PURPOSE: This study compares the efficacy of a self-help intervention tailored to the individual's stage of motivational readiness for exercise adoption with a standard self-help exercise promotion intervention. DESIGN: Interventions were delivered at baseline and 1 month; assessments were collected at baseline and 3 months. SETTING:Eleven worksites participating in the Working Healthy Research Trial. SUBJECTS:Participants (n = 1559) were a subsample of employees at participating worksites, individually randomized to one of two treatment conditions. INTERVENTION: Printed self-help exercise promotion materials either (1) matched to the individual's stage of motivational readiness for exercise adoption (motivationally tailored), or (2) standard materials (standard). MEASURES: Measures of stage of motivational readiness for exercise and items from the 7-Day Physical Activity Recall. RESULTS: Among intervention completers (n = 903), chi-square analyses showed that, compared to the standard intervention, those receiving the motivationally tailored intervention were significantly more likely to show increases (37% vs. 27%) and less likely to show either no change (52% vs. 58%) or regression (11% vs. 15%) in stage of motivational readiness. Multivariate analyses of variance showed that changes in stage of motivational readiness were significantly associated with changes in self-reported time spent in exercise. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first prospective, randomized, controlled trial demonstrating the efficacy of a brief motivationally tailored intervention compared to a standard self-help intervention for exercise adoption. These findings appear to support treatment approaches that tailor interventions to the individual's stage of motivational readiness for exercise adoption.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: This study compares the efficacy of a self-help intervention tailored to the individual's stage of motivational readiness for exercise adoption with a standard self-help exercise promotion intervention. DESIGN: Interventions were delivered at baseline and 1 month; assessments were collected at baseline and 3 months. SETTING: Eleven worksites participating in the Working Healthy Research Trial. SUBJECTS:Participants (n = 1559) were a subsample of employees at participating worksites, individually randomized to one of two treatment conditions. INTERVENTION: Printed self-help exercise promotion materials either (1) matched to the individual's stage of motivational readiness for exercise adoption (motivationally tailored), or (2) standard materials (standard). MEASURES: Measures of stage of motivational readiness for exercise and items from the 7-Day Physical Activity Recall. RESULTS: Among intervention completers (n = 903), chi-square analyses showed that, compared to the standard intervention, those receiving the motivationally tailored intervention were significantly more likely to show increases (37% vs. 27%) and less likely to show either no change (52% vs. 58%) or regression (11% vs. 15%) in stage of motivational readiness. Multivariate analyses of variance showed that changes in stage of motivational readiness were significantly associated with changes in self-reported time spent in exercise. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first prospective, randomized, controlled trial demonstrating the efficacy of a brief motivationally tailored intervention compared to a standard self-help intervention for exercise adoption. These findings appear to support treatment approaches that tailor interventions to the individual's stage of motivational readiness for exercise adoption.
Authors: David M Williams; Charles E Matthews; Candace Rutt; Melissa A Napolitano; Bess H Marcus Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2008-07 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Lisa Chasan-Taber; Bess H Marcus; Edward Stanek; Joseph T Ciccolo; David X Marquez; Caren G Solomon; Glenn Markenson Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2009-06 Impact factor: 2.681