004 survey at 500, 3000, 4000, and 6000 Hz (8000 Hz was not tested in the 1959-1962 survey). For both men and women, the prevalence of hearing impairment was significantly lower in 1999-2004 at 500, 2000, and 4000 Hz, but not at 1000 Hz.
CONCLUSIONS: For men and women of a specific age, high-frequency hearing thresholds were lower (better) in 1999-2004 than in 1959-1962. The prevalences of hearing impairment were also lower in the recent survey. Differences seen at 500 Hz may be attributable at least in part to changes in standards for ambient noise in audiometry. The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999-2004 distributions are offered as a possible replacement for Annex B in ISO-1999 and ANSI S3.44.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20683190     DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181e9770e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  33 in total

1.  [Prevalence of hearing impairment in northwestern Germany. Results of an epidemiological study on hearing status (HÖRSTAT)].

Authors:  P von Gablenz; I Holube
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  Addressing Estimated Hearing Loss in Adults in 2060.

Authors:  Adele M Goman; Nicholas S Reed; Frank R Lin
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 6.223

3.  Tracking occupational hearing loss across global industries: a comparative analysis of metrics.

Authors:  Peter M Rabinowitz; Deron Galusha; Michael F McTague; Martin D Slade; James C Wesdock; Christine Dixon-Ernst
Journal:  Noise Health       Date:  2012 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 0.867

4.  Declining Prevalence of Hearing Loss in US Adults Aged 20 to 69 Years.

Authors:  Howard J Hoffman; Robert A Dobie; Katalin G Losonczy; Christa L Themann; Gregory A Flamme
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 6.223

5.  Hearing impairment associated with depression in US adults, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2005-2010.

Authors:  Chuan-Ming Li; Xinzhi Zhang; Howard J Hoffman; Mary Frances Cotch; Christa L Themann; M Roy Wilson
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 6.223

6.  Age-Related Changes in Temporal Resolution Revisited: Electrophysiological and Behavioral Findings From Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Bruna S S Mussoi; Carolyn J Brown
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  PREVALENCE OF POTENTIAL HYBRID AND CONVENTIONAL COCHLEAR IMPLANT CANDIDATES BASED ON AUDIOMETRIC PROFILE.

Authors:  Adele M Goman; Camille C Dunn; Bruce J Gantz; Frank R Lin
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 2.311

8.  How Can Public Health Approaches and Perspectives Advance Hearing Health Care?

Authors:  Kelly M Reavis; Kelly L Tremblay; Gabrielle Saunders
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Hearing loss prevalence in the United States.

Authors:  Frank R Lin; John K Niparko; Luigi Ferrucci
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2011-11-14

10.  Mutation of the ATP-gated P2X(2) receptor leads to progressive hearing loss and increased susceptibility to noise.

Authors:  Denise Yan; Yan Zhu; Tom Walsh; Dinghua Xie; Huijun Yuan; Asli Sirmaci; Taro Fujikawa; Ann Chi Yan Wong; Tze L Loh; Lilin Du; M'hamed Grati; Srdjan M Vlajkovic; Susan Blanton; Allen F Ryan; Zheng-Yi Chen; Peter R Thorne; Bechara Kachar; Mustafa Tekin; Hong-Bo Zhao; Gary D Housley; Mary-Claire King; Xue Z Liu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.