Literature DB >> 20680695

The learning curve for robotic thyroidectomy: a multicenter study.

Jandee Lee1, Jong Ho Yun, Kee Hyun Nam, Euy-Young Soh, Woong Youn Chung.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The learning curve for robotic thyroidectomy with central compartment node dissection (CCND) has not been established. We examined the effect of experience of robotic thyroidectomy on a range of perioperative parameters in order to determine the learning curve. The learner surgeon outcomes were compared with those of an experienced surgeon.
METHODS: We conducted a prospective, controlled, multicenter study involving four endocrine surgeons at three academic centers. Patients underwent robotic total or subtotal thyroidectomy with CCND between September 2008 and October 2009. One surgeon was experienced in the technique (experienced surgeon, ES), while the other three surgeons had endoscopic thyroid surgery experience but no experience performing the robotic procedure (nonrobotic thyroid surgery experienced surgeon, NS). Outcome measures were demographic data, operative time, blood loss, hospital stay, pathologic results, and postoperative complications.
RESULTS: A total of 644 total or subtotal robotic thyroidectomies with CCND were performed: 377 (58.7%) by NSs and 267 (41.5%) by the ES. Mean operative time was longer and the complication rate was higher for the NS patient group compared with the ES patient group (P < 0.001 for each). The operative times and complications rates for the NS group were similar to those of the ES group once the NSs had performed 50 cases for total thyroidectomies or 40 cases for subtotal thyroidectomies.
CONCLUSION: The learning curve duration for robotic thyroidectomy with CCND using gasless transaxillary approach for experienced endoscopic thyroidectomy surgeons was 50 cases for total thyroidectomy and 40 cases for subtotal thyroidectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20680695     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-010-1220-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  54 in total

1.  Robotic transaxillary endocrine surgery: a comparison with conventional open technique.

Authors:  Christina S Foley; Orhan Agcaoglu; Allan E Siperstein; Eren Berber
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-02-07       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Modifications of transaxillary approach in endoscopic da Vinci-assisted thyroid and parathyroid gland surgery.

Authors:  Basel Al Kadah; Micaela Piccoli; Barbara Mullineris; Giovanni Colli; Martin Janssen; Stephan Siemer; Bernhard Schick
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2014-09-02

3.  Endoscopic retroauricular thyroidectomy: preliminary results.

Authors:  Hyung Kwon Byeon; F Christopher Holsinger; Ralph P Tufano; Jae Hong Park; Nam Suk Sim; Won Shik Kim; Eun Chang Choi; Yoon Woo Koh
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Operative outcomes of robot-assisted transaxillary thyroid surgery for benign thyroid disease: early experience in 50 patients.

Authors:  Dan Damian Axente; Horatiu Silaghi; Cristina Alina Silaghi; Zsigmond Zoltán Major; Carmen Maria Micu; Nicolae Augustin Constantea
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2013-05-23       Impact factor: 3.445

5.  Feasibility, Safety, and Surgical Outcome of Robotic Hemithyroidectomy Via Transaxillary and Retroauricular Approach: an Institutional Experience.

Authors:  Surender Dabas; Karan Gupta; Yogendra Singh Bhakuni; Reetesh Ranjan; Himanshu Shukla; Ashwani Sharma
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-05-19

6.  European Association of Endoscopic Surgeons (EAES) consensus statement on the use of robotics in general surgery.

Authors:  Amir Szold; Roberto Bergamaschi; Ivo Broeders; Jenny Dankelman; Antonello Forgione; Thomas Langø; Andreas Melzer; Yoav Mintz; Salvador Morales-Conde; Michael Rhodes; Richard Satava; Chung-Ngai Tang; Ramon Vilallonga
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-11-08       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  A prospective 1-year comparative study of transaxillary total thyroidectomy regarding functional outcomes: Is it really promising?

Authors:  Doh Young Lee; Saehee Lim; Sung Hoon Kang; Kyoung Ho Oh; Jae-Gu Cho; Seung-Kuk Baek; Jeong-Soo Woo; Soon-Young Kwon; Kwang-Yoon Jung
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  The current status of robotic transaxillary thyroidectomy in the United States: an experience from two centers.

Authors:  Nisar Zaidi; Despoina Daskalaki; Pablo Quadri; Alexis Okoh; Pier Cristoforo Giulianotti; Eren Berber
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2017-08

9.  Early outcomes in transoral vestibular thyroidectomy: Robotic versus endoscopic techniques.

Authors:  Christopher R Razavi; Mai G Al Khadem; Akeweh Fondong; James H Clark; Jeremy D Richmon; Ralph P Tufano; Jonathon O Russell
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2018-05-13       Impact factor: 3.147

10.  Robotic thyroidectomy for cancer in the US: patterns of use and short-term outcomes.

Authors:  Mohamed Abdelgadir Adam; Paul Speicher; John Pura; Michaela A Dinan; Shelby D Reed; Sanziana A Roman; Julie A Sosa
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 5.344

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.