David L B Schwappach1, Martin Wernli. 1. Swiss Patient Safety Foundation, Asylstr. 77, 8032 Zuerich, Switzerland. schwappach@patientensicherheit.ch
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patients can make contributions to the safety of chemotherapy administration but little is known about their motivations to participate in safety-enhancing strategies. The theory of planned behavior was applied to analyze attitudes, norms, behavioral control, and chemotherapy patients' intentions to participate in medical error prevention. METHODS: A quantitative, cross-sectional survey study among chemotherapy patients treated at the oncology/hematology department of a large regional hospital was conducted. Confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation modeling were used to investigate the relationship between patients' responses to measures of attitudes, norms, and behavioral control and their intentions. RESULTS: Four hundred seventy-nine patients completed the survey (52% response rate). Attitudes, perceived behavioral control, and subjective norms explained 62% of the variance in intentions to engage in error monitoring and reporting. Perceived behavioral control (beta = 0.476), norms relating to patients' relatives (beta = 0.343), and instrumental attitudes (beta = 0.281) were the strongest (direct) predictors of patients' intentions. Experiential attitudes had the smallest effect on intentions (beta = 0.178). Subjective norms relating to expectations attributed to oncology staff had strong direct and indirect effects on patients' intentions (total effect, 0.382). CONCLUSIONS: Patients acknowledge the benefit of error monitoring and reporting and anticipate positive outcomes of involvement, but their valuations of the process of engaging in error prevention are less positive. Behavioral control and perceptions of staff approval are central for patients. Involvement of cancer patients in safety requires oncologists to address their patients' normative and control beliefs through education and proactive approval of patient engagement.
BACKGROUND:Patients can make contributions to the safety of chemotherapy administration but little is known about their motivations to participate in safety-enhancing strategies. The theory of planned behavior was applied to analyze attitudes, norms, behavioral control, and chemotherapy patients' intentions to participate in medical error prevention. METHODS: A quantitative, cross-sectional survey study among chemotherapy patients treated at the oncology/hematology department of a large regional hospital was conducted. Confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation modeling were used to investigate the relationship between patients' responses to measures of attitudes, norms, and behavioral control and their intentions. RESULTS: Four hundred seventy-nine patients completed the survey (52% response rate). Attitudes, perceived behavioral control, and subjective norms explained 62% of the variance in intentions to engage in error monitoring and reporting. Perceived behavioral control (beta = 0.476), norms relating to patients' relatives (beta = 0.343), and instrumental attitudes (beta = 0.281) were the strongest (direct) predictors of patients' intentions. Experiential attitudes had the smallest effect on intentions (beta = 0.178). Subjective norms relating to expectations attributed to oncology staff had strong direct and indirect effects on patients' intentions (total effect, 0.382). CONCLUSIONS:Patients acknowledge the benefit of error monitoring and reporting and anticipate positive outcomes of involvement, but their valuations of the process of engaging in error prevention are less positive. Behavioral control and perceptions of staff approval are central for patients. Involvement of cancerpatients in safety requires oncologists to address their patients' normative and control beliefs through education and proactive approval of patient engagement.
Authors: M McGuckin; R Waterman; L Porten; S Bello; M Caruso; B Juzaitis; E Krug; S Mazer; S Ostrawski Journal: Am J Infect Control Date: 1999-08 Impact factor: 2.918
Authors: Tejal K Gandhi; Sylvia B Bartel; Lawrence N Shulman; Deborah Verrier; Elisabeth Burdick; Angela Cleary; Jeffrey M Rothschild; Lucian L Leape; David W Bates Journal: Cancer Date: 2005-12-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Saul N Weingart; Maria Toth; Jonathan Eneman; Mark D Aronson; Daniel Z Sands; Amy N Ship; Roger B Davis; Russell S Phillips Journal: Int J Qual Health Care Date: 2004-12 Impact factor: 2.038
Authors: Saul N Weingart; Brett Simchowitz; Terry Kahlert Eng; Laurinda Morway; Justin Spencer; Junya Zhu; Christine Cleary; Janet Korman-Parra; Kathleen Horvath Journal: Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf Date: 2009-02
Authors: Sara Garfield; Seetal Jheeta; Fran Husson; Jill Lloyd; Alex Taylor; Charles Boucher; Ann Jacklin; Anna Bischler; Christine Norton; Rob Hayles; Bryony Dean Franklin Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-04-19 Impact factor: 3.240